kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
It has to be Ribery for me, even if bla bla he isn't individually better than Ronaldo/Messi he deserves it more than them.
It's a fair point that he's more creative in the hole, much like he was the previous year at Milan, but I'm not sure where his technique falls down compared to Ribery or Ronaldo. In fact that aspect of his game is what sets him apart from other strikers, despite playing in France - such is his propensity to pull off the spectacular. Particularly when he combines it with heavy goalscoring - 43 last year, 16 so far this season. Throw in the good but not outstanding calendar years from Messi and Ronaldo and there's no reason why he shouldn't be in the mixer for the award.Yeah and I'm not saying he's boring to watch but he can still go to sleep at times, wake up, hit score a couple and go back to sleep. Over a period of 90 minutes or a 38 game season I'm not too keen on watching him day in day out. He'd make a great highlight package of course but overall his game is not at the level of the top 3 in terms or technique or elegance. I watched him live in May as well and he hardly did anything, while Menez ran the show. Obviously not just basing it on that game but it's what he has the tendency of.
His creative side was also not that much on show last season as he didn't have anyone to lead the line, now with Cavani there that would be displayed more and yes that is quite good to watch. Him up front makes him less entertaining to be frank.
This especially annoys me. Vidal was clearly Juve's key player last season, after Pirlo's form fell away after the Euros.Pirlo over Vidal and Mourinho over Simeone reflects the momentum of previously generated publicity, and how it always influences these awards more than performances during the last 12 months. Much like standing-award-nominee John Terry in recent seasons.
It's a fair point that he's more creative in the hole, much like he was the previous year at Milan, but I'm not sure where his technique falls down compared to Ribery or Ronaldo. In fact that aspect of his game is what sets him apart from other strikers, despite playing in France - such is his propensity to pull off the spectacular. Particularly when he combines it with heavy goalscoring - 43 last year, 16 so far this season. Throw in the good but not outstanding calendar years from Messi and Ronaldo and there's no reason why he shouldn't be in the mixer for the award.
I wouldn't be surprised if a Bayern player, namely Ribery, would win this. I'm sure Real Madrid wouldn't mind Messi winning it. They hardly need him extra motivated.
How is Wenger nominated for manager of the year and Simeone isn't?! That's just plain ridiculous.
I think Mourinho is the worst one in that list, but with him it looks like even loosing the dressing room and missing out on all titles with the biggest club in the world is an award nomination worthy year. Simeone missing out is really shocking though, I agree.How is Wenger nominated for manager of the year and Simeone isn't?! That's just plain ridiculous.
I think Gündogan and Reus were just unlucky that already a lot German and Bundesliga players were nominated because of Bayern's treble and Fifa won't let the list be dominated by one country or league.And how is there only Dortmund player in the whole list?
As far as I know, until 2009 the Ballon d'Or was only an award for the best player. In 2010 the FIFA award merged with France football's Ballon d'Or and they also created the FIFA world coach of the year, so Mourinho in 2010 was the first one to win it. There are other manager of the year awards, I'm sure Ferguson won some, but nothing official given by FIFA.Anyway, anyone other than Heynckes winning the manager award will be a complete joke. Though did Ferguson win one of these? I'm guessing for the 99 season. I wonder if they'll give it to him as a kind of lifetime achievement award.
I think Gündogan and Reus were just unlucky that already a lot German and Bundesliga players were nominated because of Bayern's treble and Fifa won't let the list be dominated by one country or league.
Mourinho and Xavi seems to be on auto-inclusion list. Seriously there is no reason why they are nominated.How are Wenger and Mourinho in this list but Simeone and Vilanova not? And how is there only Dortmund player in the whole list?
I think Gündogan and Reus were just unlucky that already a lot German and Bundesliga players were nominated because of Bayern's treble and Fifa won't let the list be dominated by one country or league.
Isn't that world XI a different vote? I think FIFPro organises that and every player registered for one of participating countries is allowed to vote. I agree that it was a joke last year with not a single player from one of the CL finalists making that XI, but I think we can't blame FIFA for it.I also don´t know if a wanted versatility of countries and leagues is really a factor for the Fifa. Remember their world XI 2012? You know, the one with exclusively players from the Primera Division and 90% (!) from two clubs?
I can actually understand that Gündogan did not make the list. Given that this is more about the calendar year 2013 than the last season, Gündogan was simply unlucky to be injured for pretty much the whole current season so far, so he could not show his qualities recently. Same could be said about Lukasz Piszczek. If he would not had a needed surgery in the summer and could have held his level from the first half of 2013, he should be on there aswell.
Reus should be on it, though. He really arrived at Dortmund in the winter and has gotten even better since then, being Dortmund´s best player so far in this season. He also had a lot of good games for Germany. His non-consideration gets even weirder when a light version of him (Eden Hazard) somehow made the cut.
I also don´t know if a wanted versatility of countries and leagues is really a factor for the Fifa. Remember their world XI 2012? You know, the one with exclusively players from the Primera Division and 90% (!) from two clubs?
I wish this whole thing would be less about politics. What would be left would be the simple fact that the most important game of the year was rightfully played by two German clubs and even more importantly two teams with strong German cores.
Regarding the actual winner I really hope Ribery gets it. Messi is still the best player in the world, but he was simply not the best performing one in this year. This title goes clearly to the French.
Ribery is as a player still a little bit underrated. What is even more underrated is his role and importance for Bayern Munich, though. Even with their mega squad they still lose a lot of quality and creativity when he is not on the pitch. Easily one of their three player, who are the hardest to replace and the clear stand out player among a team full of top performers.
The award for the coach should be an obvious choice. Nobody deserves it more than Heynckes, who created a monster of a team and still gets too little credit for it in my eyes. Runner ups should be Klopp and Conte.
I can actually understand that Gündogan did not make the list. Given that this is more about the calendar year 2013 than the last season, Gündogan was simply unlucky to be injured for pretty much the whole current season so far, so he could not show his qualities recently. Same could be said about Lukasz Piszczek. If he would not had a needed surgery in the summer and could have held his level from the first half of 2013, he should be on there aswell.
Reus should be on it, though. He really arrived at Dortmund in the winter and has gotten even better since then, being Dortmund´s best player so far in this season. He also had a lot of good games for Germany. His non-consideration gets even weirder when a light version of him (Eden Hazard) somehow made the cut.
I also don´t know if a wanted versatility of countries and leagues is really a factor for the Fifa. Remember their world XI 2012? You know, the one with exclusively players from the Primera Division and 90% (!) from two clubs?
I wish this whole thing would be less about politics. What would be left would be the simple fact that the most important game of the year was rightfully played by two German clubs and even more importantly two teams with strong German cores.
Regarding the actual winner I really hope Ribery gets it. Messi is still the best player in the world, but he was simply not the best performing one in this year. This title goes clearly to the French.
Ribery is as a player still a little bit underrated. What is even more underrated is his role and importance for Bayern Munich, though. Even with their mega squad they still lose a lot of quality and creativity when he is not on the pitch. Easily one of their three player, who are the hardest to replace and the clear stand out player among a team full of top performers.
The award for the coach should be an obvious choice. Nobody deserves it more than Heynckes, who created a monster of a team and still gets too little credit for it in my eyes. Runner ups should be Klopp and Conte.
France Football (the newspaper) and FIFA make that list and send it to the players, coaches and journalists who are allowed to vote.I'm not sure how the shortlist is developed. Is it the top 23 from all the votes that were cast by players, coaches and journalists? Or is it put together by some FIFA committee? There are idiots involved either way.
France Football (the newspaper) and FIFA make that list and send it to the players, coaches and journalists who are allowed to vote.
Pretty sure you can make a case for all three, whoever wins it is a deserved winner, imo. Messi is still the best player, but he missed a lot big games or underperformed because he wasn't fit. Sucks for him, but it matters. Ronaldo scored the most goals this calender year, always a strong case. Ribery was the best player in a treble winning team, that performed significantly worse without him. I'd argue that Ribery also performed best for his nationalteam out of those three, he's been amazing for France lately. It's one of those seasons where it really shouldn't be clear-cut.Even though Messi has won it 4 times on the trot, I cannot see beyond a Ribery win this time. He has done it all in a treble-winning year and even though Messi has won La Liga, and both Messi and Ronaldo have scored lots of goals to help their respective games, it can only go deservedly to Ribery. A brilliant player and he could have a brilliant 2014 should France finally get to the final and win.
Shouldn't it be for the player who performed best throughout the whole calender year? And not who's the best in theory when fully fit, even though he clearly underperformed in basically all big games in 2013? If you think he deserves it because of his performances, fair enough. He doesn't deserve it because he's the best player in general though. That would be stupid.Ah come on, it should be Messi. This is the award for the best player in the world, right? So that's Messi. It's actually very simple. Best player in the world = Lionel Messi.
Ah come on, it should be Messi. This is the award for the best player in the world, right? So that's Messi. It's actually very simple. Best player in the world = Lionel Messi.
No, that's not how it works. It works by awarding the best player in the world in a calendar year, not the best player by default. And as far as I'm aware, Ribery has had a superior year to Ronaldo and Messi.
No, that's not how it works. It works by awarding the best player in the world in a calendar year, not the best player by default. And as far as I'm aware, Ribery has had a superior year to Ronaldo and Messi.
Ribery didn't have a superior year to Messi and Ronaldo. Bayern had a superior year to Barcelona and Real Madrid..
IMO it should be Messi, Ronaldo, Ribery, in that order, although I wouldn't mind if Ribery wins it..
However, the race is far from decided.. IMO if Messi picks it up and gets back to his pre-injury level, I think he'll win it.. But if his slump continues till the end of the year, then Ribery will win it. If Ronaldo breaks the calendar year goal record, then he'll be in the mix too.
I think that's debatable.
Messi has struggled to get to optimum level for "long" periods this year. He's really not been that great this year, certainly not enough to win the Ballon d'Or. And this season, Neymar, if we're judging on performances, has been better. "Tata" has played Messi on the RW a few times and he's looked a bit off, though he's been defensively good (El Clasico performance was the best defensive performance by Messi in a long, long time).
Ronaldo has probably been slightly better this year than Messi, but his team were embarrassed in the CdR final and they failed to reach the final of the CL. He's had a very good start to the season, though, so that could prove to be irrelevant.
Ribery has had his best year in football. He was excellent in the Bundesliga, both legs vs. Barcelona in the semi-final and though the numbers don't show it, his defensive work was fantastic. In the UCL final, though he should have probably been sent off, he provided a pre-assist to Robben for the Mandzukic goal and set up the winner with a delightful back heel. In the Super Cup, he scored the equaliser and caused problems for Chelsea, often helped by Alaba to create a 2 v 1 situation. This season, he's adapted well to Guardiola's system and has had an excellent start.
There's more confidence in the way Ribery dribbles and more intelligence when he's on the ball. He's transformed from an individualistic player to a team player and mixed with his output in 2013, he should win it. In contrast, Messi's pressing was non-existent, while Ronaldo's lack of defensive effort was exploited.
Based on 2013, I would have Ribery, Ronaldo, Messi. But I feel goal output still plays too much of a role. If it's based on this, then it should be Ronaldo, Messi, Ribery. As I mentioned, the difference between Ronaldo and Messi hasn't been big, they've been at a very close level since 2009, and no disrespect intended to Ronaldo, but I would put that down to injuries on Messi's behalf. However, as you've stated, there's still a couple of months, so we'll see how everything pans out, but I think we're going to have a different winner this time.
The Club World Cup is at the end of the year, too, so that could play a big role.
Usually who's in the top 3 will already be annouced by the end of november, then only who finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd in January. So the voting is done in the next 2-3 weeks, what happens after that like for example the club world cup can't influence the vote anymore. The world cup knockout games maybe could still have an impact, for example if Ronaldo fails to qualify with Portugal and a lot of voters haven't sent their vote in by then. He was awful for large parts of Portugal's qualification games and really needs to get his act together for those 2 games, that really should count against him.
By the way I really don't understand the point that Ribery was lifted by Bayern's team performances while Ronaldo seemingly performed brilliantly despite Real Madrid's circus, because when played out of their comfort zone for the nationalteam, Ribery clearly outperformed Ronaldo indivdiually so far and it was far from easy for Ribery to become the leader for the nationalteam after the drama at the last world cup. A few of the French users on the Caf already described in this thread how Ribery lifted the team, that really should count for him in comparison to Ronaldo.
If it was purely down to individual performance, rather than the fairly obvious unspoken 'your team has to have won stuff' clause, I'd give it to Ronaldo. By his own high standards Messi has been a bit on and off recently, and for me Ronaldo has been better in individual terms than Ribery.