I was thinking more of pundits, but fair point on Toure's agent.Toure's agent.
I was thinking more of pundits, but fair point on Toure's agent.Toure's agent.
That's what happens when a club is big news. United stories, good, bad or indifferent sell papers, generate clicks, get people to comment people to share those stories on social media much more that stories surrounding Manchester City. Who is a Manchester City rent a quote for the press when they need to publish a negative story on City? Scholes is that for United. I can't think of one regarding City.
I agree with this. You only have to look at who they get in to be a pundit for their games. City 'legend' Richard Dunne. The gulf is 'massive'.That's what happens when a club is big news. United stories, good, bad or indifferent sell papers, generate clicks, get people to comment people to share those stories on social media much more that stories surrounding Manchester City. Who is a Manchester City rent a quote for the press when they need to publish a negative story on City? Scholes is that for United. I can't think of one regarding City.
I'd rather that we have Neuer between the sticks... failing that, my second choice is Bravo.
But my point is not about how United have done this season. It's about what the pundits would be writing if United had produced a season like City so far. The strength of the early performances would only make the criticism of the last four games more enthusiastic.
I don't agree, if United showed some wow factor like City have this season few would be doing anything but fawning all over Mou and how he was always the right man for the job
Mate this would be crisis in the media if this was United under Mou..Except they are in 1st place in the Premiership and in qualifying position in CL - much ado about nada
I don't agree, if United showed some wow factor like City have this season few would be doing anything but fawning all over Mou and how he was always the right man for the job
"Better team until the sending off"
I've heard it all now![]()
If United had gone 4 games with 2 thrashing and no wins regardless of previous results, the media would have been all over the place harping on about crisis.
These City lots trying to console themselves about how they play and "possession" when all they achieved so far are heavy defeats.
No one praises Wenger for getting mopped around while playing beautifully.
Pep goes around showing tactical naivety and people want to dress it as losing while playing well. What kind of joke is that
Other managers and teams (especially us) get hounded by the media after each defeat regardless of how the game went on but we're sitting here seeing people trying to find excuses and sugarcoat City's defeats.
If United had gone 4 games with 2 thrashing and no wins regardless of previous results, the media would have been all over the place harping on about crisis.
These City lots trying to console themselves about how they play and "possession" when all they achieved so far are heavy defeats.
No one praises Wenger for getting mopped around while playing beautifully.
Pep goes around showing tactical naivety and people want to dress it as losing while playing well. What kind of joke is that
Other managers and teams (especially us) get hounded by the media after each defeat regardless of how the game went on but we're sitting here seeing people trying to find excuses and sugarcoat City's defeats.
Curious how Pep was tactically naive, seemed to get it spot on. Moreover, Lucho had no answer to it other than waiting/hoping for mistakes
At the end of the day, City is still a much smaller club and brand compared to the Reals, Barcas, Milans, Uniteds, Bocas and Arsenal's of the world. People internationally (or at least outside of Europe) genuinely hadnt heard much about them (or at all) before 2011. And inside of England they probably received about as much attention as a QPR or Villa until 2008. My point is, you don't become a huge club overnight so with that the level of scrutiny or 'caring' you face will be proportional to national and international interest. That's why so much attention is focused on United or Liverpool, and not City, for example.I don't agree, if United showed some wow factor like City have this season few would be doing anything but fawning all over Mou and how he was always the right man for the job
Exactly. His Bayern team was outclassed by Madrid, Barca and then lost against Atletico. His city team was outclassed by Barca already. He has no answer when he plays against Spanish 3. For a supposedly tactical genius, his team got outclassed whenever faced equal or better team.
Oh yeah. He was in his sabbatical.@Santoryo
To be fair Pep wasn't in charge when Barca got dicked by Bayern.
Also the thread is derailing.
At the end of the day, City is still a much smaller club and brand compared to the Reals, Barcas, Milans, Uniteds, Bocas and Arsenal's of the world. People internationally (or at least outside of Europe) genuinely hadnt heard much about them (or at all) before 2011. And inside of England they probably received about as much attention as a QPR or Villa until 2008. My point is, you don't become a huge club overnight so with that the level of scrutiny or 'caring' you face will be proportional to national and international interest. That's why so much attention is focused on United or Liverpool, and not City, for example.
The result yesterday is hilarious to everyone except city fans in england. And it is expected/unsurprising to the rest of the world.
Ithey are also clearly ambitious as evidenced not only by their financial outlay but their committment to being in it for the long run. Pep et al is only part of that, for now.
See these are the excuses people keep coming with for Pep and they've become more frequent. A lot of ifs involved and hypothetical situations.Meh. Bayern was devastated by injury in the tie against Barcelona and then completely dominated Atleti, losing because the ball just wouldn't go in the net and due to an offside goal. I don't think either of those ties say much negative about Guardiola's tactics.
I think he got the tactics fairly correct yesterday, at least until the red card. How many teams have you seen go to Camp Nou and hold their own - not just with the result, but in terms of chances and hold on the match - for the first 60 minutes? Its easy to laugh at the scoreline but this was one of the better away performances against Barcelona in European play in recent years, until the red card.
Meh. Bayern was devastated by injury in the tie against Barcelona and then completely dominated Atleti, losing because the ball just wouldn't go in the net and due to an offside goal. I don't think either of those ties say much negative about Guardiola's tactics.
I think he got the tactics fairly correct yesterday, at least until the red card. How many teams have you seen go to Camp Nou and hold their own - not just with the result, but in terms of chances and hold on the match - for the first 60 minutes? Its easy to laugh at the scoreline but this was one of the better away performances against Barcelona in European play in recent years, until the red card.
They have even appropriated Barcelona's colours with their away kit. It is kind of pathetic really.
If they produce some technically gifted England players from their wannabe La Masia academy I supposed I will have to forgive them.
Was just going to mention that but realised the cult of Pep is strong.Funny how many excuses are used to defend Pep's big losses.
Why wasn't the same excuse used for yesterday's game when Barca played with second string defense for most of the game?
Was just going to mention that but realised the cult of Pep is strong.
It is not. there is demonstrably more written about United or Barca than there is about City and that stems from historical dominance and global canvases of the 2 clubs. City is a much better-known club now, especially since they have some top international players. And perhaps they force to be reckoned with in Europe. But they were a non-entity internationally before 2008, that is a fact.I think this is just the perspective of United fans if not wishful thinking. Of course they are a much smaller club & brand than those you mentioned but they are also clearly ambitious as evidenced not only by their financial outlay but their committment to being in it for the long run. Pep et al is only part of that, for now.
And, again, even from the perspective of a Barcelona fan, it wasn't as hilarious as the scoreline would suggest from start to finish
Next they will copy Barca's tax policy.
This kind of response is the reason why I feel Jose's approach against Liverpool was justified. 'More shots on goal, equal possession, Barca looked not as dangerous' 4 fecking 0. What's the point?
For an away team playing Barcelona they were not too bad until that point tbf. Certainly not the better team of course.
Jose is pragmatic and doesn't mind playing negative football if that is the best tactic.
With Pep, he has only managed the best teams ever. This means he is used to playing in a dominant fashion. Unfortunately, when you don't have the best players, playing in a dominant fashion may result in losses, as we saw yesterday.
This is why, IMO Jose is a better manager as he can manage great sides, as well as sides with lesser players. Porto and Inter Milan winning the league and CL double, is pretty damn impressive. I mean, who the hell are Porto?
Bayern Munich scored one similar yesterdayBut that red card came courtesy of Pep's big statement signing. Cant use it as an excuse.
Wonder if there's been any mention of them attempting (and failing) to carbon copy our corner kick from the Leicester game?
They have even appropriated Barcelona's colours with their away kit. It is kind of pathetic really.
If they produce some technically gifted England players from their wannabe La Masia academy I supposed I will have to forgive them.
It is not. there is demonstrably more written about United or Barca than there is about City and that stems from historical dominance and global canvases of the 2 clubs. City is a much better-known club now, especially since they have some top international players. And perhaps they force to be reckoned with in Europe. But they were a non-entity internationally before 2008, that is a fact.
Can't argue there. I don't think anyone would question their ambition. While I think they should try and forge their own identity instead of sicophantically copying Barca's (wtf was that away kit yesterday?), In the spirit of this thread and yesterday's result, for the time being I'll just laugh at City until they give me reason not toNot debating the history just that the ambition of the club is to create that identity. Hence, why they have done what they have
Exactly. Jose has done it regardless of the club size or financial situation against the best in the world.Jose is pragmatic and doesn't mind playing negative football if that is the best tactic.
With Pep, he has only managed the best teams ever. This means he is used to playing in a dominant fashion. Unfortunately, when you don't have the best players, playing in a dominant fashion may result in losses, as we saw yesterday.
This is why, IMO Jose is a better manager as he can manage great sides, as well as sides with lesser players. Porto and Inter Milan winning the league and CL double, is pretty damn impressive. I mean, who the hell are Porto?
Can't argue there. I don't think anyone would question their ambition. While I think they should try and forge their own identity instead of sicophantically copying Barca's (wtf was that away kit yesterday?), In the spirit of this thread and yesterday's result, for the time being I'll just laugh at City until they give me reason not to![]()
If you're trying to create an identity, I'm sure there are a few to emulate that are worthy and certainly Barcelona's would be high on anyone's list to aspire to. Can't fault City for that, IMHO. But it's true, you can't copy it - there are nuances to Barcelona that could never be replicated elsewhere. I can't say, ultimately, whether it's a fool's errand to take this approach but I certainly don't think it's mockable to try
I certainly don't think it's mockable to try