Classical Mechanic
Full Member
Well the conservatives changed their leader from a technocratic malfunctioning maybot to a populist whose personal appeal allowed some who wouldn't usually vote conservative to do so.
Corbyn entered the election as the most unpopular leader of the opposition in recorded history with people having had several years to make up their mind about him as opposed to 2017 when he was relatively unknown
The conservatives didn't score any massive own goals such as the dementia tax
Labour did score own goals this time with uncosted pledges such as the waspi one and a manifesto in 2017 that polled well to a 2019 one which was seen as overload and unachievable
I mean it's not as is labours vote went up in pro immigration / remain constituiences... It was down pretty much everywhere because of Corbyn being seen as an unpopular antisemitic and incompetent leader backed by an unbelievable manifesto
I might have agreed with you a little while back but after listening to the two academics (I keep mentioning) and realising that the Tories are capitalising on everything they've been predicting I have come to a different conclusion. Labour did relatively well in 2017 because they backed Brexit and ending FoM whilst going up against a terrible leader after 8 years of Tory austerity etc. In 2019 they abandoned Brexit in any meaningful sense and ending FoM as a by-product of that whilst at the same time the membership were actually voting to extend FoM! The wider electorate came to realise the wider ideological makeup of the party whilst they were not offering the key thing that they voted for in 2017.
My thinking is now that I'm going to vote for Nandy in the leadership election. I read that she's the only candidate the Tories fear because she understands the dynamics I'm talking about and has the right track record around them. RLB and Starmer both represent the two Labour eras that have destroyed Labours traditional base in my opinion and make them unelectable in the UK currently.