- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 22,195
Surely there's a wider choice than that. Although like the Tories there seems to be no choice except which idiot is the least bad. Grim.
Good to know
Surely there's a wider choice than that. Although like the Tories there seems to be no choice except which idiot is the least bad. Grim.
This is where you give us your pick.Surely there's a wider choice than that. Although like the Tories there seems to be no choice except which idiot is the least bad. Grim.
This is where you give us your pick.
What odds can I get on Yvette Cooper or David Miliband?
I think it will Be thornberry and she's also the bookies favouriteThis is where you give us your pick.
What odds can I get on Yvette Cooper or David Miliband?
Well if the bar isn't very high and you've 66 million other options then it shouldn't be too hard for you to give us just a couple of names.How would I know, but there are 66 million people in the UK, surely someone must be capable of being a better leader than Corbyn, after all the bar is not very high.
Well if the bar isn't very high and you've 66 million other options then it shouldn't be too hard for you to give us just a couple of names.
The inventor of imaginary wheelchairs for medical assessments sitting in 6th place. How terrifying.I think it will Be thornberry and she's also the bookies favourite
https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/next-labour-leader
20/1 and 50/1 respectively on your picks
Are you just bad at remembering things.This reminds me of when I went to some far-flung country and the chap said I have a cousin who lives in London, do you know him.
Who was the last politician you were impressed by ?On the other hand, those MPs I've seen on the news or in parliament, not impressed by any of them.
I think it will Be thornberry and she's also the bookies favourite
https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/next-labour-leader
20/1 and 50/1 respectively on your picks
Are you just bad at remembering things.
Who was the last politician you were impressed by ?
Fair enough.I've been to so many I can't remember in which one it was.
Hadn't followed UK politics for many years until Brexit raised it's head in 2015.
Richard burgon at 66/1The inventor of imaginary wheelchairs for medical assessments sitting in 6th place. How terrifying.
I'll stick with Corbyn, cheers.If the current lefty leaders are shit I think it's up to the lefties themselves to come up with someone better that they like, not ask everyone else what they think.
Richard burgon at 66/1
If there was only 66 people left in the UK he should still be longer odds than 66/1
To be honest, I think he would probably be a much better leader than Corbyn. More prgramatic, much smarter and has a lot more interesting outlook of what leftist economics should look like.You would support a John McDonnell-led Labour?
Honestly this kinda of stuff makes my veins explode. Just read labour alternative models of ownership -I’m ready for a hard left Labour leader, but all this ‘comrade!’ shit is making me tired. Capitalism is straining against its limits, and there has to be a socialist answer that doesn’t involve traveling back in time to the 70’s for answers. The Nordics seem to manage it just fine.
Honestly this kinda of stuff makes my veins explode. Just read labour alternative models of ownership -
https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Alternative-Models-of-Ownership.pdf
And
https://newsocialist.org.uk/labours-alternative-models-of-ownership-report/
The Labour Party is NOT trying to go back to the 70's.
He was voted in by Labour members twice. It doesn't matter who their leader is. The media will NEVER allow a Labour governemnt unless it is led by somebody like Blair who went straight to paying off the papers when he was elected leader, but frankly, that essentially leaves a shoot out between the Tories and the Tories reserves.But what is equally laughable is that the Labour Party can't find a better quality politician to lead them. Opportunity of a lifetime and they put Corbyn as their frontman... seriously?
The hysteria behind the possibility of him becoming PM is hilarious. He’s become this legendary boogeyman for adults.
What’s amazing is this fear mongering sources largely from the party who’ve done more damage than anyone in recent history and have placed the nation in its biggest constitutional crisis since the Second World War.
You’re not laughing because we are all seriously in trouble. I like Corbyn, but it’s clear that no Labour Party will ever be allowed to win a general election, whether it’s him or any other leader.How could he possibly do a worse job than Boris or May? And Cameron idiotically got us in to this mess in the first place. I'd prefer someone else but the idea that Corbyn is beyond the pale and Boris isn't, is as ludicrous as it is laughable.
So why aren't I laughing?
With a memory like yours Paul I'm not sure how trust worthy this information is.1960's. I forced myself to read that. We did a school project very similar to that in the 1960s regarding co-operatives and automation .
I have also experienced worker input into decision making in France - quel désastre!
Allowed to win..., but it’s clear that no Labour Party will ever be allowed to win a general election, whether it’s him or any other leader.
.
But what is equally laughable is that the Labour Party can't find a better quality politician to lead them. Opportunity of a lifetime and they put Corbyn as their frontman... seriously?
I don't know who would be in the frame and hadn't even heard of Corbyn before 2015. Surely they must have someone who has more sparkle, intelligence and charisma than him. If they haven't one wonders what the rest must be like.
With a memory like yours Paul I'm not sure how trust worthy this information is.
Look I get it you've owned two businesses, you clearly think your smarter than anyone else, business is built because of strong individuals, workers can't run business's, something something stop buying iPhones = more housing. Your never going to vote for the current Labour Party in any form because due to your own history and your class status, voting for labour is not in your interest. Which is fine(Although it's really not as capitalism is killing the earth).Because I can't remember in which country someone said something to me? My memory would scare you, not yet a doddery old fool.
I remember it very well, we even went to Ford Dagenham to see the latest automation, not on the original date because they were on strike that day, surprise!
The vision of 50 years ago . Amongst other things we designed houses for the future, year 2000 , haha. Nationalisation of everything.One of the funniest things was now that automation was taking over what would people do in their spare time and how people would have money.
As any good lefty should know automatisation itself isn't freeing if the class relationships are still the same. So the reason you were working 50 to 80 hours a week is down to again the C word. Sorry.I was working beteen 50 to 80 hours a week, so much spare time.
This is just a argument against democracy.As for the worker input - In France we had regular meetings with workers representatives, if it wasn't so serious it would have been comical looking from the outside. Most of the time they would argue with each other and insulting each other and very few had a clue of how to run a business. Bit like putting a referendum to a country and letting the people decide foreign policy, international trade etc when they haven't a clue what they are doing.
Julia Hartley-Brewer has 'hit the nail', so to speak. Whatever views people have on 'the Union' the fact remains the UK overall voted Leave and overall it should carry that through. Of course there were differences, in places Remain had the biggest share, but overall as a United Kingdom its was leave that won out. The problem is the party ruling Scotland wants to Remain in the EU, but not in the UK and if that is the majority view of the populace in Scotland then it should be able to do just that.
In NI it seems to be the other way around, the majority (it seems)want to stay in both 'Unions', the UK and the EU, this is not that easy to sort out because of Brexit and ultimately the people in NI will have to choose one or the other.
You’re not laughing because we are all seriously in trouble. I like Corbyn, but it’s clear that no Labour Party will ever be allowed to win a general election, whether it’s him or any other leader.
You’re not laughing because the choice of new prime minister is Boris or Jeremy Hunt. One who in his own words will decrease taxes on the rich and stuck up for the bankers in 2008, or one who’s systematic destruction of the NHS has left it wide open to be sold off (and will be)
You’re not laughing because In 4 months time we will leave the one source of protection the every day working class have Left. I really hope I am wrong about all of this, but I’m not and I know it.
You’re not laughing because it really isn’t funny.
That's a good summary.Julia Hartley-Brewer has 'hit the nail', so to speak. Whatever views people have on 'the Union' the fact remains the UK overall voted Leave and overall it should carry that through. Of course there were differences, in places Remain had the biggest share, but overall as a United Kingdom its was leave that won out. The problem is the party ruling Scotland wants to Remain in the EU, but not in the UK and if that is the majority view of the populace in Scotland then it should be able to do just that.
In NI it seems to be the other way around, the majority (it seems) want to stay in both 'Unions', the UK and the EU, this is not that easy to sort out because of Brexit and ultimately the people in NI will have to choose one or the other.
Look I get it you've owned two businesses, you clearly think your smarter than anyone else, business is built because of strong individuals, workers can't run business's, something something stop buying iPhones = more housing. Your never going to vote for the current Labour Party in any form because due to your own history and your class status, voting for labour is not in your interest. Which is fine(Although it's really not as capitalism is killing the earth).
As any good lefty should know automatisation itself isn't freeing if the class relationships are still the same. So the reason you were working 50 to 80 hours a week is down to again the C word. Sorry.
This is just a argument against democracy.
No I ran three businesses (not owned although had small shareholding in two ), businesses work by having the right individuals who are capable and know what they're doing. It doesn't matter their background as long as they know what they are doing. If the lowest classed worker has a brilliant idea, it would have been most welcome. As for class status my parents were cockneys, my father was clever and worked his way up from office boy making the tea to financial controller. I went to public school not because my parents could afford it but as you say I'm smarter than anyone else and didn't have to pay anything.
Too many assumptions.
I'm not going to vote Labour because I no longer live there but watching as the Tories go further right and Labour further left is sad to watch.
Sorry but everyone being equal and some being more equal than others doesn't work.
Democracy is not giving people who don't know what they are doing the possibility of changing the course of a country or a company , it is gross stupidity.
This is just a argument against democracy.
@Paul the Wolf
You went to public school. Christ if you told me at the start of the converstation I wouldn't of have to waste the last hour.
Public school boy who hates the Labour Party, shock horror.