DM comment section going apeshit.Was reading the Daily Mail comments for a laugh and a few people using the term "Drain the swamp".... But someone from Sunderland used it and a reply was "you're from Sunderland for feck sake"
Brexited | the worst threads live the longest
- Thread starter Silva
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
If the Supreme Court upholds the Scottish decision surely Johnson would be forced to resign?
Back to the court case. How does jurisdiction work with Scottish courts?
In normal times yes, currently probably not.
The current one is as good as dead thanks to Brexit though. That horse has bolted.
The people of Northen Ireland are being silenced here, it doesn't sit right with me that they can't have a voice be it a vote on reunification, sea border etc.
The south of Ireland is as bad as the rest of them in terms of following parties and outdated political lines, it's basically a yes to reunification with us despite what the projected financial implications would be.
It'll follow the same thought process as Brexit.
Would you say what your occupation is?
in 2019 you are still fecking over the Irish and use them for your end.
When do we start moving on? When they have no more use for Ireland?
Tearing up the GFA doesn't fall under the banner of a simple excuse ffs.
It's a court of the United Kingdom. That should give you a clue.
Yep, it's crazy. Even crazier that the DUP are the representatives of the 'Northern Irish people' in parliament. I don't know much about Irish issues, but think if the GFA breaks down, reunification is perhaps inevitable. It would be horribly painful economically though. Who knows if Ireland can even afford it.
He's not worth responding to really, though I bit. He described the Irish troubles a couple of pages ago to 'a few dickhead terrorists.' And that No deal shouldn't be predicated upon bending to their will. Or something like that.
It doesn't, Scottish courts don't always have jurisdiction over the UK. It's a very complex system due to the varying laws between UK members.
DM comment section going apeshit.
Is he trying to say we can't be sure if Boris told the queen that it was just to block remainers or not therefore it can't be illegal.
Not sure he's thought this through.
I'm not sure i buy those numbers, obviously it's just a poll but 98% of nationalists seems high.
I assume by nationalists they mean anyone from a nationalist background. In which case i know plenty of people who don't think a United Ireland makes sense any time soon or are undecided.
There'll be a United Ireland one day but i don't think we're ready for it yet, ideally it needs another generation or two to get rid of some of the bitterness and extremists.
I repeat. The court which passed judgement is a court of the United Kingdom. The court in question was the [Inner house of the] Court of Session.
I'm sure we would receive some tax breaks or sweetheart foreign deals etc that would help the transition.
Anyway, it won't happen for a few decades at least. Allow the older DUP mindset to die out, let the horror of being a whipping boy of Brexit to take effect and then push for a vote.
If you could stop lying, that would be great.
Thats very naive I'm afraid.
If you don't know, which you clearly don't, then don't answer. Thank you.
It wont.
It's very complex owlo.
I missed the news today. What was the reason given by the court ? (In layman's terms if possible)
Also whats the next thing Boris could possible lose? (Court case, HOC vote, etc. I think theres some safe money to be made betting against him now
)
Also whats the next thing Boris could possible lose? (Court case, HOC vote, etc. I think theres some safe money to be made betting against him now
)I missed the news today. What was the reason given by the court ? (In layman's terms if possible)
Also whats the next thing Boris could possible lose? (Court case, HOC vote, etc. I think theres some safe money to be made betting against him now
Hopefully an election?
Nah that's weeks away. He'll have lost scores of other decisions by then.
It'll dilute with the aging vote though. Every generation coming through has more and more catholics or voters who are open to reunification which is why the recent poll has reunification at 51 percent. Give that a generation or two and it will only rise as it has been doing.
I'll also add the other side is just as bad, it just doesn't have its central base on older voters.
I hope not but sadly you could be right mate.
I get what you are saying but the 'DUP thinking' will just move onto the next generation (a minority of course but then in reality those who really agree with the DUP are already a minority - they just have a lot of influence). Every year I hope this will be the year the DUP get what they deserve but it's just the same old shit again.
I found this on the Scottish Parliament site. How does the law compare?
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
I have now made a chart to help him out, as it's so complex.
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
I thought someone else had already said it was lawful
Yes, the Outer House [Initial court] - This was the appeal to that in the Inner house of the court of session. (Think of the outer house as the high court, and the inner as the court of appeal. Not 100% analogous, but good enough for this!)
It will now go to the Supreme Court.
How do you think they will rule?
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
I SUSPECT with the government but with some kind of footnote in the ruling that he abused power; though I didn't expect this ruling today, so I really have no idea in reality. Flip a coin.
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
Very funny. However it still appears to be incorrect.
You are right that Scottish courts are split, however your reasons are wrong. There are criminal and civil courts, you know, like most countries.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...Vaw0vj33rYvrbt_lgOaqpjQWF&cshid=1568211268954
The above PDF gives some information, but this case is extremely unique so information is not easy to come by.
Thanks though for the cat image, I am now focused and ready.
Unsure if you're being deliberately obtuse here or are just absolutely clueless yet running your mouth. I suspect the former, but will explain as if it's the latter and you are some toddler that is incapable of using google.
The Scottish courts are split into 2 sections. Ditto to tribunals. One handles Scottish matters, and the other (Under the authority of the Court of Session) matters for the whole UK. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of session. They can then be appealed to the UK supreme court if the court allows leave to appeal. I'll even draw you a nice 'WensleyMU friendly chart.'
Ouch!That's not what my Lib Dem friends tell me, in particular the left leaning ones, they suggest if Labour gets its act together on Brexit a number of traditional Lib Dem's could vote for them. In other words Swinson may attract some disaffected Remainer Tories to go along with their new carpet-baggers ex-MP's; however they may lose a lot of traditional members from the old Liberal wing of the party.
The same people tell me they think Swinson was a big mistake, but how they get rid of her they don't seem too sure!