Do we need a new striker?

To be honest RVP is ageing and having knee problems, rooney has been god awful, hernandez is out on loan, so the method with the madness with this signing, we could do with a new striker
 
BwcBENPCQAAEaQJ.jpg
 
Hopefully Cavani on the way too. Or Defoe.
 
Speak said:
Partly because of our strikers and their lack of movement. Falcao's movement is better, he's more of a live wire and a complete handful, which the other two aren't these days. He also attacks the ball better than anyone we have. The passes wont need to be as precise.
He'll solve part of the problem, in my opinion.

Great striker.
Click to expand...

His movement's all vertical, though, as I mentioned later on in my initial post. Rooney and van Persie also offered us vertical movement against Burnley, but the lack of width meant that Burnley had enough bodies in the middle to not get dragged around by this. Falcao offering us more movement and a bigger presence won't solve much unless we have more width in our team.
 
We're becoming all fur coat and no knickers with these signings.

Woodward does love his fur coats.....
 
Well if we are getting rid of Welbeck and Chica then it makes sense slightly to have 3 world class strikers and a backup (Wilson) but is it worth getting rid of Welbeck and Chica to make way for Falcao? Wouldn't we be better looking at CMs?
 
How the hell does he aim to fit ADM, Mata, Januzaj, Rooney, Falcao, RVP in one team
 
I wonder where are those idiots who laughed at Scholes because he wanted Varane, Khedira, ADM, Xabi Alonso and Hummels. Butthead was more of a muppet (Falcao, Di Maria, Rojo, Blind and Herrera) and when compared to Scholes transfers they make much less sense to our setup.
 
From all the positions such as right wing back or right back and centre mid, we decide to pay 6 million and Falcao wages for a loan deal.
Poor Welbeck, Januzaj and Wilson. LVG isn't trusting them at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.