AfonsoAlves
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2023
- Messages
- 832
High number of civilian casualties and relatively few strategic targets. But war crimes were only done by the Axis Forces.
Did you choose to ignore my first post?
High number of civilian casualties and relatively few strategic targets. But war crimes were only done by the Axis Forces.
The one which acknowledges that Dresden was a legitimate target, but its methodology of execution was unnecessarily brutal? Think I’d have phrased it differently.Did you choose to ignore my first post?
The one which acknowledges that Dresden was a legitimate target, but its methodology of execution was unnecessarily brutal? Think I’d have phrased it differently.
What? Care to elaborate? Were there war crimes committed by the Allies in WWII?The one which explains why it wasn’t a war crime.
your comment of “only axis charged with war crimes” seems like a weird “both sides”fallacy
What? Care to elaborate? Were there war crimes committed by the Allies in WWII?
“Conquistadores” by Fernando Cervantes covers the story from Columbus through to Pizarro. The author is a little bit generous to the Spanish in his judgments but he does a good job of framing the story in the context of the worldview of the Europe of the late 15th/early 16th century.Can anyone recommend a serious but accessible book on the Spanish conquest of Mexico and Central America?
“Conquistadores” by Fernando Cervantes covers the story from Columbus through to Pizarro. The author is a little bit generous to the Spanish in his judgments but he does a good job of framing the story in the context of the worldview of the Europe of the late 15th/early 16th century.
Dresden was a war crime. Even the BBC reported it as such a few years ago on the anniversary.The one which explains why it wasn’t a war crime.
Dresden was a war crime. Even the BBC reported it as such a few years ago on the anniversary.