Is it fair to worship Guardiola at this point? | The Ball Did It

What's your take on Guardiola?


  • Total voters
    673
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's the thing, it's never just one factor but a series of them. Even now, they are without Mendy who they brought in to provide what you (Along with platooning Danilo) but look what they are using at LB, Delph.
dude, Delph started his career as a left back. The role really isn't foreign to him and that is why I was amazed last season Pep had ostracized him.

Even during his time at Barcelona, there would be suspensions, injuries etc. whereby he had to move pieces around to ensure they could push in attack - they just suffered fewer issues in terms of being clinical
I don't remember any point in Pep's stay at Barcelona that he ever got depleted in fullback areas. At Bayern when he lost his wingers and Alaba to injury it cost him dear in Europe vs Barca.

As for finishing, it's a confidence thing. Now that City are plundering goals last like a boxer plundering wins vs weaker opponents, their finishing will remain good.
 
dude, Delph started his career as a left back. The role really isn't foreign to him and that is why I was amazed last season Pep had ostracized him.

I don't remember any point in Pep's stay at Barcelona that he ever got depleted in fullback areas. At Bayern when he lost his wingers and Alaba to injury it cost him dear in Europe vs Barca.

As for finishing, it's a confidence thing. Now that City are plundering goals last like a boxer plundering wins vs weaker opponents, their finishing will remain good.

He may have played at LB at times but even the player himself says he is a midfielder, not a LB, but happy to help the team

Sylvinho started the CL match against United at LB and Puyol at RB when Abidal & Alves were both suspended. He also played both Keita & Yaya in central defense. I don't know many coaches that move pieces around like that
 
He may have played at LB at times but even the player himself says he is a midfielder, not a LB, but happy to help the team

Sylvinho started the CL match against United at LB and Puyol at RB when Abidal & Alves were both suspended. He also played both Keita & Yaya in central defense. I don't know many coaches that move pieces around like that
Dude Puyol started his career as a right back and was a world class defender. Sylvnho left Arsenal for Barca as one of the top lb's in England. Only leaving Arsenal due to the emergence of Ashley Cole. That does not count as depletion.
 
Dude Puyol started his career as a right back and was a world class defender. Sylvnho left Arsenal for Barca as one of the top lb's in England. Only leaving Arsenal due to the emergence of Ashley Cole. That does not count as depletion.

Puyol also played striker in his career, not sure how that means he'd have been depth at forward as result. The point wasn't that Sylvinho wasn't an LB but that Barcelona under Pep had FB depth issues, going from Abidal or Alves to Sylvinho & Puyol in a CL Final is a big adjustment
 
He may have played at LB at times but even the player himself says he is a midfielder, not a LB, but happy to help the team

Sylvinho started the CL match against United at LB and Puyol at RB when Abidal & Alves were both suspended. He also played both Keita & Yaya in central defense. I don't know many coaches that move pieces around like that
Every coach who has to deal with injuries/suspensions does that. So, every coach, really. Some are less flexible than others but all are forced sometimes.

John O'Shea played in all positions during his United career. I'm not even joking.
 
I agree with all you say, I've said for what he is, a manager that needs exactly the right environment and resources to succeed, he is unrivalled. But to me that doesn't in turn mean he is the best manager. I'm not going to compare him to Poch, simply because I have no argument there in terms of a return in silverware, but I will say I respect Poch much more in the way he carries himself and his own ideas on the sport. Il also say I personally believe Jose is the better manager, proving himself in a much broader spectrum of football. Again I will say Pep is a good manager, but he is what he is, he spends for success and needs a certain perfect environment for his team to succeed.

What I mean about his failure to acknowledge his situation is that he pays very little regard for his opponent, it's like when bigger teams chant "your shit" at an apponent that is significantly less well resourced than they are.

Also the whole idea that Pep created this hard press and demanding a high work rate is a bit hard to swallow. I remember playing a very low level of school football where our coach demanded we got in the "opponents faces" and "left it all on the pitch", it's not new it's just Pep has refined it.

You say last season was ok because Pep was new last season, he still had arguably the best team on paper but completely disregarded the strength on the PL and thought he could coast it. I have no problem with fans who think he the best but I simply don't agree, there is a reason he has moved a lot and that's simply his style of play and the way he uses his players won't work in the long term, players wil ultimately stop pushing so hard, he is not a patch on Fergison no matter what he wins. It's just my view but a managers spending, or indeed overspending, must reflect and be taken into consideration when assessing their ability.

Lastly I think people writing this season off and just giving it up to City is very premature, they probably will ultimately win but at some point they will go through a sticky patch and anything can happen.

And I get your point however "the best" is very subjective and will vary from individual to individual. You say, "I respect Poch much more in the way he carries himself and his own ideas on the sport." doesn't Pep do that too? Sure you can say Mou or Poch have done well and in case of Mou have won titles with not the best of environments, but that doesn't make them better lol

"What I mean about his failure to acknowledge his situation is that he pays very little regard for his opponent"

What? If anything Pep is obsessed with every detail of the game regardless of oppositions. He fielded a lot of first team players in both his Cup games this season. Mendy recently spoke about how he kept talking about the Stoke game to them and was drilling their head in, doesn't seem like a guy who pays little regards to his opponents, especially since that's the main reason he doesn't stay around because it can get tiring for him and the players.

Also the whole idea that Pep created this hard press and demanding a high work rate is a bit hard to swallow


And I never said he created it. I said he was renowned for it meaning known for setting up is team with these fundamentals. You said, "a great manager should be judged on more than that" and I responded by saying he's known for his style of play, which is why many clubs hire him also. Of course he didn't create it. He even said himself he got his pressing from Bielsa Bilbao who would press the hell out of their oppositions.

You say last season was ok because Pep was new last season, he still had arguably the best team on paper but completely disregarded the strength on the PL and thought he could coast it.

Yes, he did have one of the best teams no doubt about it, but it wasn't the best that's people pushing an agenda. KdB himself said that when he joined there was too many old players on the team and this season the team is more fresh with younger blood. Did he tell you this? Last season even when they were unbeaten he said, the team was a long way off to what he wants to they would hit a rough patch. He said after the CL qualifying games he knew it would be a long season as it wasn't just the defense, but the offense also.

I have no problem with fans who think he the best but I simply don't agree, there is a reason he has moved a lot and that's simply his style of play and the way he uses his players won't work in the long term, players wil ultimately stop pushing so hard, he is not a patch on Fergison no matter what he wins. It's just my view but a managers spending, or indeed overspending, must reflect and be taken into consideration when assessing their ability.

That's not entirely correct. It's true he moves on when he feels the team isn't responding to him, but that doesn't mean that should be put as a negative light on him. I don't understand this patch on Ferguson your claiming, is it because he was long time manager at United? I mean by that logic I could say Fergie wouldn't have last at RM or Barcelona, he wouldn't have been able to control all those egos and deal with the politics there and he would've been sacked eventually.

Of course spending or overspending should be, but you yourself said there probably isn't anyone better then Pep with resource if given, so doesn't that say something?

I never said City are going to win it and I do believe it's premature, the league is still 27 games with CL, FA Cup and Carabao Cup mixed in. Anything can happen.
 
Puyol also played striker in his career, not sure how that means he'd have been depth at forward as result. The point wasn't that Sylvinho wasn't an LB but that Barcelona under Pep had FB depth issues, going from Abidal or Alves to Sylvinho & Puyol in a CL Final is a big adjustment
Stop mixing issues. When he made his senior debut for Barca, under LVG, Puyol was a right back and a bloody fine one too. He just got switched centrally due to his leadership quality, man marking and the powers that be at the club preferred flair in full back positions. So he was not even close to out of position in the role. And insist Sylvinho playing in the final was never remotely a sign of depletion in fullback areas. Its not like he was a fourth choice option. He was Abidal's direct cover. Barca instead got depleted in defence that a kid called Busquets was drafted into midfield and Yaya Toure played CB. But in fullback areas, Pep never faced a huge problem. Else his system would have suffered
 
Last edited:
Even when fit last season he was never in the squad. Yet guys like Fernando would make the team. Even as fullbacks.

without getting into a yes no, it as only the last 7 games he didn't make the squad when not injured, no idea why that was but doesn't seem like there was anything untoward in it. Wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't 100% fit which has been his problem for us more or less since he came to the club

https://www.transfermarkt.com/fabia...r/50362/saison/2016/wettbewerb/GB1/verein/281
 
Saw an interesting graphic on soccer reddit. It is pretty crazy how similar all of Guardiolas teams are based on these couple metrics.

DQgrs3lX0AAcpyj.png:large
 
The pep's a** kissing begins one again. I dread this. Everytime this guy does something good he is proclaimed as the greatest just like when he falls is proclaimed as a fraud. He is neither the greatest nor a fraud.
 
The guy is still 46. It’s just ridiculous. People can moan all they want about the money spent but at the end of the day you can’t buy that kind of coaching and that style of football.

He’ll leave City in a couple of years and manage PSG and then Napoli, then end his career with 5 or so years of managing Brazil. Then he’ll either go back to Barca and pull a Fergie, or manage clubs in other continents or retire.
 
He is obviously a very good coach but I edge more towards chequebook manager than the tactical genius many like to make him out to be. He showed last season and with his inability to win the Champions League with Bayern that he needs a lot of help financially to win trophies.
 
Guardiola is a phenomenal manager. He's done his way at Barca, Bayern and now Munich. However, I think this City side would be nothin without De Bruyne and Silva. They pull all the strings. If they get injured or suspended for whatever reason, I think City wouldn't be half as good. I think they'd struggle both away from home and at home.
 
The pep's a** kissing begins one again. I dread this. Everytime this guy does something good he is proclaimed as the greatest just like when he falls is proclaimed as a fraud. He is neither the greatest nor a fraud.
I don't get where this repeated claim comes from? Every thread I read here Pep is hammered by 8 out of 10 people, as soon as anybody stands up for another view this post like yours pops up.

He's a top manager, like Jose. But pretty much every neutral would want to watch his team or have him as their manager because he combines trophies with a very good playing style.
 
The guy is still 46. It’s just ridiculous. People can moan all they want about the money spent but at the end of the day you can’t buy that kind of coaching and that style of football.

He’ll leave City in a couple of years and manage PSG and then Napoli, then end his career with 5 or so years of managing Brazil. Then he’ll either go back to Barca, manage clubs in other continents or retire.

Well if that is the case I'm curious to see what he does with Napoli, because that will be his first real challenge as a manager. My guess? He probably won't win Serie A.
 
The guy is still 46. It’s just ridiculous. People can moan all they want about the money spent but at the end of the day you can’t buy that kind of coaching and that style of football.

He’ll leave City in a couple of years and manage PSG and then Napoli, then end his career with 5 or so years of managing Brazil. Then he’ll either go back to Barca, manage clubs in other continents or retire.
Never going to happen.

The Brazilians would much rather hire a tired dud like Dunga or Scolari than look outside. One of the few national teams that stick to a countryman for the top job.
 
They didnt do anything brilliant today the won by grafting and getting the bit of luck needed.. We were really really bad for long periods today.. I agree he isnt really brilliant or a fraud he is just a really good manager who's team was smarter, hungrier and out fought us..
 
He can’t win without world class players in every position. His style of football is fantastic but he’s not winning the Champions League with Porto, not in a million years. His City side was shocking last season, it took another £300m to get them decent. But yeh best manager ever.
 
Win a CL with a team like Porto or Inter and then we'll judge him. Until then he won't be in same league as Mourinho or Fergie in my book.

To take over the best sides in every league with all the talent in the world at his disposal is not worship worthy. If he went to Arsenal, Spurs, Everton or Liverpool and managed to run away with the league like that I'd be more impressed.

Also don't forget he won the CL only with Barca, couldn't achieve that with Bayern or City (yet anyway).
 
Guardiola is a phenomenal manager. He's done his way at Barca, Bayern and now Munich. However, I think this City side would be nothin without De Bruyne and Silva. They pull all the strings. If they get injured or suspended for whatever reason, I think City wouldn't be half as good. I think they'd struggle both away from home and at home.
Just like the Barca wouldn't have been as successful without Messi & Xavi (as well as Iniesta to a slightly lesser extent), just as RM wouldn't be as successful without CR7, Modric & Kroos. And the same goes for many other great teams that have existed... Point being that every great team always has 1 or 2 exceptionnal talents, it's normal.
 
Win a CL with a team like Porto or Inter and then we'll judge him. Until then he won't be in same league as Mourinho or Fergie in my book.

To take over the best sides in every league with all the talent in the world at his disposal is not worship worthy. If he went to Arsenal, Spurs, Everton or Liverpool and managed to run away with the league like that I'd be more impressed.

Also don't forget he won the CL only with Barca, couldn't achieve that with Bayern or City (yet anyway).

People don't see it like that though, that's the problem! He just can't do no wrong at the moment. He's a visionary and the best manager in the world according to some even though he's won nothing with City yet. He would never go to a club where he's not able to manufacture success. His next job will be PSG.
 
People don't see it like that though, that's the problem! He just can't do no wrong at the moment. He's a visionary and the best manager in the world according to some even though he's won nothing with City yet. He would never go to a club where he's not able to manufacture success. His next job will be PSG.

Yep.

Wish they draw Real Madrid tomorrow so that wankfest will be over.
 
Win a CL with a team like Porto or Inter and then we'll judge him. Until then he won't be in same league as Mourinho or Fergie in my book.

To take over the best sides in every league with all the talent in the world at his disposal is not worship worthy. If he went to Arsenal, Spurs, Everton or Liverpool and managed to run away with the league like that I'd be more impressed.

Also don't forget he won the CL only with Barca, couldn't achieve that with Bayern or City (yet anyway).

Inter had a great team, Jose did not win tht CL with a bunch of nobodies and he also failed to win the CL with a great RM team. His Porto team had great talents too who went on to establish themselves as world class players. Fergie didn't win the CL either with average players.

Which City players were considered world class, the best in their positions and were being chased heavily by bigger clubs before Pep arrived ?
 
The guy is still 46. It’s just ridiculous. People can moan all they want about the money spent but at the end of the day you can’t buy that kind of coaching and that style of football.

He’ll leave City in a couple of years and manage PSG and then Napoli, then end his career with 5 or so years of managing Brazil. Then he’ll either go back to Barca and pull a Fergie, or manage clubs in other continents or retire.

Nonsense. He’s fecking off to Qatar end of next season to take over their national team ahead of the 2022 World Cup. Then he’ll likely retire early having cashed in.

He’s a good manager but sadly he’s just become a shill to help launder the reputation of a couple of ugly, repressive and abusive regimes.
 
Just a quick question on the "we were really bad today brigade" (and you were, I'll post my feelings on your manager at a later date when I probably won't get banned.

Do you think its just a coincidence that this season United, Chelsea, Napoli for 45 minutes and almost every other team we beat this season have had a bad day or an off night. That every night we "were there for the taking" but our opponents just didn't take us? Maybe its just maybe that Pep's teams don't allow the opposition the chance to take them?
 
The pep's a** kissing begins one again. I dread this. Everytime this guy does something good he is proclaimed as the greatest just like when he falls is proclaimed as a fraud. He is neither the greatest nor a fraud.

But why do you want to be reasonable here? That’s unacceptable!
 
Just a quick question on the "we were really bad today brigade" (and you were, I'll post my feelings on your manager at a later date when I probably won't get banned.

Do you think its just a coincidence that this season United, Chelsea, Napoli for 45 minutes and almost every other team we beat this season have had a bad day or an off night. That every night we "were there for the taking" but our opponents just didn't take us? Maybe its just maybe that Pep's teams don't allow the opposition the chance to take them?
Funny thing is you scored from 2 defensive errors today. So..

So did we but the defeat was avoidable.
 
Also don't forget he won the CL only with Barca, couldn't achieve that with Bayern or City (yet anyway).
Bayern was the best team in the world in 2015/16. Not Pep's fault that Muller missed his penalty. The way they dominated Atletico at the Allianz was a sight to behold. Simeone said after the game that it was the best team he's ever faced.
 
Bayern was the best team in the world in 2015/16. Not Pep's fault that Muller missed his penalty. The way they dominated Atletico at the Allianz was a sight to behold. Simeone said after the game that it was the best team he's ever faced.
Were they now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.