Paul the Wolf
Score Predictions Competition Organiser
What does disgraced minister Liam Fox actually do all day?
He convenes a UK Board of Trade meeting every day, every resolution is passed unanimously as he's the only member.
What does disgraced minister Liam Fox actually do all day?
Pinches himself that he's been given such a high profile job despite being a complete moron.What does disgraced minister Liam Fox actually do all day?
What does disgraced minister Liam Fox actually do all day?
incompetent may is backOh my god..
"Post-Brexit Irish border could be like US-Canada, says May"
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...irish-border-could-be-like-us-canada-says-may
incompetent may is back
Oh my god..
"Post-Brexit Irish border could be like US-Canada, says May"
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...irish-border-could-be-like-us-canada-says-may
Oh my god..
"Post-Brexit Irish border could be like US-Canada, says May"
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...irish-border-could-be-like-us-canada-says-may
At the European scrutiny committee David Jones, the Conservative former Brexit minister, asks what the government’s legal text of its fallback plan for Ireland look like.
Hammond says the government has not produced a legal text. It is not clear to the government that it needs a legal text.
It's very simple, either the UK stays in the CU/SM and there's no hard border or if they don't there is a hard border, there is no other choice, it's WTO rules, why doesn't anyone in the UK blow this out of the water straight away instead of pussyfooting around. It's not even a debate or a negotiation. Moronic.
EU draft agreement said:AFFIRMING that the Good Friday or Belfast Agreement of 10 April 1998 between the Government of the United Kingdom, the Government of Ireland and the other participants in the multi-party negotiations (the "1998 Agreement"), which is annexed to the British-Irish Agreement of the same date (the "British-Irish Agreement"), including its subsequent implementation agreements and arrangements, should be protected in all its parts; RECALLING the commitment of the United Kingdom to protect North-South cooperation and its guarantee of avoiding a hard border, including any physical infrastructure or related checks and controls, and bearing in mind that any future arrangements must be compatible with these overarching requirements;
Stage 1 Agreement said:49. The United Kingdom remains committed to protecting North-South cooperation and to its guarantee of avoiding a hard border. Any future arrangements must be compatible with these overarching requirements. The United Kingdom's intention is to achieve these objectives through the overall EU-UK relationship. Should this not be possible, the United Kingdom will propose specific solutions to address the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland. In the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the allisland economy and the protection of the 1998 Agreement.
Yeah, it's all hand-wringing at the moment because the Tories know it's not feasible to implement a border while also knowing their base will slaughter them if they remain in the single market.
To me its very simple, no-one wants a hard border so don't have one, *****.It's very simple, either the UK stays in the CU/SM and there's no hard border or if they don't there is a hard border, there is no other choice, it's WTO rules, why doesn't anyone in the UK blow this out of the water straight away instead of pussyfooting around. It's not even a debate or a negotiation. Moronic.
So stay in the customs union? Good, glad we sorted that.To me its very simple, no-one wants a hard border so don't have one, *****.
Nope, just don't have a hard border, whose pushing for a hard border when the UK leaves?So stay in the customs union? Good, glad we sorted that.
The only way to close the border is if The UK leaves without an agreement.
Nope, just don't have a hard border, whose pushing for a hard border when the UK leaves?
Nope, just don't have a hard border, whose pushing for a hard border when the UK leaves?
rules are there to be broken, happens all over the eu.By WTO rules they have to install a border if they're not in the CU/SM , North Korea gets closer by the day and you said....![]()
rules are there to be broken, happens all over the eu.
Challenge the rules, unless you want the hard border of course.That's against WTO rules
With no hard border, everyone happySo not only would the UK have no deal with the EU, they couldn't join the WTO and would be vetoed out and wouldn't have a deal with anybody - hence being like North Korea.
Challenge the rules, unless you want the hard border of course.
With no hard border, everyone happy
With no hard border, everyone happy
While I have nothing against countries abiding to eu membership rules, they must apply to everyone and be adhered to by all members, until then they can feck off and stop using beurocratic bullshit as a tool. Somebody that is not willing to bend is making this more difficult than it need be.And in the mean time whilst we wait for every other nation on earth to agree?
Can't we kick northern Ireland out of the union... problem solvedSo the UK are happy to keep receiving EU citizens?
An English Independence Referendum? Is it that hard to imagine Farage calling for one, as 'the only solution'.Can't we kick northern Ireland out of the union... problem solved
Might be the only thing that could get Farrage and sturgon agreeingAn English Independence Referendum? Is it that hard to imagine Farage calling for one, as 'the only solution'.
Or leave NI in the Customs Union whilst the rest of Britain leaves, which is what the EU wants.It's very simple, either the UK stays in the CU/SM and there's no hard border or if they don't there is a hard border, there is no other choice, it's WTO rules, why doesn't anyone in the UK blow this out of the water straight away instead of pussyfooting around. It's not even a debate or a negotiation. Moronic.
rules are there to be broken, happens all over the eu.
Did you know that some countries have visa free status to Ireland but not the UK, and visa versa. So someone from Swaziland can travel visa free to Ireland then illegally travel to the UK just by walking across the Ireland- Northern Ireland border.Not really. The racists can't stop anyone entering the country
While the CTA has, for most of its history, involved an open or relatively open border, since the Second World War this has not meant that someone who legally entered one part of the CTA was automatically entitled to enter another part. Unlike the Schengen Agreement, the CTA currently provides no mechanism for the mutual recognition of leave to enter and remain, and the UK and Ireland operate separate visa systems with distinct entry requirements. In general, a UK visa will not allow entry to Ireland nor vice versa.
The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man allow entry to holders of UK visas (with some exceptions). Bailiwick of Guernsey and Jersey immigration authorities routinely check non-EEA nationals seeking to enter the UK to ensure they have valid UK permissions.
In July 2011 Ireland introduced a limited pilot visa waiver programme under which the normal requirement for certain nationalities to hold an Irish visa is waived for visitors to the UK who hold valid UK visas.
Nationalities that are visa-free in the UK but not in Ireland
Nationalities that are visa-free in Ireland but not in the UK
Irish visa-waiver nationalities
While I have nothing against countries abiding to eu membership rules, they must apply to everyone and be adhered to by all members, until then they can feck off and stop using beurocratic bullshit as a tool. Somebody that is not willing to bend is making this more difficult than it need be.
Can't we kick northern Ireland out of the union... problem solved