Smores
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2011
- Messages
- 25,804
Holy shit she went full on 1984, we're raising numbers she said proudly
No. She just rambled on about the cyber and giving more powers to officers. More power is all well and good but the policeman was asking about having more numbers and wanted her to be specific.I'm not going mad, that question was about extra police officers wasn't it? Did she mention a number at all?
I'm not going mad, that question was about extra police officers wasn't it? Did she mention a number at all?
Not really. I did expect the moderator to call her out on it at least. Instead he couldn't move on quick enough.No.
were you seriously expecting her to?
Corbyn wouldn't on immigration tbf- spouting arbitrary numbers is pretty pointless in all honesty.No.
were you seriously expecting her to?
Corbyn wouldn't on immigration tbf- spouting arbitrary numbers is pretty pointless in all honesty.
She is a bit more poised than I expected, agreed. Let's see how Paxman goes, as per our earlier convo!I think she's doing better than expected, as well.
You can aspire to aim X number within however many years- achieving that is something else.Corbyn was correct though.
But you absolutely can control the number of policemen you can hire.
She is a bit more poised than I expected, agreed. Let's see how Paxman goes, as per our earlier convo!
You can aspire to aim X number within however many years- achieving that is something else.
If you pay attention you'll notice that she doesn't ever actually answer anything. Vague answers about aspirations that never hit on particularities.All her answers seem to be "find out after you elect me"
She's stumbling through this but it's not a disaster. Of course, being allowed not to answer the question helps.
Audience laughing at her, that's a good sign...