utdalltheway
Sexy Beast
If the Brexit voters had done the same the UK wouldn't be in the sh!t it is now.

If the Brexit voters had done the same the UK wouldn't be in the sh!t it is now.
Who’s yer man?I assume the silence from yer man from California is because he's off reading about the GFA and how the EU works?
Have many of Labour's current frontline figures have actually backed the idea of a second vote?
If I was a British remainer I would want the current opposition to be reacting to the shambles that Brexit has become by actually opposing Brexit and demanding a second vote. Watching the likes of Campbell and Blair lead the way would make me wonder why less objectionable Labour figures aren't fronting the campaign if they actually represent my concerns.
A quick look at the leader of the opposition's twitter feed shows him speaking about his role in the campaign against Pinochet twenty years ago but saying nothing about the campaign against Brexit that has seen hundreds of thousands of people marching in his nation's capital today. That can't be right.
This is such a bizarre train of thought. Anti brexit party get no votes. Pro brexit party ahead in polls. brexit must not be important enuff for people, I cant think of any other explanation. Maybe you can enlighten me.When was the last time a Liberal party got elected on their own to head the British parliament, over 100 years ago.
There is another party who are anti-Brexit, just that the leader isn't. British politics need a complete overhaul.
But I was more criticising the journalist and the sleepwalking of the anti-Brexiters towards accepting their fate so meekly.
This is such a bizarre train of thought. Anti brexit party get no votes. Pro brexit party ahead in polls. brexit must not be important enuff for people, I cant think of any other explanation. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Who’s yer man?
Who’s yer man?
Pretty much this. If there is a second referendum leave will win again, the best option people have is to somehow force a soft brexit.Not my business but if you do a second referendum a lot of people will start to think that democracy is pointless. When you lose a vote in you need to accept it.
Not my business but if you do a second referendum a lot of people will start to think that democracy is pointless. When you lose a vote in you need to accept it.
Not my business but if you do a second referendum a lot of people will start to think that democracy is pointless. When you lose a vote in you need to accept it.
Bear in mind that it was an advisory vote. It was non binding.
Pretty much this. If there is a second referendum leave will win again, the best option people have is to somehow force a soft brexit.
Absolutely no chance imo, I know a tonne of leave voters that after 2 years, have finally realised they were completely bullshitted.
It'd be 60%+ to remain in a re-vote.
Whether or not a re-vote is democratic or not... hmmm, not sure, I just know the uninformed public should never have been the ones making this decision. Fecking Cameron and the conservatives.
Remarkable that the Tories are still the most popular party.
I'd go for a reverse of the first result, 52% remain. A lot of people realise it was a sham but there's also a lot of "let's just get on with it"
From The Times todayAbsolutely no chance imo, I know a tonne of leave voters that after 2 years, have finally realised they were completely bullshitted.
It'd be 60%+ to remain in a re-vote.
Whether or not a re-vote is democratic or not... hmmm, not sure, I just know the uninformed public should never have been the ones making this decision. Fecking Cameron and the conservatives.
Overall voters said that they regretted the outcome of the 2016 referendum but only by a small margin. Some 41 per cent said that Britain was right to vote to leave, while 47 per cent thought that the decision was wrong.
In a choice between no deal and having a second referendum, 43 per cent would prefer the referendum, while 38 per cent chose no deal. In a choice between Mrs May’s deal and the referendum, 34 per cent would prefer her deal, 42 per cent the referendum.
Poll A GQRR survey finds no clear majority for any of the suggested questions and only a paper-thin margin for Remain if another in-out referendum were called.
For the growing numbers of people in the U.K. calling for a second referendum to reverse Brexit, public opinion carries a warning: Careful what you wish for.
Once considered a remote prospect, support has increased for a second referendum over recent months, as opinion polls show a small but significant increase in pessimism surrounding the U.K.’s decision to leave the European Union.
With Prime Minister Theresa May facing an uphill struggle to strike a Brexit deal that can win majority support in the U.K. parliament, campaigners want a second vote to be held if MPs reject whatever deal she strikes with Brussels. The opposition Labour Party has said it would support such an option if May doesn’t call an election first.
But uncertainty remains over the terms of any second referendum and the question that would be put to the public, as a new poll by the U.S. campaign strategy firm GQR Research shared with POLITICO shows the outcome remains too close to call.
Asked to choose between accepting whatever Brexit deal the prime minister is able to negotiate or remaining in the EU — the referendum question favored by the People’s Vote campaign — respondents backed Remain by just 40 percent to 39 percent, with the rest undecided, the poll suggests. Faced with a choice between May’s deal and no deal, those surveyed backed the prime minister by 35 percent to 33 percent, but with nearly a third undecided.
This is such a bizarre train of thought. Anti brexit party get no votes. Pro brexit party ahead in polls. brexit must not be important enuff for people, I cant think of any other explanation. Maybe you can enlighten me.
From The Times today
Not my business but if you do a second referendum a lot of people will start to think that democracy is pointless. When you lose a vote in you need to accept it.
Not my business but if you do a second referendum a lot of people will start to think that democracy is pointless. When you lose a vote in you need to accept it.
I would image that like in the last referendum polling would change during campaigning. So for Remain to win it needs a bigger starting margin of more than a couple of points because leave would campaign on the whole stopping democracy thing.Doesn’t that directy contradict your claim that leave would win again![]()
That's true but a second vote should not be entertained. We either have principles or we don't. We've seen many attempts to change peoples attitudes and it's not the people that is rotten. People fought and died at war to protect their lands and their people and the nations have been invaded covertly by playing on empathy using media and various propaganda. The borders need closing. Illegals deported. And we need to make our own laws. And then we need to take back (somehow) the ability to create money. So yeah it was an advistory vote but the spirit and the feeling was that there was no going back. What we see now are organised groups funded by whoever....and many people are very weak to all the fear mongering that goes round.
People that promote false ideology do not care about nations. If a nation cannot make it's own money, when in the past it could - you have to know why that is because only an idiot would allow anything or anyone to have power over it. You cannot be in debt to anyone if you make money. It's an important question. Because if you vote to leave, we the people have no say...and even when we do have a say it seems to me, some don't want us to have one.
Bear in mind that it was an advisory vote. It was non binding.
I keep seeing this, if so, why don't they just change their mind and cancel this madness?
There is so much wrong with this comment i really dont know where to startThat's true but a second vote should not be entertained. We either have principles or we don't. We've seen many attempts to change peoples attitudes and it's not the people that is rotten. People fought and died at war to protect their lands and their people and the nations have been invaded covertly by playing on empathy using media and various propaganda. The borders need closing. Illegals deported. And we need to make our own laws. And then we need to take back (somehow) the ability to create money. So yeah it was an advistory vote but the spirit and the feeling was that there was no going back. What we see now are organised groups funded by whoever....and many people are very weak to all the fear mongering that goes round.
People that promote false ideology do not care about nations. If a nation cannot make it's own money, when in the past it could - you have to know why that is because only an idiot would allow anything or anyone to have power over it. You cannot be in debt to anyone if you make money. It's an important question. Because if you vote to leave, we the people have no say...and even when we do have a say it seems to me, some don't want us to have one.
That's true but a second vote should not be entertained. We either have principles or we don't. We've seen many attempts to change peoples attitudes and it's not the people that is rotten. People fought and died at war to protect their lands and their people and the nations have been invaded covertly by playing on empathy using media and various propaganda. The borders need closing. Illegals deported. And we need to make our own laws. And then we need to take back (somehow) the ability to create money. So yeah it was an advistory vote but the spirit and the feeling was that there was no going back. What we see now are organised groups funded by whoever....and many people are very weak to all the fear mongering that goes round.
People that promote false ideology do not care about nations. If a nation cannot make it's own money, when in the past it could - you have to know why that is because only an idiot would allow anything or anyone to have power over it. You cannot be in debt to anyone if you make money. It's an important question. Because if you vote to leave, we the people have no say...and even when we do have a say it seems to me, some don't want us to have one.
Some of these folk aren't right in the head
![]()
Not my business but if you do a second referendum a lot of people will start to think that democracy is pointless. When you lose a vote in you need to accept it.
I dont think you should leave. You should use the power of the UK to fix the European Union. From an ecomomic point of view i think its a disaster. Majority of international markets are under nationalist pressures now. I dont think you can make a good trade deal with the United States and trying to compete against them its pointless anyway. The only part of the world where you can find an open market big enough to replace the EU its in Asia. But a trade deal with Asia is economic suicide.I don't think there will be a second referendum and I'm also not convinced the result would be that different as people haven't suddenly become intelligent.
However, in your opinion how long do you have to wait until people can change their mind. It's clearly not forever because the people overwhelmingly voted to join in 1975.
You've clearly not read many of Striker's posts in the CE forum then. They're always a fecking wild ride from start to finish.There is so much wrong woth this comment i really dont know where to start