- Joined
- Jun 1, 2000
- Messages
- 121,652
- Location
- Dublin, Ireland
- Caf Award
- Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2005
Farage better not come over here
Farage better not come over here
I don't really understand where you are coming from when you say the current setup does not facilitate good future relationships with the EU: David Cameron told the EU the UK is unhappy with its current lot in the EU (which I think you have previously pointed out?) and they even sat around the table and discussed what could make the relationship better for us!
Is localisation of powers not a valid reason?
Sooo.... ehm... today is the big day ? Has the extension already happened? Wasn't it contingent on Westminster getting it's shxt together, or has that been ruled unrealistic?
My sympathy to the 47 million that did not vote for this and have been kidnapped for the journey. I hope one day it's the decency of those 47 million that represent Britain again, like it always used to do until a couple of years ago. Good luck.
Extension to 12 April has already happened. Further extension to 22 May is contingent on the Withdrawal Agreement being voted through the House of Commons tomorrow.
It won't get voted through. We are therefore likely looking at two possible outcomes:
1) No deal crash out on 12 April. This outcome is, essentially, Armageddon.
2) Long extension to A50 (perhaps 2+ years, to be agreed by the EU 27). This outcome would necessitate the UK taking part in this summer's EU elections.
The argument well they don't give a feck, its not their problem is useless and hardly a justification. Its pretty much the justification for letting brown kids drown in the mediterranean or in fact the brexit argument for having a hard border in Ireland. Not giving a shit isn't great reasoning.
.
Extension to 12 April has already happened. Further extension to 22 May is contingent on the Withdrawal Agreement being voted through the House of Commons tomorrow.
It won't get voted through. We are therefore likely looking at two possible outcomes:
1) No deal crash out on 12 April. This outcome is, essentially, Armageddon.
2) Long extension to A50 (perhaps 2+ years, to be agreed by the EU 27). This outcome would necessitate the UK taking part in this summer's EU elections. I think it's quite possible that, in this scenario, Brexit will never actually happen.
Is there any reason for the EU27 to agree to this?2) Long extension to A50 (perhaps 2+ years, to be agreed by the EU 27). This outcome would necessitate the UK taking part in this summer's EU elections. I think it's quite possible that, in this scenario, Brexit will never actually happen.
Farage better not come over here
No idea yet but “fight the shite” would be a great sloganWhere do I sign up to fight against this shite?
While our government is a joke, the 2 year timeline has been plucked out of an arse somewhere. No point pretending we’ve taken too long to decide what we are going to do, as there’s no precedent for such an event
But the EU doesn't want devolvement. They don't see it as positive reform.Cameron miscalculated those EU negotiations - so woolly were the changes discussed that it did nothing to convince eurosceptics to consider changing voting remain in the event of a referendum.
The renegotiations were mostly cosmetic - the EU paying lip service in a bid to help the ‘remain’ cause. Cameron knew it, he was just hoping to pull wool over skeptical eyes.
You don’t have to be a ‘leaver’ to know that the EU’s appetite for positive reform is as small as it ever was.
You can’t press on with an ever closer union and further centralisation and not expect discontent to grow - because no matter whether those fears are misplaced, they are fears nonetheless. And dismissing those voices only adds to the disillusionment. At some point you have to tackle it. A degree of genuine devolvement would go some way to securing the future of the EU - with or without the UK.
This is how politicians should be held to account:
This is how politicians should be held to account:
So what happens today? Or rather, what is supposed to happen, but won't?
So what happens today? Or rather, what is supposed to happen, but won't?
Sooo.... ehm... today is the big day ? Has the extension already happened? Wasn't it contingent on Westminster getting it's shxt together, or has that been ruled unrealistic?
My sympathy to the 47 million that did not vote for this and have been kidnapped for the journey. I hope one day it's the decency of those 47 million that represent Britain again, like it always used to do until a couple of years ago. Good luck.
Right. I haven't followed Brexit closely over the last weeks or months, and I don't understand anything that's going on right now. Like the British parliament, I guessThere's a vote on the withdrawal section of the withdrawal agreement.
Is there any reason for the EU27 to agree to this?
didnt they say in the past they were ok with the W.A but they had issues with the political declaration...Labour voting against the withdrawal agreement today is a tough sell really. Stammer out trying his best and with good reason but to the layman it doesn't look good.
I know you don't mean them, but there are a good few million who were simply too young to vote. They'll be graduating into a post brexit economy on top of all the other problems they'll inherit. Then there's those who simply didn't vote because they didn't feel qualified to make a decision, those too have my full sympathy (despite most of them wandering into the "geronwitit" camp these days). Even the gullible among the leavers, they didn't know what they were voting for... But I guess it's a lot easier for me to offer sympathy when I'm not as affected by all of it.I have zero sympathy for the people who couldn't get off their lazy arses to vote. Maybe this shitshow will lead them to stop being so ignorant next time, but I don't hold out much hope of that.
I've heard some people say this and fair enough. The problem too many voted despite not knowing enough.I know you don't mean them, but there are a good few million who were simply too young to vote. They'll be graduating into a post brexit economy on top of all the other problems they'll inherit. Then there's those who simply didn't vote because they didn't feel qualified to make a decision, those too have my full sympathy (despite most of them wandering into the "geronwitit" camp these days). Even the gullible among the leavers, they didn't know what they were voting for... But I guess it's a lot easier for me to offer sympathy when I'm not as affected by all of it.
Are the government attempting a monumentally stupid slight of hand? Are they 1) banking on MPs not realising that it is the WA which contains the backstop provision which so many Brexiters hate, and 2) that they think MPs won't realise that a vote for the WA is also a vote for the PD?
Not that voting through the PD means anything, as it can be ripped up and discarded at any time, but do the government hope that MPs won't realise they are voting on exactly the same thing they have rejected twice already?
Ian Dunt Retweeted
Jessica Simor QC
@JMPSimor
5h5 hours ago
Tomorrow, when MPs vote on the Withdrawal Agreement alone, they are in fact also voting for the political declaration. That is because Article 184 of the Withdrawal Agreement, in line with Article 50 TEU, incorporates it by reference.
41 replies . 351 retweets 361 likes
More importantly, are enough MPs clever enough not to fall for such a ploy? On the evidence so far...
IR£ 350,000,000 a week Geebs!
They will regret this. Even if her deal doesn't pass, it is difficult to see how May can carry on. There will be a new Tory leader who will have not been voted in by the people. Most leaders in that position will want a GE at some point to give themselves a mandate. TM did just that. With the polls as they were the decision was sound IMO. The campaign though was a total car crash that slashed the Tory majority.Labour voting against the withdrawal agreement today is a tough sell really. Stammer out trying his best and with good reason but to the layman it doesn't look good.
They will regret this. Even if her deal doesn't pass, it is difficult to see how May can carry on. There will be a new Tory leader who will have not been voted in by the people. Most leaders in that position will want a GE at some point to give themselves a mandate. TM did just that. With the polls as they were the decision was sound IMO. The campaign though was a total car crash that slashed the Tory majority.
The new Tory leader will probably be a leaver. They will run a GE campaign on honouring the referendum and Labour will not know what to put in their manifesto. They will be trashed for stopping the UK's exit when there was a chance to do so. Stammers argument is a thin veil covering the real Labour aim and that is to never agree with the government about anything at all.
And they point the finger at May for putting party before country. Total hypocrisy.