General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time

How do you intend to vote in the 2017 General Election if eligible?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 80 14.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 322 58.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 57 10.3%
  • Green

    Votes: 20 3.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 13 2.4%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 29 5.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 14 2.5%

  • Total voters
    551
  • Poll closed .
That poll basically has the tories and Labour neck and neck going in to the polls? Are they less reliable than yougov or more or about the same?
 
So that is a 0.2% drop for the Tories in comparison to their last one and no change for Labour, if I'm remembering right.

And that can mean only one thing.


LIB DEM SURGE!!!!1!
 
That poll basically has the tories and Labour neck and neck going in to the polls? Are they less reliable than yougov or more or about the same?

No one knows who's reliable anymore. From what I know Survation got it close in 2015 but the likes of ICM who have double figure leads etc are generally thought of as alright too. Guess we'll find out tomorrow.
 
If Corb did manage to form a government on Friday (or at least have enough seats to make it feasible), he'd have done it without leading in a single poll for a year.
 
Express up to their old tricks again

'WE WILL RIOT' Corbyn supporters threaten violence if Labour don't win election


In chilling social media posts seen by Express.co.uk, the hard-left activists warned of mass social unrest in the event of a Tory victory.

They raised the possibility of riots, protests and strikes – and even a revolution – if Theresa May remains Prime Minister.
 
Labour's pollster



Possibly explains the "sources from Labour HQ expect defeat" stories.
 
Holy hell!!!



Has to be done!

5kfz7kn.gif
 
No one knows who's reliable anymore. From what I know Survation got it close in 2015 but the likes of ICM who have double figure leads etc are generally thought of as alright too. Guess we'll find out tomorrow.
in a stoned haze about 3 weeks ago i must have got swept up in corbynmania and somehow managed to put £62.50 on corbyn to be prime minister after the election. feck knows what came over me, but as i top up my wages with gambling that money is basically business money to me (that's how i look at it) and there is abviously a good chance that i have pissed it away, of course it was on paddy power so i don't even have a cash out option. So, that explains why i am more nervous than most about the results.
 
What are these numbers that YouGov etc produce? I'm sorry I'm shite, I've seen them before just forgotten.
 
I reckon 10 point Tory win. Corbyn to resign.
 
Heard this morning that the reason for the spread is due to pollsters using different turnout values for the young. Sound accurate?

Yes, somebody from ICM was explaining this on the TV yesterday.

YouGov tend to include youth turnout in their predictions, whereas ICM tend to believe that younger people won't turn out as much. Youth turnout has been low in UK general elections for the last 40 years. If the other elections are anything to go by, the Tories should be home and dry. If however, the youngsters really do turn and vote for Corbyn as they've said they will, it could be a bit closer.
 
Yes, somebody from ICM was explaining this on the TV yesterday.

YouGov tend to include youth turnout in their predictions, whereas ICM tend to believe that younger people won't turn out as much. Youth turnout has been low in UK general elections for the last 40 years. If the other elections are anything to go by, the Tories should be home and dry. If however, the youngsters really do turn and vote for Corbyn as they've said they will, it could be a bit closer.
I really think that they will. more than that, i believe they will turn out in greater number than the overestimates.
 
Some research company called Qriously has Labour winning by 3 points :lol:
I see this has been brought to our attention because Nate Silver's making the mistake of talking about UK elections again...
 
London-based Qriously is an ad-tech startup with an extensive list of clients including Vodafone, Audi, B&Q and organisations like the New York Police Department. Qriously conducts surveys by sending short questionnaires via mobile phone to billions of users in a matter of seconds. Using their platform, they have been able to correctly predict the outcome of the Brexit referendum, the Italian constitutional referendum, the Dutch general election and the Turkish constitutional referendum. According to Kahler, they can theoretically reach 80 per cent of smartphone users worldwide.

o-CORBYN-TWEETS-570.jpg
 
Just doing some research in their previous polling and i have to admit it looks encouraging.
 
I checked their EU referendum numbers, they had Leave winning by 12. So the best you can say for that is that they were the same wrongness as most others but in the opposite direction.
 
Some silly United forum has a Labour majority with the Tory's getting less than 15% of the vote.

Could happen.
ANNOWNNCE CORBUN
 
Will be interesting to see if the anti-monarchy Corbyn changes the national anthem once he's in. I think this tune stands a good chance:

 
I was more interested in this.

"In 2014, Qriously won Advertising Age's award for the "worst name in ad-tech", after voting in a poll, where it beat Vungle, Nanigans, AdsWizz, and Burt."
 
Will be interesting to see if the anti-monarchy Corbyn changes the national anthem once he's in. I think this tune stands a good chance:


I honestly don't know where i stand on the monarchy, i don't see the royal family as a particularly bad thing, but i don't see them as particularly useful either.
 
I honestly don't know where i stand on the monarchy, i don't see the royal family as a particularly bad thing, but i don't see them as particularly useful either.

I'm anti-monarchy in principle but it's not something I particularly care about right now. For the most part the current lot are okay, and they're basically glorified celebrities who do lots of public engagements.