Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber
Thus says Kemo
He is the only true Trequartista amongst English footballers currently.
A #10 in Britain is generally applied to players like David Silva or Özil or Eriksen, players who are creative "lock pickers" but not expected to necessarily score too many. The last trequartista / mezzapunta type I can remember in the PL is maybe Dennis Bergkamp or Matt Le Tissier, players who were expected to score more goals than they created but also didn't lead the line. Alli has that DNA, whatever you want to call it.
He is actually more like Gerrard during his time partnering Torres. All be it with superior positional sense.It's more appropriate to compare him with Rooney. He's just not the same type of player as the other three, especially Scholes and Lampard.
A #10 in Britain is generally applied to players like David Silva or Özil or Eriksen, players who are creative "lock pickers" but not expected to necessarily score too many. The last trequartista / mezzapunta type I can remember in the PL is maybe Dennis Bergkamp or Matt Le Tissier, players who were expected to score more goals than they created but also didn't lead the line. Alli has that DNA, whatever you want to call it.
Love seeing the word Trequartista in English forums.He is the only true Trequartista amongst English footballers currently.
Lots of people seem to be doing it, but for me it's horseshit. He's a midfielder. An attacking midfielder. He plays exactly as Lampard did. As Scholes did when he broke through.
His manager has harnessed his best attributes and told him to get in the ball as far forward as possible. But he's a midfielder. He has a responsibility to tackle and he creates a lot.
If you want to draw a Rooney comparison, feel free. You can even call Early Scholes, Lampard, Gerrard, and Alli '10's'. But Rooney was a center forward that dropped off. As Cantona or Sheringham did. The others are all midfielders that push on.
Irrespective of that, if people want to call him anything, they can. He's looking like he's going to be world class.
He has looked poor in the midfield, whether it was for England or Spurs, yet as soon as you move him closer to the opposition box, he's a different player.
I am, because usually those comparisons are with the players from the same generation. Alli or Pogba; Alli or Thiago etc. Alli or Barkley if we're scouserly optimistic.Is anyone really doubting that in 5-10 years time that the discussion could be "Who was best; Lampard, Scholes, Gerard or Alli"?
More like a shadow striker perhapsHe is the only true Trequartista amongst English footballers currently.
Alli is a perfect ACM for the 4-2-3-1 and couldn't play upfront as a second striker imho, in fact he needs space because of his long legs. Among the recent greats, I can see him being like Kaka or Rui Costa, if forced to make a comparison.
Like Kaka yes. Rui Costa was a true midfield playmaker which Alli is not.Alli is a perfect ACM for the 4-2-3-1 and couldn't play upfront as a second striker imho, in fact he needs space because of his long legs. Among the recent greats, I can see him being like Kaka or Rui Costa, if forced to make a comparison.
Kaka? Did you even watch him? No I am no talking about style or quality... I am talking about role/type. Kaka is similar to Mkhi role. They still most of the time stationed behind the no 9 off the ball. Alli is similar to Griezmann that he tried to ghost into the furthest position of the formation, which is forward role.Like Kaka yes. Rui Costa was a true midfield playmaker which Alli is not.
of course people start slating a young player when they're going through a bad patch.
No it was good to great for two seasons. This is his first bad patch and of course you're in here saying he's no better than Jesse fecking Lingard as soon as it happens.It was a 'good patches' on and off for the last 2 seasons. The 'bad patch' is his normal level.
No it was good to great for two seasons. This is his first bad patch and of course you're in here saying he's no better than Jesse fecking Lingard as soon as it happens.
I've been saying he's no better than Lingard long before his recent form. I've never rated him and i've said that from the start of this thread.
Yeah and you've been completely wrong that entire time.I've been saying he's no better than Lingard long before his recent form. I've never rated him and i've said that from the start of this thread.
I've been saying he's no better than Lingard long before his recent form. I've never rated him and i've said that from the start of this thread.
Puhlease.....Kaka? Did you even watch him?
Then its I who should be asking you if you ever watched Kaka at all. Kaka in Ancelotti's Milan played the exact same role Dele Alli currently plays for Spurs. The only slight difference being he was stationed on the right. He pretty much operated like a high breed between an AM and second striker. Milan used to line up with a 3 in attwcj. Kaka( think Dele Alli), Seedorf( Think Ericksen) slightly deeper and target man/center forward. He used to score a good amount because at times he'd be ahead of the striker. A perfect example being his goal at OT in the champions league when he embarassed Carrick, Evra and Heinze.No I am no talking about style or quality... I am talking about role/type. Kaka is similar to Mkhi role. They still most of the time stationed behind the no 9 off the ball. Alli is similar to Griezmann that he tried to ghost into the furthest position of the formation, which is forward role.
Rui Costa was a proper midfield play maker. He was similar to an Iniesta or Laudrup. A player equally comfortable and in deeper midfield as in a role supporting a striker. Kaka in comparison was more of an out and out attacking midfielder with technical skills, who concentrated operations in the final third of the field .He was closer in role to the likes of Baggio and Totti.Rui Costa and Kaka are different in style, but not the entire role/type.
Really?Puhlease.....
Then its I who should be asking you if you ever watched Kaka at all. Kaka in Ancelotti's Milan played the exact same role Dele Alli currently plays for Spurs. The only slight difference being he was stationed on the right. He pretty much operated like a high breed between an AM and second striker. Milan used to line up with a 3 in attwcj. Kaka( think Dele Alli), Seedorf( Think Ericksen) slightly deeper and target man/center forward. He used to score a good amount because at times he'd be ahead of the striker. A perfect example being his goal at OT in the champions league when he embarassed Carrick, Evra and Heinze.
Rui Costa was a proper midfield play maker. He was similar to an Iniesta or Laudrup. A player equally comfortable and in deeper midfield as in a role supporting a striker. Kaka in comparison was more of an out and out attacking midfielder with technical skills, who concentrated operations in the final third of the field .He was closer in role to the likes of Baggio and Totti.
Really?
Can you distinct a second forward from a no 10 from off ball movement. I am not sure where I put in in this thread or another thread, but I get showed another poster using Griezmann and Kaka to point out the distinct off movement.
Too lazy atm to go that route again so Imput Kaka compilation YT video and Alli's. Take note of the difference of where Kaka often found himself to receive the ball vs Alli (can use Griezmann too). Hint: a group has other player in front of them most of the time (second wave of attack), while the other group being at the tip of the formation (stay shoulder to shoulder or off ball running behind the defense line).
It's getting even more blatant watching their games, while goals should still sufficient to see.
You are mistaking Rui Costa's style with Kaka's as different role forward vs no 10. Kaka was less tasked in pulling the whole play together but not a final third specialist as you speak. Kaka was tasked heavily as ball carrier transit from deep midfield to final third which is similar to Mikhi.
Edit: the second stint Kaka is closer to second forward = closer to Alli. I give you that. However, the Kaka that made the name was different one.
He wouldn't make it into the city lineup, I do not think he wants to make a move to the bench.Everything about his new agent move suggest he is a normal footballer.
That is; he knows his worth and wants to extract the maximum financial remuneration for it.
I could see him at City or similar on £250k next season.
Could replace David Silva for the long-term.He wouldn't make it into the city lineup, I do not think he wants to make a move to the bench.
They already have a ready made replacement for Silva in Bernardo Silva.Could replace David Silva for the long-term.
So possible for him to run down his contract for that.
Thought he was more of a rotation alternative to Sterling out wide?They already have a ready made replacement for Silva in Bernardo Silva.