EdWeatherall
TFD
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Messages
- 14,838
Did Verstappen get any points on his licence for either of these incidents?
2 points for the brake check.Did Verstappen get any points on his licence for either of these incidents?
I think this too, at the moment the advantage sits with Max, just from reading this thread and other fans reaction no one will be surprised if max takes them both out as he has the the most wins advantage.I honestly think they want a different winner. They had no problem giving Lewis a 20 place drop a few races ago for .2 of a mm gap on the back wing while RB repair their wing after every qualifying.
Perhaps you should open your eyes if you've never seen me acknowledge anything Max has done wrong as I've done that plenty of times. Actually, in the post this thing started with I say I agree with a post that says Max was reckless in some corners, etc. But that doesn't fit your narrative does it? It's actually not really a response to Max doing anything at all. My post is just about Mercedes and how if you mention anything Mercedes did wrong on here you get posts like the one you just made making it all about Max. It's as if you can't talk about anything other than what everyone on here thinks Max did wrong, because then "you're trying to play a silly game of whataboutism".Because in a race where Max had 4 or 5 infractions (overtaking off track x2, rejoining unsafely, brake test, unfair 'let by'), one seriously dangerous, you're trying to play a silly game of whataboutism, including trying to make points that are in no way in violation of the rules (e.g. the gap before the restart). This race is one of the single worst examples of driver behaviour you will see but you want to respond with "but Valteri drove slowly". At no point have I ever seen you acknowledge a single thing Max has done wrong, I'm sure you're probably of the opinion that Brazil (and Spain and Imola and Monza etc.) were just 'racing' incidents. I happen to think Lewis' turn 1 was on the edge, but its not even in the same ballpark as any of those, so to suggest a penalty for Lewis today is laughable. Your constant 'Max vision' on this thread is well known and I'm not really sure why I spend the time to engage with it, but here I am....
Lewis pushing Max off the road for a 5s penalty![]()
I see we’ve already forgotten Brazil
The integrity of the rule book and power of the stewards is basically destroyed, not just this race either, all season.
All these drivers will be watching on and taking notes, 2022 could end up with stupid racing because they have let too much go this year. Let’s hope antics doesn’t get someone seriously hurt.
No, I actually didn't agree with how the stewards handled the Brazil incident (there's posts about it if you want to look back). But I don't agree with how they handled this either. Do you not agree that doing something with the sole purpose of pushing your rival off the track is worthy of a penalty regardless of the outcome? Is your point here "Max pushed Lewis off in Brazil so he has a right to push him off here"?
Wow.Why? Because I don't like Mercedes and am pointing out that they've done some scummy stuff this race which most on here choose to casually ignore.
- Bottas driving extremely slow during safety car so he would hold everyone up and be able to pit right after Lewis.
How is that allowed? No excuse for it really.
- Lewis purposely slowing down the field and creating a huge gap so Max had to wait extra long for everyone to form up, causing his tyres to cool down immensely which is how Lewis regained first position after the restart. A massive advantage obviously. If stuff like that is allowed these days nobody is going to want to be first on a restart, because you'll have no chance with number 2 and 3 having way better tyre temps. You're a sitting duck.
- Finally there's Lewis purposely running Max off the track at I think it was lap 43 (you can see him looking at Max in his mirror the entire time and going extremely wide) and Masi let him get off with a verbal warning for God knows why. Usually that's a 5s penalty.
Yeah you can say Max/RB did such and such and they were worse, sure, but that should hardly be a factor should it? The stewards should look at incidents objectively. Mercedes got away with everything I just mentioned. But when you mention suddenly it's all about Max/RB and how he's worse and you're just a Max apologist on here or whatever.
At the end of the day there's just no consistency in the penalties this season whatsoever. Whichever way you look at it Masi and the stewards have done a horrible job. Masi needs to go.
My thoughts exactly.Because in a race where Max had 4 or 5 infractions (overtaking off track x2, rejoining unsafely, brake test, unfair 'let by'), one seriously dangerous, you're trying to play a silly game of whataboutism, including trying to make points that are in no way in violation of the rules (e.g. the gap before the restart). This race is one of the single worst examples of driver behaviour you will see but you want to respond with "but Valteri drove slowly". At no point have I ever seen you acknowledge a single thing Max has done wrong, I'm sure you're probably of the opinion that Brazil (and Spain and Imola and Monza etc.) were just 'racing' incidents. I happen to think Lewis' turn 1 was on the edge, but its not even in the same ballpark as any of those, so to suggest a penalty for Lewis today is laughable. Your constant 'Max vision' on this thread is well known and I'm not really sure why I spend the time to engage with it, but here I am....
The lack of fair play is not enjoyable. The lack of appropriate punishment for unfair and dangerous driving reduces enjoyment.Don’t understand why people are so polarised over these two. It’s a competitive sport and it’s actually competitive for a change, just enjoy it!
There’s three problems with this:If the car in front of you is slowing to let you past, you have to go past in my opinion. Whether it's near a DRS zones shouldn't be a factor at all.
Else the car behind will end up hurting the race of the car in front unnecessarily. Say there are other cars trailing by a few seconds i.e. or if there's only a few laps left, the car behind would want to drag it out, and pass at an opportune time. Or you'll get situations similar to the one yesterday, when neither car wants to go first. Much cleaner to get it over with asap.
Similarly, when told to give up the position, the car in front should also let the car behind past at the earliest convenience, regardless of DRS zones.
Max did coast for a while before he braked, so if Lewis figured out what Max was trying to do, and neglected to pass because of the DRS detection line, then I'd feel he's partly at fault for the contact too. Even if Max is still predominantly at fault for braking a bit too sharply.
Max fanboy, Lewis fanboy or anything inbetween.. Yesterday was crazy.. I didnt understand half the things going on and how all the (absense of) penalties were lining up..
The only thing I really dont understand (regardless of any penalties or blame) why in hell Lewis stayed behind Max when he slowed down, and was even gearing back a couple times before bumping into his back.. I mean.. Why not just pass him, regardless of what you might think was going on?
1) he wasn't told Max was letting him pastMax fanboy, Lewis fanboy or anything inbetween.. Yesterday was crazy.. I didnt understand half the things going on and how all the (absense of) penalties were lining up..
The only thing I really dont understand (regardless of any penalties or blame) why in hell Lewis stayed behind Max when he slowed down, and was even gearing back a couple times before bumping into his back.. I mean.. Why not just pass him, regardless of what you might think was going on?
The whataboutism is because in a race where a driver has been found guilty of a brake test on a straight your comeback is that Lewis drove slowly when he was allowed to and Max didn’t know the rules so didn’t drop back to match.Perhaps you should open your eyes if you've never seen me acknowledge anything Max has done wrong as I've done that plenty of times. Actually, in the post this thing started with I say I agree with a post that says Max was reckless in some corners, etc. But that doesn't fit your narrative does it? It's actually not really a response to Max doing anything at all. My post is just about Mercedes and how if you mention anything Mercedes did wrong on here you get posts like the one you just made making it all about Max. It's as if you can't talk about anything other than what everyone on here thinks Max did wrong, because then "you're trying to play a silly game of whataboutism".
Also, if that gap before the restart is in no way in violation of the rules then the rules need serious looking at because it's completely unfair to create a practically guaranteed overtake on the restart like that.
No, I actually didn't agree with how the stewards handled the Brazil incident (there's posts about it if you want to look back). But I don't agree with how they handled this either. Do you not agree that doing something with the sole purpose of pushing your rival off the track is worthy of a penalty regardless of the outcome? Is your point here "Max pushed Lewis off in Brazil so he has a right to push him off here"?
So they came up with a "punishment" that has absolutely no effect or consequence. Donkeys running the FIA.
Stop trying to talk sense with Max fanboys, their golden boy can do no wrong.
They could have give a total of 20secknds so he finished 3rd or 4th this race and then not have the double wipeout = win for him scenario in the final race.It's a bit naive to suggest anything otherwise, they want the final race to be completely equal and for it to be decided on track & not in the stewards room at the race before.
It's a bit naive to suggest anything otherwise, they want the final race to be completely equal and for it to be decided on track & not in the stewards room at the race before.
They could have give a total of 20secknds so he finished 3rd or 4th this race and then not have the double wipeout = win for him scenario in the final race.
That's mad though isn't it, when you think about it. It's like letting an offside VAR goal stand on the penultimate round of games to ensure the title race is taken to the final day.
They've now set the precedent that brake testing somebody is a 10s penalty
1) he wasn't told Max was letting him past
2) It was Max who can't be trusted not to try to crash him off the track. So its not safe to assume anything with his history.
There’s three problems with this:
1) Hamilton had no idea he was being let through (he hadn’t the message at that point) so saying he was thinking about the DRS line cannot be true. From his position on the track all he can see is Max slowing right down. Does he have a problem? Is there an incident on track? These coupled with the fact Max is so dangerous, just passing him when he doesn’t know the situation is very risky.
2) The reason Max had to let Lewis through was because of Max’s own mistake. Impacting his race temporarily should not be a consideration in when to pass. Additionally, he was trying to manufacture an illegal “let by” anyway so he doesn’t have much of a leg to stand on.
3) No matter what in F1 you cannot just slam in the brakes in that situation. It’s incredibly dangerous.
Eh, it's hard to take aim at Merc right now with how Max is behaving. Yes, they slowed down under the safety car (which was mainly to double-stack quickly), but Max is literally driving so dangerously and getting away with it, of course he becomes the talking point. He's the one crossing the line.My post is just about Mercedes and how if you mention anything Mercedes did wrong on here you get posts like the one you just made making it all about Max.
Eh, it's hard to take aim at Merc right now with how Max is behaving. Yes, they slowed down under the safety car (which was mainly to double-stack quickly), but Max is literally driving so dangerously and getting away with it, of course he becomes the talking point. He's the one crossing the line.
Oh yeah, because the 10second had a huge impact on the race outcome didn't it. The stewards full well knew that would do nothing to the outcome hence why they didn't even hesitate to give that penalty. It basically sets the precedent that he can continue to drive stupidly next week.Well.. He is not getting away with it right?
He was punished for it every time during the race, and now also got the 10seconds penalty post-race..
Oh yeah, because the 10second had a huge impact on the race outcome didn't it. The stewards full well knew that would do nothing to the outcome hence why they didn't even hesitate to give that penalty. It basically sets the precedent that he can continue to drive stupidly next week.
Just like Max in Brazil? At least Lewis got a penalty in Silverstone...So... Basically just like Lewis in Silverstone?
if max wins next week, it will be a testament to his driving ability and he does deserve to win the wdc for that but when all is said and done, he’ll be remembered for being that bloke that was fast and not a lot else. but to be fair to him, he seems like he’s ok with that.
Just like Max in Brazil?
and let's get this straight, if it was vice versa in Silverstone, there would've been no contact, Lewis would've pulled out (as we have seen from numerous occasions recently). I'm not saying it was Max's fault, it was 60/40 Lewis' fault imo. It's like Brazil, if that was vice versa, Max would've probably crashed out the race and Horner would've cried at Hamilton for trying to "kill" Max.
He got "punished" sure, but brake testing an f1 car at those speeds should be deemed a higher penalty let's be honest. Can you imagine if Hamilton did that and the outrage Horner would cause over it?Im not trying to argue with you Max did dangerous driving or make this a Max vs Lewis thing..
All Im implying is that Max was punished during the race mulitple times everytime he did the dangerous driving and he now got a post-match punishment which is in line with other punishments during the season...
I think the bigger issue is Max has taken none of it on board. He thinks he's being unfairly penalised.Im not trying to argue with you Max did dangerous driving or make this a Max vs Lewis thing..
All Im implying is that Max was punished during the race mulitple times everytime he did the dangerous driving and he now got a post-match punishment which is in line with other punishments during the season...
Perhaps you should open your eyes if you've never seen me acknowledge anything Max has done wrong as I've done that plenty of times. Actually, in the post this thing started with I say I agree with a post that says Max was reckless in some corners, etc. But that doesn't fit your narrative does it? It's actually not really a response to Max doing anything at all. My post is just about Mercedes and how if you mention anything Mercedes did wrong on here you get posts like the one you just made making it all about Max. It's as if you can't talk about anything other than what everyone on here thinks Max did wrong, because then "you're trying to play a silly game of whataboutism".
Also, if that gap before the restart is in no way in violation of the rules then the rules need serious looking at because it's completely unfair to create a practically guaranteed overtake on the restart like that.
No, I actually didn't agree with how the stewards handled the Brazil incident (there's posts about it if you want to look back). But I don't agree with how they handled this either. Do you not agree that doing something with the sole purpose of pushing your rival off the track is worthy of a penalty regardless of the outcome? Is your point here "Max pushed Lewis off in Brazil so he has a right to push him off here"?
But the outcome of the championship would still be decided in the final race, if anything it would make it a better race as I feel now there’s a good chance both cars don’t finish but they get their new championSorry, you're naive to think that they would do anything else. I had it down as a fine or reprimand so that it would go into the final round. Remember this is an entertainment business dressed as a sport. They would never do anything that would disrupt the narrative of the final race.
Max is lucky to walk away with just a 10 second penalty if I'm honest. Some of the driving this year has set precedents across the board, but I didn't see them doing anything that would jeopardise the final race in that it would go in completely equal.
Did they think this way when sending Hamilton to the back of the grid at Brazil though?It's a bit naive to suggest anything otherwise, they want the final race to be completely equal and for it to be decided on track & not in the stewards room at the race before.
Nah there's nothing naive about wanting rules applied the same to everyone. It's just the FIA is a joke, nothing more to it. They could well be deciding the WC by not taking action too.It's a bit naive to suggest anything otherwise, they want the final race to be completely equal and for it to be decided on track & not in the stewards room at the race before.
Didn’t want to blast past because it’s completely unusual for someone to suddenly go slow, hence what if there was an accident up ahead? Maybe thought a flag had just come in? Honestly it really isn’t that difficult to understand why he might not immediately just sail past.Max fanboy, Lewis fanboy or anything inbetween.. Yesterday was crazy.. I didnt understand half the things going on and how all the (absense of) penalties were lining up..
The only thing I really dont understand (regardless of any penalties or blame) why in hell Lewis stayed behind Max when he slowed down, and was even gearing back a couple times before bumping into his back.. I mean.. Why not just pass him, regardless of what you might think was going on?