The commentary is every bit as biased when Scotland, Wales, N.I. or Ireland play.You expect unbiased commentary during those games though. Which is why England games are so entertaining - the veil of professionalism disappears and you're left with Lineker's conspiracy theories.
Why?Well mute it or use the no commentary option.
Fatigue.What’s with all the big teams being shite so far.only Belgium played a somewhat convincing half of football, but Panama are barely a pro level team.
Michael Caley on Twitter, he ran it for the first half. Usually follow his stats as I think he's one of the main ones with the system
Did you not say you dislike the commentary? Or those people don't. It's stupid to just keep it in if you dislike it.Why?
Nothing wrong with England in this game, theyve created loads... bad finishing and a dumb pointless penalty conceded the reason this isnt 4-0 basically.What’s with all the big teams being shite so far.only Belgium played a somewhat convincing half of football, but Panama are barely a pro level team.
It’s fine. They’ll bring Fellaini on and play route 1 football*From playing like Barca earlier, England are playing like United now.
Rashford will be the key to unlocking this team.
The commentary is every bit as biased when Scotland, Wales, N.I. or Ireland play.
We need rashfoirds directness here, not sterlings faffing about
Never bought this as an argument in big international tournaments – it's just an excuseFatigue.
How did you feel about all the gushing over Brazil? Or the excitement over Mexico?But those nations doesn't have neutral viewers funding their channel.
There's millions out there who just want to watch a game of football, they can be biased but not overly so that it effects their punditry of the game
It's the opposite with this team. Good attackers, bad defence and midfield.England has always been a painful watch since Scholes, Lampard and peak Rooney.
Good defence, tactically and physically solid across the field. Just lack of flair and intelligence when attacking. Not so good for the neutrals.
Why is that?Especially when there's united players in the team.
Yes, it is. And it's great. No bitterness from me about it.It really isn't!
What other explanations do you entertain? Big players sparing themselves ?Never bought this as an argument in big international tournaments – it's just an excuse