Day 5: Sweden vs South Korea, Belgium vs Panama and Tunisia vs England (19H00)

That doesn't excuse them from not looking like a decent side. Just because Argentina, Brazil, Germany ballsed their games up? My issue is that Belgium don't play like a team, it's kinda like the Hazard show, which is very frustrating to watch.
They do lack cohesion and it’s a disgrace they haven’t addressed that yet over the years. Don’t rate Martinez at all. De Bruyne playing so deep makes absolutely no sense.
 
Is this going to be another 1-0 (probably of a penalty with the help of VAR)?
 
6 touches in that first half from Lukaku. Comparatively, Panama's striker has 12, courtois has 12, Panamas goalkeeper has 15 (the 3 closest to him). Say what you want a out everyone else and how they're performing. This is why he gets criticized. He is completely invisible far too often.
 
Lukaku's problem is that too many times he is just static in the box waiting for a ball to be played onto his head. Games like these you need the striker to be more involved, drop deep sometimes, try to mix it up but he just doesn't move.
 
All the star players are playing only for themselves so far, except Ronaldo. No surprise he's the standout performer so far.
That's because the team play for Ronaldo :D
 
From an England perspective, would love this to finish 0-0.
 
The others arent doing fine either. I still think it's up to lukaku to get involved more. So often for United he doesnt get involved and you barely notice him. Not a single player on the pitch has fewer touches then Lukaku does in this half so far, not even the keepers. No matter how the others are playing, that's on him.
You realize central forward can be the position with less touch in game? In certain system their job is not getting involved. Even fecking LVG a possession based master, described his ideal CF as having few touch, but occupying CBs, and expected to put away most of the chance coming his way

Edit: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/30/louis-van-gaal-manchester-united-strikers
 
Unlike the other big teams, Belgium have always been that underwhelming despite big names in every big competition. Zero chemistry between players.

They're focusing on collecting as many big names on the pitch rather than building a balanced coherent lineup.
 
This is another referee blowing every time a player hits the deck. Is it only the European refs that have a concept letting play go on?

This is rubbish. The Senegalese ref for the Serbia-Costa Rica game did a grand job of letting the game flow. You're being prejudiced.
 
They do lack cohesion and it’s a disgrace they haven’t addressed that yet over the years. Don’t rate Martinez at all. De Bruyne playing so deep makes absolutely no sense.
Agree. The only time I've seen De Bruyne is taking corners to be honest. He's not supposed to be playing so deep and by the time he's sprinted up the field, Hazard has already tried to take on 3 defenders or done something else that doesn't involve him.

Bring on Fellaini and move De Bruyne up (United bias is a possibility)
 
This is all Hazard, De Bryune, and Mertens. Belgium is such a disjointed team. Martinez is a joke.
 
Just look at lineup. They're playing 2 men midfield with KDB and Witsel. Since when KDB plays in 2 men midfield in a box to box way ? Mental stuff to just have all the big names on the pitch.
 
Lukaku's problem is that too many times he is just static in the box waiting for a ball to be played onto his head. Games like these you need the striker to be more involved, drop deep sometimes, try to mix it up but he just doesn't move.

This is also the criticism that I have of him. I've seen many comments about him not getting involved enough on his own, but I'm of the opinion that he isn't the kind of striker who will ever be getting lots of touches in the game. That's just not his game, and it doesn't play to his skill set.

Great strikers can influence the game in ways other than just being on the ball a lot - some of the most lethal strikers knew how to manipulate defenses with their movement, pulling defenders out of position to create space for their teammates and then making clever runs to exploit those spaces. Modern-day Ronaldo is the perfect example of this. He sometimes only has 15-20 touches per game, but he always is manipulating the defense because of his movement.

I'd rather Rom put in the effort to work on his football IQ and off-the-ball movement so he can put himself into better positions throughout the game.
 
Belgium, France and Argentina are all shite. Thanks for you time.
 
All the games in this world cup have been close affairs with low scoring and this is another one. Smaller countries are pushing the boundaries a lot more when it comes to the world cup with lots of niggly fouls creating stop start games with no rhythm at all. The only exciting game was the 3-3 between Portugal and Spain and that's because they're two top quality teams. Germany, Brazil, Argentina all failed to win. France struggled and scored the winner in the last 10 so there are no easy games and certainly no thrashings in this world cup. The next top game we will see is belgium - England maybe. Until then there will be more low scoring games.
 
Also why wasn't this wanker Mertens booked for his dive in the box earlier on?
VAR. It's there to review penalty incident. There is no point to book divers when they ain't tricking anyone. You can try but you can't dive
 
Belgium just reminds me of England when they were searching for ways to shoehorn Lampard, Gerrard and Scholes in one lineup, ending up with Scholes not in his favorite position, instead of building a balanced team on the pitch.
 
Just look at lineup. They're playing 2 men midfield with KDB and Witsel. Since when KDB plays in 2 men midfield in a box to box way ? Mental stuff to just have all the big names on the pitch.

Yeah, Dembele should have played in de bruyne's position, and someone should have made way for De bruyne from the front 6.
 
Unlike the other big teams, Belgium have always been that underwhelming despite big names in every big competition. Zero chemistry between players.

They're focusing on collecting as many big names on the pitch rather than building a balanced coherent lineup.
Bit like the Netherlands really. Though they ve clearly done a bit better the last few decades but similarly have suffered from having star stuffed teams without a lot of cohesion. I've often wondered how much that has to do with a perhaps perceived lack of national pride. Playing for the country rather than just playing for glory.
 
They have the desire to win the world cup because individually, they are players with battle-hardened mentalities and trophy winners. But when I said they lack the motivation, I meant that their skills are not properly utilized and so they don't really seem to have the confidence of the teams which are WC favorites.

And Argentina haven't?
 
Italy's biggest problem was the coaching and the Italian FA deserves all the profanities you can throw at them for sticking with Ventura for so long. Having said that, the squad was more than good enough to be in this WC, definitely better than some of the teams we've already seen.
I don't disagree with all of that. All sensible points.
 
That's because the team play for Ronaldo :D

Even so, it's better than pretending that the team doesn't revolve around the star player. I'll credit that to Fernando Santos.
 
Belgium just reminds me of England when they were searching for ways to shoehorn Lampard, Gerrard and Scholes in one lineup, ending up with Scholes not in his favorite position, instead of building a balanced team on the pitch.

They're incredibly similar.

A squad which on paper looks fantastic, but for a number of reasons it just never ever worked.

I expect Belgium to make it no further than thr 1/4 finals too.