Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2018/1204/1014950-brexit/
The UK parliament has voted that the British government is in contempt of parliament for refusing to release full legal advice on Brexit.

MPs voted 311 to 293 in favour of the motion that found ministers in contempt and orders the immediate publication of the advice.

The leader of the Commons Andrea Leadsom told the House of Commons that the government will publish the "final and full" legal advice provided by Attorney General Geoffrey Cox tomorrow.

Earlier, the UK Attorney General said that Theresa May's government had "gone out of its way" to satisfy the call for the release of the advice.

The Attorney General's Office published a letter sent by Mr Cox to speaker John Bercow last night.

The letter follows a motion of contempt of parliament against the government submitted by opposition parties and the DUP last night.

That motion relates to a failure to release the full legal advice to MPs on the EU Withdrawal Treaty. It is now being debated in the House of Commons.

In his letter the Attorney General says that the amended terms of Keir Starmer's successful motion of 13 November were "extremely vague and it is not clear what is meant by them".
 
But it's not, customs checks still there which will kill the UK, plus services not covered sufficiently.
You still have no say, no seats in parliament , still pay contributions.

At least with May's deal the Uk is still in the customs union etc but doesn't have a say until NI is resolved which it never can be. There is only one sensible solution an that is remain in the EU.

My ratings on a scale of 1 to 10 where staying in the EU is 10.
May's deal is minus 27
EEA deal is minus 75
Canada deal is minus 256
No deal is minus 468.

Actually just saw this as well
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...l-brexit-outcomes-for-uk-say-eu-sources-rules

I said more like, not exactly like.
 
Surely you don't need anything to happen for a "no deal" dream, as since Article 50 was pulled, if nothing happens we just crash out?

"No deal" was indeed the default position if the government couldn't agree an interim deal (and get it through the commons).

However, if the ECJ agree with the Advocate General's advice (and they usually do), then I'd say that "no Brexit" now becomes the default position - if it looks like we are going to plunge off the cliff, we'll simply revoke A50 and cancel Brexit.
 
"No deal" was indeed the default position if the government couldn't agree an interim deal (and get it through the commons).

However, if the ECJ agree with the Advocate General's advice (and they usually do), then I'd say that "no Brexit" now becomes the default position - if it looks like we are going to plunge off the cliff, we'll simply revoke A50 and cancel Brexit.

Surely that will go against the "will of the people"? Be a huge backlash if that ends up happening.
 
The complexities and knots tied up across all this are so fecking complex that the public have no chance.
Dominic Greaves has just tabled a motion countering a future ploy by the goverment placed in the withdrawal agreement around what happens if they're voted down. That is, when the goverment go before the house in january to say a deal can't be agreed they've snuck in that the motion can't be amended.

Constantly trying to circumvent parliament and play games.
 
"No deal" was indeed the default position if the government couldn't agree an interim deal (and get it through the commons).

However, if the ECJ agree with the Advocate General's advice (and they usually do), then I'd say that "no Brexit" now becomes the default position - if it looks like we are going to plunge off the cliff, we'll simply revoke A50 and cancel Brexit.

And my point above is directly in relation to this issue. The goverment doesn't want that default amendable but it's very likely they'll now vote to ensure it is
 
Theresa Villiers MP wants May to go back to Brussels and hopes for Brussels to be "reasonable".

These people are beyond helping.
 
This has been 90% May giving away to those who her support her so far. Scurtiny indeed
 
Theresa Villiers MP wants May to go back to Brussels and hopes for Brussels to be "reasonable".

These people are beyond helping.
I suppose if we go back with we are gonna revoke A50 then vote in a bunch of ukippers in the EU election they might decide they would rather devise a different backstop exit mechanism if it guaranteed getting rid of us once and for all?
 
I suppose if we go back with we are gonna revoke A50 then vote in a bunch of ukippers in the EU election they might decide they would rather devise a different backstop exit mechanism if it guaranteed getting rid of us once and for all?
Even if the UK is found capable of unilaterally revoking A50 (which i'd personally very much prefer) I can't see it happening practically within 100 days. I think it would need a new government with a new parliament for that to happen, and it's too late for that. Then again I've been wrong about May and her government, so who knows.

I just think it's grotesque for a member of the British parliament to suggest that the EU's position is anything other than reasonable at this point. We've been through this shxt for 3 years now, even brexiteers are fed up with brexit, to think coming back to Brussels one more time would change anything is borderline delusional.

The British people deserve better people to represent them.
 
Surely that will go against the "will of the people"? Be a huge backlash if that ends up happening.
This. Whilst I’d love us to stay and cancel brexit - I could see riots. Shouldn’t stop the cancellation of course, just saying.
 
Back in the debate May says the backstop is not a trick to keep the UK in the EU. It is something that gives the UK some benefits of EU membership without the obligations. The EU won’t want it to continue for long if it is implemented, May says.

Without the obligations? You don't know what you're doing.

She is just openly lying now, she's lied before but now doesn't even bother hiding it.
 
Unfit to lead, lost all backing & support, no direction for the future, blaming everyone else for the current failures, clinging on to power due to narcissism & ego.

But enough about José. When will May resign?!
 
Back in the debate May says the backstop is not a trick to keep the UK in the EU. It is something that gives the UK some benefits of EU membership without the obligations. The EU won’t want it to continue for long if it is implemented, May says.

Without the obligations? You don't know what you're doing.

She is just openly lying now, she's lied before but now doesn't even bother hiding it.

It's infuriating as she's not even allowed to be called out on it in the house. Cameron stuck to script but May takes it one step further beyond diversion
 
May reads her lines from the page well enough but she falls off a cliff with her hands tied behind her back whenever someone asks her a question.

Vicky Ford, what a bellend.
 
I hate her. She fluked her way to Number 10 and now forcing this crap on us.
 
Boris sticking the knife in and giving it a good old twist.
 
Surely that will go against the "will of the people"? Be a huge backlash if that ends up happening.

It would only be natural to hold a second and final referendum once all the cards are on the table, since the initial referendum didn't specify what kind of Brexit people would get and it was decided by the smallest of majorities anyway. If no deal Brexit is indeed the will of the people then they will simply vote for it a second time.
 
Last edited:
It would only be natural to hold a second and final referendum once all the cards are on the table, since the initial referendum didn't specify what kind of Brexit people would get and it was decided by the smallest of marjorities anyway. If no deal Brexit is indeed the will of the people then they will simply vote for it a second time.
But for some reason, this would apparently undermine democracy.
 

It's almost impossible to be more incompetent than May but Corbyn seems to have no trouble.
fecking hell Corbyn. Just look at the massive majority Remain has in all these polls on the subject of Brexit or even if people want a second referendum.

We're still into polls, right? That whole 'Labour would be 20 points ahead if they came out as against Brexit/if Yvette Cooper was leader' shit still applies?
 
fecking hell Corbyn. Just look at the massive majority Remain has in all these polls on the subject of Brexit or even if people want a second referendum.

We're still into polls, right? That whole 'Labour would be 20 points ahead if they came out as against Brexit/if Yvette Cooper was leader' shit still applies?

That's not the point, there is no better deal to be had and Corbyn is going to make the EU do what exactly?
 
That's not the point, there is no better deal to be had and Corbyn is going to make the EU do what exactly?
So Corbyn goes 'this deal sucks, feck whatever Starmer has been talking to the EU about for the last two years, lets remain', the Tories all resign and insist they're replaced by their local Labour candidate and we can forget the whole thing and really hope nobody takes advantage of the voting public being ignored when it comes to the next elections?
 
Unfit to lead, lost all backing & support, no direction for the future, blaming everyone else for the current failures, clinging on to power due to narcissism & ego.

But enough about José. When will May resign?!
:lol:
 
MPs seek control of Brexit
Theresa May suffered a further setback on Tuesday as MPs backed, by 321 votes to 299, changes to the rules on what happens should the Commons vote down her deal next week.
The vote, which was spearheaded by Conservative Dominic Grieve and saw 26 Tory MPs rebel against the government, could potentially tilt the balance of power between government and Parliament.

It means that instead of the government having to come back to tell MPs what their next steps are - and MPs voting on that - they would theoretically be able to vote on what they wanted the government to do as well.
The BBC's political editor Laura Kuenssberg said MPs were asking for the right to tell ministers what to do if there is a second attempt to get the PM's deal through the Commons.

This could be critical.
 
So Corbyn goes 'this deal sucks, feck whatever Starmer has been talking to the EU about for the last two years, lets remain', the Tories all resign and insist they're replaced by their local Labour candidate and we can forget the whole thing?

No the genie's out of the bottle and can't be put back in but whatever Corbyn's tactics are or were, they aren't working. If Labour vote the deal down and it ends up as a no deal, guess who's getting a lot of the blame for doing nothing for three years . Him and his six tests , only remain passes the tests.
 
I think you guys should cut it short.....

DtmQzEuWkAEEU8b.jpg
 
Last edited:
No the genie's out of the bottle and can't be put back in but whatever Corbyn's tactics are or were, they aren't working. If Labour vote the deal down and it ends up as a no deal, guess who's getting a lot of the blame for doing nothing for three years . Him and his six tests , only remain passes the tests.
The Tories who called the referendum and have since voted for it every step of the wa...

Oh no wait, Corbyn. I forgot for a second that a referendum dreamt up by Cameron to try and calm a fight within the Conservative party was Jeremy Corbyn's fault, my bad. He did after all only rate the EU 7/10 on The Last Leg.

Given today's events, I'd love to see what Corbyn's tactics working looks like if this isn't it.
 
No-one seems to be challenged by anything they say in this whole Brexit farce, but this has been the same since the referendum.

They were though. I remember a BBC journalist interviewing him on the bus during the campaign saying he was lying about about what we send to the EU because of the rebate. They ended up arguing like children with Johnson continuing to deny he was lying as the journalist repeated the accusation at him.

As has been said before, we live in a post truth society where people believe what they want to regardless of the merits of the argument.
 
The Tories who called the referendum and have since voted for it every step of the wa...

Oh no wait, Corbyn. I forgot for a second that a referendum dreamt up by Cameron to try and calm a fight within the Conservative party was Jeremy Corbyn's fault, my bad. He did after all only rate the EU 7/10 on The Last Leg.

Given today's events, I'd love to see what Corbyn's tactics working looks like if this isn't it.

Three years come next April if the Uk leave without a deal, he said very little leading up to the referendum and very little since. It will be four years since Cameron tried to kill off UKIP.

So given today's events, what happens next, if the deal is voted down (which is not actually a deal but what the EU are prepared to offer which has been known since day one) either the UK revoke Article 50 and remain or it's no deal.
Which one does Corbyn want - he says he wants to respect the referendum result thus he wants no deal.
 
Has anyone asked a question as simple as;

“Do you believe that more than 50% of the country currently wants to leave the EU”...?

It’s 100% anecdotal but two things are true;

1. Nobody I’ve spoken to that voted Remain, wants to now leave.
2. Many people that I’ve spoken To that voted leave, now want to remain.

The government is an absolute joke.

I’d take Trump over May or Corbyn
 
They were though. I remember a BBC journalist interviewing him on the bus during the campaign saying he was lying about about what we send to the EU because of the rebate. They ended up arguing like children with Johnson continuing to deny he was lying as the journalist repeated the accusation at him.

As has been said before, we live in a post truth society where people believe what they want to regardless of the merits of the argument.

I wasn't talking about Johnson but in general hardly anyone is challenged by what they say. Very little is challenged even in parliament.