Shouldn't happen at all. I've seen people talk about discrimination in here, and it shows exactly what's wrong with your reasoning. People (and clubs) should only be treated equally if they are in equal positions / equal circumstances - if that's not the case, you'll never be able to prove discrimination. Clubs are not in the same positions now, it would be more of a farce to treat the first and last team exactly the same than to differentiate between them.Well not it's not like that really as people pay taxes based on their relative earnings. Anyway we digress. We are talking about sports teams. You can't just make a decision to suit Liverpool and not have thought for other clubs in the same position, and those who aren't. It's not as simple as saying reward those who are achieving and forget everything else.
All the league can do is look at the fairest way to treat clubs equally. It may be they don't award titles, promotion, relegation (as in Holland) but lift prize money and pay out based on league positions to try and reward clubs that way. I don't know and neither does anyone here but just coming on to bang the drum that Liverpool should be gifted the title cause they are twenty odd points ahead and haven't won in for so long is ridiculous.
Anyway, you have your opinion, which imo is clearly wrong as I just explained. I'm gonna leave it there because nothing productive will come out of this discussion.