Feck are you talking about? Parsing your comment, do you mean that those people that got what they want should be against giving the country a chance to confirm its decision (3 years later and with new information)?
Personally I disagree and for those that do, in this instance they are potentially choosing to take the country in a direction that leads to turmoil against the countries wishes. How does that sound to you?
In the even that Farage had to go through with his campaign for a second referendum, I would feel exactly the same.... Point being, things change, people should have the right to reassess. Why is this so hard for some to get their heads around?[/QUOTE]
Because referendums are sold to the public as once in a lifetime occasions, and should therefore be acted upon first, before any further referendums are considered. That's what has happened since the 1975, the 'Common Market' has changed its now the EU, so another referendum was held, after forty years and admittedly by accident, but lets be clear no group of politician really wants to enact the 'will of the people', because by and large they collectively (with some individual exceptions) tend to hold the electorate in low esteem, as only being there to provide them with a job, but that's the nature of the beast.
Alex Salmond agreed this 'once in a lifetime' thing about the Scottish Ref and Cameron about the EU referendum... why because they thought they would get the result they wanted and both were wrong.
If we are to keep having referendum every few years (because yes, as you say things do change) then lets do away with GE's and only put forward referendums, let the public decide on everything, every time something changes, its nonsense and we all know it. People or the vast majority who want a second referendum is because they didn't win!