Typically not if it’s filmed in public, as there’s no right to privacy. Although an attorney may be better placed to answer that in terms of each specific scenario.
Cop in America doing a bad job, again
- Thread starter Sigma
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
Typically not if it’s filmed in public, as there’s no right to privacy. Although an attorney may be better placed to answer that in terms of each specific scenario.
I'm saying that you seem interested in defending police and downplaying some cases of their wrongdoing.
I actually saw them blur a face this past Friday.
They busted some preppy white chick who ended up having a mobile drug lab in the trunk of her car. I guess they feared for her life because she just lost someone ALOT of money.
Someone has to be your foil.
Previous posts about coppers:
Etc.
The hypocrisy of you accusing me of agenda posting is just tragic.
You should know by now, any post where you condemn LE or agree with Eboue is ignored. Any post you make that isn’t outright calling every officer racist or worse means you’re also scum. Logic.
I'm amazed it's taking you and Choi as long as it has to lose patience with him. He's incapable of having any reasonable discussion.
Patience is part of the job. It’s been like training for these moments.
While you guys jerk each other off over your reasonableness, let me interject. I absolutely have an agenda, I've never denied it. I dont trust anyone who sees the incredible amount of monstrous police crimes and doesnt have an agenda.
Interjecting on two guys jerking each other off just seems rude.
Sorry for not showing you the attention you crave for a moment while talking to someone else. Spotlight is back on you now, carry on fella
Interjecting on two guys jerking each other off just seems rude.
Sorry for not showing you the attention you crave for a moment while talking to someone else. Spotlight is back on you now, carry on fella
You and ivaldo made this about me, I just wanted to talk about 20% of cops being outed as violent racists.
Just like the last “10%” stat you posted, it’s somewhat misleading as a statistic since they didn’t actually take information from every cop. If I think racism is bad? Yes eboue racism is bad.
And again, you don’t want to talk. I’ve offered thoughts before and you just then use it condescendingly from then on with posts like “maybe they just need more training hue hue hue”
Interjecting on two guys jerking each other off just seems rude.
Sorry for not showing you the attention you crave for a moment while talking to someone else. Spotlight is back on you now, carry on fella
Brilliant.It's called sampling. Just like how polls dont call every single voter.
If we can agree that opposing interracial marriage is a typical warning sign of racism, then the police are within the margin of error of the national average here.
somehow that doesnt make me feel better. And 20% didnt just make racist comments, they advocated violence against racial minorities.
Ivaldo gon ivaldo...
The cavalry has arrived.
ok that's extremely racist but what's the percentage of cops who don't understand how stats work
also the police being only as racist as the rest of the population, in a country as racist as America, isn't exactly a win
I mean even the passers by from the ones I've seen.
Well, they don’t blur spectators out in anything else.
I guess you've got a point.
It’s not “sampling” when the tweet you posted (which has since been deleted, wonder why) said the numbers reflected 10% of all current officers, when he didn’t realize the numbers were actually taken over a 10 year period. His math was also questioned in the twitter thread.
@Silva can read that too in case he was trying to refer to me in his cops and stats comment
Oh snapIt’s not “sampling” when the tweet you posted (which has since been deleted, wonder why) said the numbers reflected 10% of all current officers, when he didn’t realize the numbers were actually taken over a 10 year period. His math was also questioned in the twitter thread.
@Silva can read that too in case he was trying to refer to me in his cops and stats comment
yeah, long term studies are famous for suckingIt’s not “sampling” when the tweet you posted (which has since been deleted, wonder why) said the numbers reflected 10% of all current officers, when he didn’t realize the numbers were actually taken over a 10 year period. His math was also questioned in the twitter thread.
@Silva can read that too in case he was trying to refer to me in his cops and stats comment
Which is why I said “the last 10% article”.
This one has approximate 500 posts from approximately 3000 officers which is all the could recognize on social media from the approximately 14500 officers employed by the departments they looked at in 8 cities or states which met a threshold that only had to include bias...and that’s enough to allege 20% of all officers across the country.
So the other 747,000 to 847,000 officers are painted by the same brush because of that huge undertaking of research.
1 out of 10 is 10%
That same 1 out of 100 is no longer 10%.
@Carolina Red what’s the number of posters here who don’t understand percentages?
You tried, I’ll give you that. Poor effort though.
just wait till you hear about sample sizes
I’ll check buzzfeed for that too.
it's actually illegal for racist officers not to post online with their real names so they found all 500
you might learn something
That the paparazzi photoshopped Britney Spears photos to make her look 40lbs heavier.
That was just the second article listed on the homepage. Wild.
BREAKING: the new york times also has comic strips