tomaldinho1
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
- Messages
- 18,635
What we’d give for one of those.West Ham and Newcastle still the best teams he's scored against this season in all competitions.
Currently just a flat track bully
What we’d give for one of those.West Ham and Newcastle still the best teams he's scored against this season in all competitions.
Currently just a flat track bully
He has the size, the power, generosity and technical ability...yet he still plays like a youngster in so many aspects, rushing plays, making an attemp were he should had pass, not keeping his head cooler when comes to finishing.
In fact he is kind of the new Torres, if him at some time will peak on Torres best seasons level in EPL (like he did in Benfica), we don't know, but he certainly has similar traits: the speed, the power, the extraordinary goal, with the most insane miss.
His characteristics don't remind me of peak Torres at all. Some of his finishing reminds me of Chelsea Torres though.He has the size, the power, generosity and technical ability...yet he still plays like a youngster in so many aspects, rushing plays, making an attemp were he should had pass, not keeping his head cooler when comes to finishing.
In fact he is kind of the new Torres, if him at some time will peak on Torres best seasons level in EPL (like he did in Benfica), we don't know, but he certainly has similar traits: the speed, the power, the extraordinary goal, with the most insane miss.
His characteristics don't remind me of peak Torres at all. Some of his finishing reminds me of Chelsea Torres though.
2007-2009 Fernando Torres shits all over Darwin Nunez. He was a pretty complete forward.
I don't necessarily mean this in a bad way, but he is a flat track bully. A really effective one.
Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.On one hand he's scored 18 which sounds decent.
But it's the miniscule percentage of chances put away that is the important thing.
Hojlund has 13 and we've been ludicrously poor for giving him chances.
Him and Diaz have cost them their season, Diaz against City and Nunez virtually every game since (defence takes blame too obviously)On one hand he's scored 18 which sounds decent.
But it's the miniscule percentage of chances put away that is the important thing.
Hojlund has 13 and we've been ludicrously poor for giving him chances.
Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
DisagreeNunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
I don't agree with this. I think Nunez would be Antony-esque for us, whereas Hojlund would fill his boots for them.
Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
No.Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
Horrible just like the finishing of the much better 25 year old “prospect”.Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
Do you have nothing better to be doing than pretending to be a Man Utd fan on a forum?Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
I believe it isHe's a donkey. I thought this was a widely held view.
He’s awful. If he played for us the media would have a field day.
This couldn't be further than the truth, Hojlund has the potential to be twice the player Nunez is.Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.
Do you have nothing better to be doing than pretending to be a Man Utd fan on a forum?
This couldn't be further than the truth, Hojlund has the potential to be twice the player Nunez is.
Who is Nunez, Darwin? a stronk dummy. He shoots hard. He has a fanboy thingy on TikTok. That's about it. No character, boring boring player, and when you need him to score a goal he hits the post beating the odds that would make the biggest casinos cry. "How did he do that?" you wonder but it doesn't matter, you lose points.Nunez is a better prospect and a much better player than Hojlund. I can’t believe we paid so much to get Hojlund.