Harry Kane | Bayern Munich player

jm99 said:
I can't see it. If he doesn't move this summer he's only 30, can likely get a big signing on fee, and will have his choice of us, Madrid or Munich.
Click to expand...

He's going to stay in England for at least the next 3 to 4 seasons in order to break Shearer's all time PL goal record.

He'll get paid more, challenge for trophies, and assuming he's fit, he'll surpass Shearer.

Plus he doesn't have to be official club captain. Can just play his game and let others like Bruno, Casemiro, and Marcus get the spotlight.

All time goal scorer for boyhood club, England Men, and Premier League...that's nice. All while staying along for a medal or two...
 
2 man midfield said:
This really needs Kane to kick up the mother of all shitstorms if it’s ever getting off the ground.
Click to expand...

The problem is he kicked up a fuss to an extent when wanting to join City,however when it came to the crunch he wouldn't go through with it. Mind you I really don't know what he could do that could make Levy give in and grant him this move.
 
Last edited:
kaku06 said:
This cnut Levy. People say he’s a businessman so he won’t take a risk losing a £100m asset for free but he’s a cnut before a businessman. He would happily welcome a violent diarrhoea every day for the whole season than selling Kane to us this summer.
Click to expand...
kaku06 said:
Indeed. The bald cnut hates us with passion for some god damn reason. Would do anything to satisfy his own ego. He’s hasn’t learned his lesson after losing Eriksen, Dele Alli etc for peanuts and making bad decision after bad decision for Spurs.
Click to expand...
Imo this mf just wants more. This will drag for a while but imo he'll sell eventually. It's his last chance to cash in and as you said he should have learned his lesson with Eriksen and Alli. And there's basically no chance Spurs would qualify for CL next season Kane or no Kane.

This imo is actually not a bad thing for us. As long as the takeover doesn't get done yet we don't have the money for Kane I think. Considering we reportedly would keep MG and the current market I don't think we really should spend big on Hojlund now but should wait a bit for Kane. Imo Hojlund is still quite raw and the price being quoted is simply crazy.
 
The desperation of the media to get Kane out of Spurs is annoying. England No 9 is bad business for Manchester United.

Tottenham is good for him and England, coming to United now won’t make him a better player. It will just be another unnecessary media circus ETH will have to deal with.

If we sign Harry Kane now, we should forget the idea of bringing in an understudy because it will be a waste of money and time. That player will never be allowed the time and opportunity by the media for the next 4 years to develop. Everything he’ll do will be picked apart bordering unsettling, we will end up with another Rooney situation of United fans wanting him dropped but the media backing him because they want him to rediscover his youth for the good of England.

Our manager is not established himself yet in the English game to involve himself in their drama. Let Tottenham house him, they’re usually the residence of the England no 9 anyway.

Brilliant striker but Id rather not have him at United.
 
KikiDaKats said:
The desperation of the media to get Kane out of Spurs is annoying. England No 9 is bad business for Manchester United.

Tottenham is good for him and England, coming to United now won’t make him a better player. It will just be another unnecessary media circus ETH will have to deal with.

If we sign Harry Kane now, we should forget the idea of bringing in an understudy because it will be a waste of money and time. That player will never be allowed the time and opportunity by the media for the next 4 years to develop. Everything he’ll do will be picked apart bordering unsettling, we will end up with another Rooney situation of United fans wanting him dropped but the media backing him because they want him to rediscover his youth for the good of England.

Our manager is not established himself yet in the English game to involve himself in their drama. Let Tottenham house him, they’re usually the residence of the England no 9 anyway.

Brilliant striker but Id rather not have him at United.
Click to expand...

What!?

What the feck is this nonsense!?
 
KikiDaKats said:
The desperation of the media to get Kane out of Spurs is annoying. England No 9 is bad business for Manchester United.

Tottenham is good for him and England, coming to United now won’t make him a better player. It will just be another unnecessary media circus ETH will have to deal with.

If we sign Harry Kane now, we should forget the idea of bringing in an understudy because it will be a waste of money and time. That player will never be allowed the time and opportunity by the media for the next 4 years to develop. Everything he’ll do will be picked apart bordering unsettling, we will end up with another Rooney situation of United fans wanting him dropped but the media backing him because they want him to rediscover his youth for the good of England.

Our manager is not established himself yet in the English game to involve himself in their drama. Let Tottenham house him, they’re usually the residence of the England no 9 anyway.

Brilliant striker but Id rather not have him at United.
Click to expand...
ETH handled Ronaldo just fine Kane won't be an issue I think.

And why not an understudy? Last season we played an insane amount of matches this season would be pretty the same imo. Kane will be 30 next season he shouldn't play every matches I think. Let alone the next 4 years.
 
Strelok said:
ETH handled Ronaldo just fine Kane won't be an issue I think.

And why not an understudy? Last season we played an insane amount of matches this season would be pretty the same imo. Kane will be 30 next season he shouldn't play every matches I think. Let alone the next 4 years.
Click to expand...
Reference points
What the team became after Ronaldo left compared to when he was around. He handled him alright but he didn’t sign Ronaldo.
No reason why he should not but it doesn’t really work like that does it? Harry Maguire, Sancho or even Rashford and Shaw to a lesser extent. Martinez not good enough, Antony waste of money, Martial inconsistent and Telles/Malacia can’t defend.Have you not seen the pattern?
Im not blaming the media for looking out for the NT because it’s the right thing to do. Just don’t want too much of that drama in our own backyard. Have you ever wondered why all these years no understudy at Spurs has done good things or during the days of Shearer he had no understudy at Newcastle? There is a reason why most top clubs avoid the politics of having the countries No 9 as their striker.
 
KikiDaKats said:
Reference points
What the team became after Ronaldo left compared to when he was around. He handled him alright but he didn’t sign Ronaldo.
No reason why he should not but it doesn’t really work like that does it? Harry Maguire, Sancho or even Rashford and Shaw to a lesser extent. Martinez not good enough, Antony waste of money, Martial inconsistent and Telles/Malacia can’t defend.Have you not seen the pattern?
Im not blaming the media for looking out for the NT because it’s the right thing to do. Just don’t want too much of that drama in our own backyard. Have you ever wondered why all these years no understudy at Spurs has done good things or during the days of Shearer he had no understudy at Newcastle? There is a reason why most top clubs avoid the politics of having the countries No 9 as their striker.
Click to expand...
If not Kane which world class proven top scorer you think we should sign without the media making some noise about?

For the understudy stuff Kane is 30 now it's just very different with his previous time at Spurs. Plus imo it's not really a reason we should say no to a world class player. And it's not like we already have any understudy for that position anyway. Or probably even the money for that. Which team in the world could be stupid enough to say no to a world class player because of some young player they don't even know who that might be let alone sign him? That sounds just too stupid tbh.

Anyway I don't think this discussion would go anywhere so we'd better agree to disagree I think.
 
Chief123 said:
Which boys did you invite to this massage?
Click to expand...

I think you take the word "boy" too seriously, tried to rejuvenate you a little, but apparently this isn't to your taste. This is considered a compliment from where i am but from where you are it seems that people don't take it that way or perhaps at least you.

Aceept yourself as you like for example old man, man, adult, grown-up, full-grown, mature or fully fledged . I'm sorry that I hurt you with the word "boy" or you got affected by it , I'll keep in mind not to use that word so often in the future, especially towards you, Major.
 
KikiDaKats said:
The desperation of the media to get Kane out of Spurs is annoying. England No 9 is bad business for Manchester United.

Tottenham is good for him and England, coming to United now won’t make him a better player. It will just be another unnecessary media circus ETH will have to deal with.

If we sign Harry Kane now, we should forget the idea of bringing in an understudy because it will be a waste of money and time. That player will never be allowed the time and opportunity by the media for the next 4 years to develop. Everything he’ll do will be picked apart bordering unsettling, we will end up with another Rooney situation of United fans wanting him dropped but the media backing him because they want him to rediscover his youth for the good of England.

Our manager is not established himself yet in the English game to involve himself in their drama. Let Tottenham house him, they’re usually the residence of the England no 9 anyway.

Brilliant striker but Id rather not have him at United.
Click to expand...
Nothing like imagining a situation in your own head and telling a tale of horror of doom and gloom for both Kane and Manchester United to justify why we should stay away from one of the elite strikers who is a sure shot thing to succeed here. Very convincing indeed. I am so in and Kane is actually Rabies.
 
Strelok said:
Imo this mf just wants more. This will drag for a while but imo he'll sell eventually. It's his last chance to cash in and as you said he should have learned his lesson with Eriksen and Alli. And there's basically no chance Spurs would qualify for CL next season Kane or no Kane.
Click to expand...
I hope you are right mate. But I wouldn’t bet against that bald prick. His ego and hatred for us transcends everything.
 
CantonaManc said:
I think you take the word "boy" too seriously, tried to rejuvenate you a little, but apparently this isn't to your taste. This is considered a compliment from where i am but from where you are it seems that people don't take it that way or perhaps at least you.

Aceept yourself as you like for example old man, man, adult, grown-up, full-grown, mature or fully fledged . I'm sorry that I hurt you with the word "boy" or you got affected by it , I'll keep in mind not to use that word so often in the future, especially towards you, Major.
Click to expand...
er, I think he was referring to the fact you wrote the word 'massage' instead of 'message' in your original post. :wenger:
 
KikiDaKats said:
What makes it nonsensical?
Click to expand...

I can see the point you are making here but maybe if Harry Kane was 34 you would have a point, but he is still in his prime, an ultimate professional and someone who doesn't create any trouble.

He would score goals for fun at United and I really don't think there would be any type of circus.

Anyone United sign gets criticism from the press

Casemiro = too old
Antony = waste of money
Eriksen = past it


Grealish = just needs time to settle
Kelvin Phillips = just needs time to settle


The press will always try and create drama at United, as that what sells.
 
croadyman said:
The problem is he kicked up a fuss to an extent when wanting to join City,however when it came to the crunch he wouldn't go through with it. Mind you I really don't know what he could do that could make Levy give in and grant him this move.
Click to expand...

I don't know that this is the same situation as the city move. Back then if he threatened to down tools, a stubborn levy could have kept him for 3 years and not played him and totally fecked his career, now he can leave on a free next summer, he certainly has a bit more leverage to force the move his time around
 
KikiDaKats said:
The desperation of the media to get Kane out of Spurs is annoying. England No 9 is bad business for Manchester United.

Tottenham is good for him and England, coming to United now won’t make him a better player. It will just be another unnecessary media circus ETH will have to deal with.

If we sign Harry Kane now, we should forget the idea of bringing in an understudy because it will be a waste of money and time. That player will never be allowed the time and opportunity by the media for the next 4 years to develop. Everything he’ll do will be picked apart bordering unsettling, we will end up with another Rooney situation of United fans wanting him dropped but the media backing him because they want him to rediscover his youth for the good of England.

Our manager is not established himself yet in the English game to involve himself in their drama. Let Tottenham house him, they’re usually the residence of the England no 9 anyway.

Brilliant striker but Id rather not have him at United.
Click to expand...

This literally makes no sense whatsoever.

And it's got some insane copy-pasta potential.
 
RaddyRed said:
I can see the point you are making here but maybe if Harry Kane was 34 you would have a point, but he is still in his prime, an ultimate professional and someone who doesn't create any trouble.

He would score goals for fun at United and I really don't think there would be any type of circus.

Anyone United sign gets criticism from the press

Casemiro = too old
Antony = waste of money
Eriksen = past it


Grealish = just needs time to settle
Kelvin Phillips = just needs time to settle


The press will always try and create drama at United, as that what sells.
Click to expand...
I have never heard of him a troublemaker. In fact he is highly respected by his peers for his professionalism. Not even saying he himself will be disruptive at all.

I also think Kane is in his prime and I see him giving us at least a perfect 3 seasons because he is capable and I’ll be a fool to ignore that. Whatever the fee is its true valuation of his ability. Not disputing any of that.

The things I have an issue with, we’ve all seen played out in front of us time and time again. Yet we are expected to sweep it under the carpet.
 
Harry's brother-agent wants us to do the dirty work for him but Harry needs to grow a pair and force the move.

Now he's trying again to ramp up the interest for Harry.
 
Im of the opinion that a bad start for Spurs could see us signing Kane in January for 60-70m.
Be silly to bid much more
 
cyberman said:
Im of the opinion that a bad start for Spurs could see us signing Kane in January for 60-70m.
Be silly to bid much more
Click to expand...
Selling Kane after a bad start would only see them plummet further down the league. 0 chance they sell him in Jan.
 
KikiDaKats said:
I have never heard of him a troublemaker. In fact he is highly respected by his peers for his professionalism. Not even saying he himself will be disruptive at all.

I also think Kane is in his prime and I see him giving us at least a perfect 3 seasons because he is capable and I’ll be a fool to ignore that. Whatever the fee is its true valuation of his ability. Not disputing any of that.

The things I have an issue with, we’ve all seen played out in front of us time and time again. Yet we are expected to sweep it under the carpet.
Click to expand...

So he's highly respected, not a troublemaker, would give us a perfect 3 seasons but would also be really bad business? Help me out with this one
 
kaku06 said:
I hope you are right mate. But I wouldn’t bet against that bald prick. His ego and hatred for us transcends everything.
Click to expand...
Agree that cnut Levy really hate us. But imo he didn't make his current fortune by making decisions based on sentiments. That cnut is simply a businessman. And they're all about money.

Imo the problem with Levy is he's just too greedy with his evaluation for Eriksen, Alli etc. and especially Kane. And his project to make Spurs to become a top club, which was almost succesful when they reached the CL final. But clearly has failed miserably now. Tbh I couldn't find any logical reason for that cnut to not sell Kane this summer. We all know Spurs won't make top 4 next season Kane or no Kane.
 
UpWithRivers said:
Selling Kane after a bad start would only see them plummet further down the league. 0 chance they sell him in Jan.
Click to expand...
But keeping Kane wouldnt matter as much then. There would be no sense in keeping him at that stage, it would be pure stubbornness
 
Wait Levy out, take his prized asset for free next summer and still get 2-3 seasons out of him.
 
Lash said:
It's just highly speculative. It's not untrue, of course we'd be interested at £80m, but that's not happening.
Click to expand...
Yeah I get you would be interested but all the rubbish about what Kane wants and is thinking - all of that is pure speculation.
 
balaks said:
Yeah I get you would be interested but all the rubbish about what Kane wants and is thinking - all of that is pure speculation.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I mean I've said it in this thread before, there's a lot of talking from a fan wanting to buy him perspective, rather than looking at the reality of the situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.