AttackingFlair
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,654
I still think he's more effective from LB. Modric on the left with Bale is a good combo.

I still think he's more effective from LB. Modric on the left with Bale is a good combo.
I still think he's more effective from LB. Modric on the left with Bale is a good combo.
You do realise you completely made that definition up yourself, right?!
Rio's a special defender.
Not it doesn't. Everyone including yourself knows Harry prefers 4-4-2 above all else. Minus Bale he would be still playing that formation against all opposition. Because he would be able to accomodate Modric or RVDV on the left of his favured 4 man midifeld structure.I've pointed out that Spurs finished 4th playing mainly 4-4-2 - this alone makes your mention of Harry's "criminal use" of 4-4-2 way off beam.
The real truth is you get to play it often now because you have Bale yet can't bench one of Modric & RVDV.The point is that we've played this way more often since VdV has arrived since he's better suited to playing in a free role in behind the striker than any other Spurs midfielder, Modric included, and a 5-man midfield allows wider scope for both VdV and Modric to play in the same starting XI.
You have already confessed you hardly ever played 4-5-1 till this season. You are contradicting yourself.Nor is it the case that if Bale was at LB we wouldn't ever play 4-5-1. Modric has played in LM many times for Spurs, and Huddlestone + Jenas/Sandro/Palacios playing behind VdV, with Lennon as RW, is a perfectly feasible midfield line-up.
I've done no such thing. He would be the one partnered with RVDV alot if he was fit.You also forget that Defoe has been injured for a while now.
I doubt it. RVDV and Modric are unlikely to be benched or paired together in a 2 man midfield. Redknapp isnt that tactically naive.When he returns it's certainly possible that we'll play 4-4-2 in many games again, since both Modric and VdV can play both anywhere across the midfield, left, centre or right.
United should sign him; he will be pricey but his value is only going to up. I like the idea of him on set pieces for United
Well neither RVD nor Modric can play his role.Lennon isn't undroppable.
If Cole's the best left back in the world he's 'special'.
Vidic and Rio are both 'special' if they are the best defenders in the world.
VDS has been a 'special' keeper these last 3 seasons. Keepers that weren't 'special' cost us big time in the CL for a few seasons and have lost Arsenal consistently.
If you're one of the best at what you do you're special.
Different rules for players in different positions doesn't make any sense unless the player is one that sits infront of the back four and defends (mainly because I dislike those kind of players).
Fantastic going forwards but they leak goals with Bale there.
Imagine Bale and Glen Johnson both playing at full back. That team would ship 3 goals a game.
They've never leaked goals because of Bale being there, for a start, Spurs play very openly anyway, but if Bale doesn't play there then Assou-Ekotto does who isn't any better. One of redcafe's favourite fallacies is to proclaim all attacking full backs as atrocious defensively just because they're not a converted centre back.
It's actually the other way around - most posters are far too easily seduced by full backs who play like useless wingers (or quite good wingers in Bale's case).Actually agree with that, it seems most posters here give attacking full backs a disproportionally unfair rap for their defending.
its a crying shame seeing as spurs only got him for 5 million
really good left sided players are few and far between
we will buy ashley young in the summer on the cheap (his contract situation was the same as rooneys)
They've never leaked goals because of Bale being there, for a start, Spurs play very openly anyway, but if Bale doesn't play there then Assou-Ekotto does who isn't any better. One of redcafe's favourite fallacies is to proclaim all attacking full backs as atrocious defensively just because they're not a converted centre back.
we will buy ashley young in the summer on the cheap (his contract situation was the same as rooneys)
They have. At OT against us for starters, so United fans have a decent knowledge of this actually. He really isn't very good defensively. I'm sure he could improve but he's so productive going forwards it seems like a massive waste. His fantastic form last season started when Modric was injured and he came in at LW. His form earnt him a couple starts at LB when Modric returned, but he wasn't great there, and returned to LW with Modric replacing Palacios in the centre.
You're talking about one game, he hasn't ever consistently been a weak link in their defence. His form also didn't coincide with being moved to left wing, he was fantastic at LB for a couple of months before he started playing further forward more regularly.
Kept very quiet on Saturday I thought.
Was very quiet against Everton as well.
No surprise. He evolvedhe looks like a monkey
On Saturday, Rafael owned him.
Absolute bollocks.
More to do with Fletcher's energy than anything else.
he looks like a monkey
Have your say, pal, if it makes you happy. Does not matter who owned him. HE WAS OWNED.
Because you doubled up on him.
If Spurs were more than about pretty triangles they would have made you pay elsewhere.
But they blew it.
Because you doubled up on him.
If Spurs were more than about pretty triangles they would have made you pay elsewhere.
But they blew it.
Because you doubled up on him.
If Spurs were more than about pretty triangles they would have made you pay elsewhere.
But they blew it.
Are you serious? Did you even watch the game? .
Rafael got the better of Bale in a one on one repeatedly. Fletcher barely even got involved.
Guardian chalkboard has Rafael down as winning 7 tackles* all down our right flank, inside our half. Fletcher won one tackle in that area in the whole 90 minutes.
*Equal highest amount of tackles won by any player on the pitch and almost twice as many as every other United player.
Yeah like most teams make United pay at Old Trafford, Sam. Fact is, Spurs played well but were simply up against a better side.