The UK is not returning to the EU any time soon. What I am saying is that the UK keeps drifting further and further away because for that unknown reason it's supposed to able to turn out alright.
Correct, we are not going back, well not in my lifetime (whats left of it). Yes we keep drifting away, it is obvious that would happen and it was even predicted that we would float away (metaphorically speaking) into the North Sea or maybe the Atlantic. Presumably to be able to position ourselves between the US, EU and now possibly BRICS, doing a 'little bit of business' with each, and not to be reliant on just one.
Starmer has no choice he has to go 'all in' with a
Social Contract first, then worry about how to pay for it afterwards, the question is
when does he release his 'contact'. Risk waiting until he's elected and perhaps losing more than he gains, or going early and be finding that a 'dream' could rapidly turn into a nightmare, with the Tory Press having the dream narrative control stick!
Yes, he is dropping hints about 'war chests' and so on, but these will only last a short time even if they are fully successful. Brexit should have taught British politicians one thing, that a great many people care as much, if not more, about social conditions as they do about economic conditions, mainly because the average person can see the results of not having their own home or security of tenure, of, not being able to get in at the school of their choice unless they move, of 'real' jobs disappearing, or rather, only those wanting 'zero hours' should apply, etc.
I don't know what the figures were but an educated guess would be that something like 70% of those voting for leave knew little if anything about how the EU worked or how Britain's politicians were poor at playing the EU game. So poor at it that they asked the most simplistic question in relation to a most highly complex issue..... "
do you want more of the same, or a change"?
We all know the answer to that one, especially in red wall areas. Starmer is not going to make that mistake again.
He will need (at some point) to explain in his Social Contract that the government will borrow 'x' to deliver 'y'; increase taxes to raise 'a' for then to deliver 'b', specify the timescales involved to assess the progress, that achievement will be measured in actual terms delivered not in theoretical projections. These will be massive sums of money spread over various time periods, many of the majority who have to be convinced of its worth to such as them, will not see the end result themselves... and that is 'the rub' for the modern day politician, it's why 'target Net Zero' etc. is very hard to convince people who will be gone from the scene long before its achieved, to make the sacrifices now.
The only chance Starmer has is to make sure the
majority of people (those who vote at least) can see the benefit for them and not have to be resigned to their lot, but actually look forward to the resulting change.
Admittedly its a 'big ask' as many philosophers have told us... 'even those who will eventually benefit from change, are often opposed to it to begin with'.
However continuing to day dream about something that will not happen for eons, if at all, is wasteful and just as disastrous in the longer term as voting 'leave' was.