Very frustrating. Am trying to be balanced, given the season he had, but hell he had a shocker of a tournament.That was so bad..
That, so few England players come out of the Euros with their reputation intact, let alone enhanced.
Very frustrating. Am trying to be balanced, given the season he had, but hell he had a shocker of a tournament.That was so bad..
Total crap. If you seriously imagine that playing against Iceland is more pressure than playing in a North London derby against Arsenal then you are off your trolley.
I said from the start that trying to shoe-horn Rooney into the side was the fundamental mistake - and god was he crap tonight. Kane plays best in a 4-2-3-1 formation, but no, Hodgson insists on (a) playing him in 4 -3-3 (or else some bollocks 'diamond' formation), probably because he's heard it's 'fashionable'; and (b) shoe-horning in Rooney, because he's a 'big player'.
Rooney's inclusion fecks it up for both Kane and Alli, who gets shunted to the left hand side of a 3-man midfield, when he should have been playing centrally behing Kane.
The basic team should always have involved Dier and Wilshere as a two behind Alli, with Kane up front by himself, and two others playing either side of Alli as an attacking three.
The simple stupid analogy I used in my previous post, can be used to explain the miscontrol touch too. At Totenham Kane knows his teammate movement, support run, so by habit, Kane would know what touch, control he needs to use to keep the play going. Here England does not even know their best team/play, so when receiving the ball, instead of making use of memory muscle, habit straight forward thought, Kane has to think too much with this ever tactic changing England. As the more games go, the more pressure, self doubt is increasing, leads to bad touches, out of form.That is exactly my initial point. Kane showed his mental limits at the Euro. Some things can be explained by tactics and others not.
What chances were those then? The whole team didn't create any clear cut chances in the whole 90 minutes. You're talking nonsense.What's unfair about it? He was the man chosen to lead the line and he was one of the worst players in the tournament, missing plenty of chances in the process. It seems entirely fair to pin a large portion of blame on him.
Exactly. So why does that make him "shocking" rather than his team mates that didn't provide any service?He's been shocking at this championship. He's had hardly any touches in the penalty areas....that's bad for a main striker.
Yes, along with his 25 goals as well. Thanks for your generosity.£100m striker
I wouldn't want us paying 10m, Spurs can have him.
You mean like the rest of the team?This tournament has really exposed his lack of ability. People were talking him up as if he was some sort of Sheringham/Shearer hybrid when in fact he's just a trigger happy poacher. Forgot the shit free kicks he could barely control the ball or complete straightforward passes.
The simple stupid analogy I used in my previous post, can be used to explain the miscontrol touch too. At Totenham Kane knows his teammate movement, support run, so by habit, Kane would know what touch, control he needs to use to keep the play going.
What makes him shocking in this tournament was the shit work rate, not opening himself up or busting a gut to get in a good position, not running the channels like all lone strikers have to, and then when he did get the ball, thinking he was Ronaldo and shooting from wherever he was on the pitch even though he has no hope of scoring. Feck knows why he seemed to think he could do it on his own, but he was absolutely awful and without a doubt the worst of the lot throughout the tournament IMO. Also what the feck was up with him taking the set pieces? Can't cross worth shit yet keeps on taking them and doesn't let anyone else take free kicks or corners. You will struggle to see a worse performance over the 3 or 4 games he played at this tournament then his and how useless he was.Exactly. So why does that make him "shocking" rather than his team mates that didn't provide any service?
Total crap. If you seriously imagine that playing against Iceland is more pressure than playing in a North London derby against Arsenal then you are off your trolley.
I said from the start that trying to shoe-horn Rooney into the side was the fundamental mistake - and god was he crap tonight. Kane plays best in a 4-2-3-1 formation, but no, Hodgson insists on (a) playing him in 4 -3-3 (or else some bollocks 'diamond' formation), probably because he's heard it's 'fashionable'; and (b) shoe-horning in Rooney, because he's a 'big player'.
Rooney's inclusion fecks it up for both Kane and Alli, who gets shunted to the left hand side of a 3-man midfield, when he should have been playing centrally behing Kane.
The basic team should always have involved Dier and Wilshere as a two behind Alli, with Kane up front by himself, and two others playing either side of Alli as an attacking three.
Never fill the team with Spurs players, they feck it up like they always do. Kyle Walker, Danny Rose, Delle Alli, Dyer and Harry Kane all had absolute howlers. The rest of them weren't any good either.
Never fill the team with Spurs players, they feck it up like they always do. Kyle Walker, Danny Rose, Delle Alli, Dyer and Harry Kane all had absolute howlers. The rest of them weren't any good either.
Well then that's not Kane's fault, it's the manager's fault isn't it?I think the thing with Kane is that unless you make your system suit him, Then he is very unadaptable and pretty feckless. It was obvious after the first game against Russia that England weren't set out to play to his strengths, Therefore he shouldn't of started anymore games.
Well then that's not Kane's fault, it's the manager's fault isn't it?
Total crap. If you seriously imagine that playing against Iceland is more pressure than playing in a North London derby against Arsenal then you are off your trolley.
I said from the start that trying to shoe-horn Rooney into the side was the fundamental mistake - and god was he crap tonight. Kane plays best in a 4-2-3-1 formation, but no, Hodgson insists on (a) playing him in 4 -3-3 (or else some bollocks 'diamond' formation), probably because he's heard it's 'fashionable'; and (b) shoe-horning in Rooney, because he's a 'big player'.
Rooney's inclusion fecks it up for both Kane and Alli, who gets shunted to the left hand side of a 3-man midfield, when he should have been playing centrally behing Kane.
The basic team should always have involved Dier and Wilshere as a two behind Alli, with Kane up front by himself, and two others playing either side of Alli as an attacking three.
Well then that's not Kane's fault, it's the manager's fault isn't it?
Well then that's not Kane's fault, it's the manager's fault isn't it?
No, not trying to defend him, just trying to bring some perspective. Why is Kane being singled out when the whole team were crap? Every single one of them were crap. Shearer summed it up very well in MOTD.I don't quite understand people's affinity to "shift blame or try and defend" a player from the clubs they support, like the Spurs fans seem to be trying to do in this thread.
Is it really that difficult to just say someone had a stinker/shit tournament? Yeah, there'll be some bashings going OTT, but it comes with the territory. But it should be easy to call shit, well....shit, no matter who they play for.
Just look at the Rooney thread on this United forum. You'll find 80-90% calling him shit and a minority trying to defend his performances.
The manager selects the team doesn't he? So if he selects a bunch of players that don't fit together well and play to each other's strengths, that's not the manager's fault? Ok, gottcha.No it's not, but it is what it is. You'd like to think a player of Kane' records in the PL could do a lot more than absolutely feck all if a team doesn't play to his strengths though. By the looks of things he's a very very limited player.