Is Mou still 'The Special One' for you all?

Status
Not open for further replies.
and if Mourinho wins the league next season, will you eat the humble pie, admit you were wrong and apologize?


Martial went through a divorce - I doubt any coach could get much out of him until he sorted out his personal issues.

Comments by Shaw himself debunks your claims http://www.espnfc.us/manchester-uni...-shaw-i-told-jose-mourinho-id-prove-him-wrong.

Rashford has been getting significant minutes, and if he was more clinical with his opportunities, would likely be in th conversation with Mbappe

You cannot expect a coach to transform a club without bringing in players that would help him implement his ideas. Mourinho spent £150m on Pogba, Mikhi ans Bailly, while Conte also spent £120m on Kante, David Luiz, Alonso and Batshuayi. Keep in mind that Conte inherited a much better squad than Mourinho did and I dont see the youth players he is developing. Spurs have young players, but they havent won anything since Poch took over

If you want to develop a team around teenage players, then be prepared to wait 4-7yrs trophyless for them to develop.
Someone promote this man.
 
Two things which grate because they are incredibly lazy are a) the idea that because Mourinho had a CV full of trophies appointing him was a no brainer, and b) that the squad left behind was "simply not up to standard".

Lets start with Mourinho and his CV. I appreciate that he has a glittering array of trophies, however the reality is so does Fabio Capello yet by the time he was England manager he was no longer fit for purpose. Some would argue he had long before that passed his best. The point is simply that a CV alone isn't the way you judge whether a manager is the right appointment. You look at the make up of the squad you have, what their needs will be, what kind of football you want to play, what kind representation the new manager will be for the club, how they will evolve the club, what their past tells you about what their limitations may be.

With Mourinho it was clear that although he passed the "CV" test, he failed every other one when it came to choosing a United manager. Style of play? None existent. Worst still, he's a reactive manager who simply waits for the opponents to make mistakes whilst setting his own team up to minimise risk and the mistakes they make. The antithesis of both United and of our greatest ever manager.

How did he fit with the make up of the squad? Not very well at all. Even a cursory bit of research would've shown that far from being the 'youth' promoter that Mourinho has tried to paint himself as, he's the death knell for the careers of most young players when he arrives at a club. At United it's no different. Fosu-Mensah? Looked good enough to be a PL footballer. Not anymore. Rashford? Burnt out mentally and physically and ZERO progress in his actual play. Martial? Gone backwards. Shaw? Pretty clear what's happened there. So where are the young players flourishing pointing the way for the rest of the kids we hope to recruit and develop? In the meantime what are we doing. Buying READY MADE ESTABLISHED players and blocking the development of our best young players because we have a coach who can't coach them to improve.

So lets talk about this squad of ours that's "not up to standard". Frankly, that's such a disgraceful comment I'm staggered quite so many of our supporters blindly parrot it. It's the scars of successive underperforming managers obfuscating the truth. The fact is even before the influx of Mourinho players last summer our squad was superior to that of Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs. Both in terms of depth and quality. That's why we were so furious with LVG and Moyes, because they were UNDERPERFORMING. Yet now suddenly with another 200 million spent on players and this coach who's meant to be proven and the best, we're suddenly devoid of quality players. Frankly it's bollocks.

Time to stop making excuses for Mourinho. He has had a shit season at best, and winning the Europa league having beaten nobody of literally any worth will not paper over that. Next season if we don't challenge for the title the man should be sacked. If he isn't it'll just reinforce what shabbily run club we are becoming from top to bottom.

This is a very poor post.
 
We are not even that far off the top. We should be in second really. Mourinho is the best man for the job. Granted he will probably only stay four years maximum.
 
We are not even that far off the top. We should be in second really. Mourinho is the best man for the job. Granted he will probably only stay four years maximum.
Why should we be in 2nd?
 
Just a little patience guys. We are forgetting that we have a new coach who was handed over a mismanaged under confident team in serious need of a overhaul.

When Pochettino took over he had finished 5th in his first season. In his second season (which is last year) he finished 3rd but that was when Leicester won the league and he just had 5 more points that us and our season was declared as a debacle and got our manager fired. Klopp took over Liverpool and finished 8th and is into his 2nd season and things still don't look great there (though they are better than us at the moment).

I think no matter how prepared or good a manager is, it takes him about a year to steady things. We have good players and a good manager. A strong work ethic has been developed and much of the deadwood has been moved on. Just a few tweaks are needed here and there. We will surely get there.
 
So lets talk about this squad of ours that's "not up to standard". Frankly, that's such a disgraceful comment I'm staggered quite so many of our supporters blindly parrot it. It's the scars of successive underperforming managers obfuscating the truth. The fact is even before the influx of Mourinho players last summer our squad was superior to that of Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs. Both in terms of depth and quality. That's why we were so furious with LVG and Moyes, because they were UNDERPERFORMING. Yet now suddenly with another 200 million spent on players and this coach who's meant to be proven and the best, we're suddenly devoid of quality players. Frankly it's bollocks.
You seem to be pretty serious with your comments, which could only mean you have a severe blind spot when assessing this squad. I would say LvG overachieved with the players he had. Without Zlatan we're mid table and Jose might have already been run out.
 
You seem to be pretty serious with your comments, which could only mean you have a severe blind spot when assessing this squad. I would say LvG overachieved with the players he had. Without Zlatan we're mid table and Jose might have already been run out.
I think that is a bit unfair. We have a squad which is littered with international players and promising youth. Agree we do not have any world class players. We have a string attack, even in comparison to the team's above us in the league, but we don't have a striker that scares the sh*t out of defences. We have a solid, if not creative midfield, but no one who can control the midfield, we have a fairly competent backline, but no one who can dominate a WC striker.

Our main issues have been with the last 3 managers approach and tactics. I never really understood what Moyes was trying to do. LVG was the lean man, structure and no wastage, and thus no creativity and no risk. Jose, shackles players with zonal play and 'not lose' rather 'play to win' mentality.

The players over the last 3 years have played some wonderful and some dreadful play. The wonderful lasts for a very short time and has been infrequent. There has to be a question on the managers role in this.
 
I think that is a bit unfair. We have a squad which is littered with international players and promising youth. Agree we do not have any world class players. We have a string attack, even in comparison to the team's above us in the league, but we don't have a striker that scares the sh*t out of defences. We have a solid, if not creative midfield, but no one who can control the midfield, we have a fairly competent backline, but no one who can dominate a WC striker.

Our main issues have been with the last 3 managers approach and tactics. I never really understood what Moyes was trying to do. LVG was the lean man, structure and no wastage, and thus no creativity and no risk. Jose, shackles players with zonal play and 'not lose' rather 'play to win' mentality.

The players over the last 3 years have played some wonderful and some dreadful play. The wonderful lasts for a very short time and has been infrequent. There has to be a question on the managers role in this.
Of course the managers cannot be absolved from this, but I look at where players are ending up after they leave us these past few years and bar DiMaria all have gone to significantly lesser clubs with much lower expectations. I think we'll see the same thing with players leaving this summer.
 
and if Mourinho wins the league next season, will you eat the humble pie, admit you were wrong and apologize?


Martial went through a divorce - I doubt any coach could get much out of him until he sorted out his personal issues.

Comments by Shaw himself debunks your claims http://www.espnfc.us/manchester-uni...-shaw-i-told-jose-mourinho-id-prove-him-wrong.

Rashford has been getting significant minutes, and if he was more clinical with his opportunities, would likely be in th conversation with Mbappe

You cannot expect a coach to transform a club without bringing in players that would help him implement his ideas. Mourinho spent £150m on Pogba, Mikhi ans Bailly, while Conte also spent £120m on Kante, David Luiz, Alonso and Batshuayi. Keep in mind that Conte inherited a much better squad than Mourinho did and I dont see the youth players he is developing. Spurs have young players, but they havent won anything since Poch took over

If you want to develop a team around teenage players, then be prepared to wait 4-7yrs trophyless for them to develop.

You've left out so many bits an pieces here. When comparing players signed with Conté you've just left Ibra off the list. Yeah he was free but he's still a significant player coming in.

Then you compare Mou to Pochettino and point out the latter hasn't won anything with Spurs. Would it also not be fair to mention he can't spend anywhere near as much? Is it inconceivable that had he signed Zlatan, Pogba and Mkhi in the summer Spurs would be even higher?

The statement about Martial is sweeping. You know little about his situation and therefore how much his personal life has affected him professionally. Clearly Mourinho disagrees with you as he expects more.

You can't just point out all the circumstances that hold Mourinho back and negate to mention the challenges other managers have to deal with.
 
Has Jose Mourinho even been in charge of Manchester United for one year?

Nope.

Chill guys. Have some patience. They don't call him one of the very best for nothing. He can be accused of many things but most experts agree he's a pretty good manager and he sure is.

One trophy already. I'm betting he'll win the Europa and get United back in the Champions League and next season, United will be right in the mix for the title.

His comments already show that he knows what the problems are: not finishing well, not killing off games, not making the right decisions at crucial moments etc. There's no doubt he'll be working at fixing those problems next season.

The thing is Jose must know this is judgement time for him. If he messes up this job, his reputation will be taking a very bad hit. He'll be a fool not to give it his beat shot.
 
You've left out so many bits an pieces here. When comparing players signed with Conté you've just left Ibra off the list. Yeah he was free but he's still a significant player coming in.

Then you compare Mou to Pochettino and point out the latter hasn't won anything with Spurs. Would it also not be fair to mention he can't spend anywhere near as much? Is it inconceivable that had he signed Zlatan, Pogba and Mkhi in the summer Spurs would be even higher?

The statement about Martial is sweeping. You know little about his situation and therefore how much his personal life has affected him professionally. Clearly Mourinho disagrees with you as he expects more.

You can't just point out all the circumstances that hold Mourinho back and negate to mention the challenges other managers have to deal with.


So which of Jose's circumstances / teams will be fair enough to compare with Poch's? I think Porto and Inter would be appropriate in terms of money available. Well they both won the treble. Spurs hasn't won anything under Poch.
 
Mourinho didnt help himself with his subs and decision to sit back....can't understand the Fellaini introduction but not the first, second or third time it's happened.... he complains about a lack of cutting edge in the attacking players but they've been consistently unproductive- im not sure what he expects to get out of Lingard and Zlatan as usual has some lovely touches without really impacting

I think Mourinho might buy 3 attacking players this Summer to try and fix the issues we are having

at the same time he needs to stop being negative


Is there any manager in the world, worth his salt who would ask his team to defend a one goal lead at half time? I doubt there is. From Jose's comments, he was clearly upset the lads didn't go for more goals to finish off the game.
 
Jose is doing the same mistakes over and over again. By now, he really should know that we don't have the players or quality to see a game out, but he keeps trying as it's what he knows. But it doesn't work. Frustrating


But his post match comments show that he was upset his team sat back and his attackers didn't go for more goals. . How come people conclude he actually instructed his team to sit back?
 
So which of Jose's circumstances / teams will be fair enough to compare with Poch's? I think Porto and Inter would be appropriate in terms of money available. Well they both won the treble. Spurs hasn't won anything under Poch.

I'm not really interested in comparing Pochettino and Mourinho by looking at what they did with teams a decade apart. Far too much faff.

The post I quoted was talking about this season. My only point being it seems fair to mention Poch didn't get to sign the worlds most expensive player this summer for example.
 
Ok, I didn't want Jose as our manager, but now he is here, i'm totally behind him. I do think we will get beaten tomorrow, because Chelsea are a class above us this season and, with City winning again today, I think the chances of top 4 will be put to bed by tomorrow afternoon. Does this make me change my mind on Jose - well not really, I think he is as good as anyone to get us back to the top, but I am very disappointed with how this season has panned out. The football has been pretty disastrous really given the supposed quality in the squad.
Jose's inability to get a tune out of Martial, Rashford and Miki for the majority of their time on the pitch is probably the most disappointing thing for me.
It just seems that for the last 3 years, I've been saying to myself 'if only we could have turned them x number of draws into wins, then we will be 2/3'. Anyone else? Nothing much has changed when you think back.
 
Is there any manager in the world, worth his salt who would ask his team to defend a one goal lead at half time? I doubt there is. From Jose's comments, he was clearly upset the lads didn't go for more goals to finish off the game.
i'm talking about the point in the second half where Rashford disappears and Fellaini appears.....

if thats an attempt to improve your goal chances then Mourinho needs a slap
 
You've left out so many bits an pieces here. When comparing players signed with Conté you've just left Ibra off the list. Yeah he was free but he's still a significant player coming in.

Then you compare Mou to Pochettino and point out the latter hasn't won anything with Spurs. Would it also not be fair to mention he can't spend anywhere near as much? Is it inconceivable that had he signed Zlatan, Pogba and Mkhi in the summer Spurs would be even higher?

The statement about Martial is sweeping. You know little about his situation and therefore how much his personal life has affected him professionally. Clearly Mourinho disagrees with you as he expects more.

You can't just point out all the circumstances that hold Mourinho back and negate to mention the challenges other managers have to deal with.
1. Ibra was a free agent because he is a 35yr old man, who has been playing top flight football for over 15yrs, and has been in decline for quite a few years. Such players are stop gap measures (like Eto and Drogba in his second stint at Chelsea) but if you insist on adding Zlatan to the list of Mourinho, you still end up with just 4 players (same as conte).

2. The comparison to Poch, is in regards to the "playing youth" argument, and low budget is not an excuse when Leceister, with the 4th least expensive squad, manage (against all odds) to win the League. LC, FA or EL silverware are reasonable expectations for a club of Spurs stature and the leagues 6th most expensive squad.

3. Martial divorce has been in the news often enough, with his ex-wife Samantha seeming to relish the publicity. It is not a stretch to imagine how such could affect a 21yr old kid (even grown men have been known to be adversely affected by such). That Mourinho expects more from him does not negate the challenges the kid has been facing.

4. Every manager has challenges and benefits intheir own situations, and I have always said that apples to apples comparison are difficult in life scenarios. I only raised my points to refute those that seem to ignore such peculiarities. My preference is to judge a manager or player for what he has achieved given his specific scenario (both benefit and challenges). For example, I dont fault Moyes for failing to deliver silverware given the roster he had (as I felt SAF had squeezed out the last juice from those players) but what I do fault him for was for failing to improve the squad by bringing in quality players that would help him implement his ideas (instead he was pursuing Bale and CR - WTF!)
 
But his post match comments show that he was upset his team sat back and his attackers didn't go for more goals. . How come people conclude he actually instructed his team to sit back?

So, what you are saying is he can't control the team?
 
You seem to be pretty serious with your comments, which could only mean you have a severe blind spot when assessing this squad. I would say LvG overachieved with the players he had. Without Zlatan we're mid table and Jose might have already been run out.
If LVG overachieved then surely the board should have given him another season to sign the "world class" front line he needed to make his philosophy effective?
 
So which of Jose's circumstances / teams will be fair enough to compare with Poch's? I think Porto and Inter would be appropriate in terms of money available. Well they both won the treble. Spurs hasn't won anything under Poch.
Porto have always been won of the leading teams in their country. Even after their sell off post Jose, they continued to win back to back titles, 7 in 8 seasons. I believe they are the biggest team in portugal. Inter Milan were THE dominant team in Italy and had something like 5 consecutive titles. Spurs were someone who hoped and prayed they could just get into the CL places. The Champions League wins for Jose were his greatest tactical successes in my opinion, especially since beating Peps Barca. For me that was his best night and I was well behind him.
It is obviously tougher for Poch to win Silverware when he is in a country where many teams have bigger budgets and Tottenham aren't historically one of the leading teams so he is doing a sterling job. If he wins an FA cup then I think he is on the right track. It is still early days and the break down last season was bad, but then these players are not used to these dizzying heights. He is on the right track.
 
Well, United are shit for a team with our resources, and struggling against fellow underachievers. The power balance, so to speak, could very well remain the same (or similar) if we manage to become an actual top team again - because our rivals could do the same - but at the moment the state of those rivals is something United should take advantage of: It's certainly not a valid excuse for our struggles.
 
It's interesting that Mourinho got the four main targets he wanted in the summer but yet is now saying his forwards aren't scoring enough. Surely, that's his fault though? He spent a tremendous amount of money on those targets.

Shouldn't such a great manager (and he sure says a lot how marvelous he is) have anticipated that his current squad will have problems in front of goal? What was the weird thing at the start of the season with him and Mkhitaryan and why has Martial regressed so much under him? Those are simple but fair questions United fans deserve an answer for.
 
It's interesting that Mourinho got the four main targets he wanted in the summer but yet is now saying his forwards aren't scoring enough. Surely, that's his fault though? He spent a tremendous amount of money on those targets.

Shouldn't such a great manager (and he sure says a lot how marvelous he is) have anticipated that his current squad will have problems in front of goal? What was the weird thing at the start of the season with him and Mkhitaryan and why has Martial regressed so much under him? Those are simple but fair questions United fans deserve an answer for.

He said attackers aren't scoring lot of goals which is true. Apart from Zlatan other attackers haven't contributed much in goal scoring dept.

So manager should anticipate everything and get it right in the first season?

Bold part: Chelsea fans have lot of problems with their ex manager. Trying their utmost best with all the cheap shots.
 
Ok maybe second is pushing it, but third. If we took all those draws at home where we dominated, we would be third.
Do you not think that City and Liverpool are also bemoaning the fact that they screwed up opportunities to score plenty more goals and pick up more points?
Chelsea will win the PL because they've managed games well and had a bit of luck, injuries wise.
 
It's interesting that Mourinho got the four main targets he wanted in the summer but yet is now saying his forwards aren't scoring enough. Surely, that's his fault though? He spent a tremendous amount of money on those targets.

Shouldn't such a great manager (and he sure says a lot how marvelous he is) have anticipated that his current squad will have problems in front of goal? What was the weird thing at the start of the season with him and Mkhitaryan and why has Martial regressed so much under him? Those are simple but fair questions United fans deserve an answer for.
I agree with most of that.

I usually bring that kind of point to people who said our squad was shit and need to replace to 'score more'. Well, that means we need to replace his 3 of 4 signings as well?

People talk about how great he is in signings and they are part of if not main the problem that we can't score atm.

I don't say they are shit or we don't need any new players at all.

In fact we made 2nd most chances in the league but no, the squad is shit.

Well, it hardly makes sense and it is pretty weird anyway with some people making their points with all of those.
 
You have to give a manager time to assess the situation, and hopefully rectify mistakes from his first season.

Moyes tried to be the big man changing everything, had nothing to offer and we were getting progressively worse. Going from 1st to 7th was a disgrace, with basically the same players. There was no way the club could of given him a second season.

VG first season had some good bits and it looked like the 2nd season we would kick on, playing good football, and ...but it didnt, it was dire and lets leave it at that.

Mourinho has improved our style of play overall, we moved on from creating very few chances, to the 2nd highest in the league. Also won a trophy and maybe we will finish with 2 and maybe top 4. Hopefully next season we can convert these chances a lot more and win more trophies.
He bought 4 players in who havent played in the Premier before (Pogba played 5-6 years ago in 2-3 games) and marking out of 10 for the season so far, I would give Zlatan 8 the rest 6/10, hopefully they will kick on, Zlatan may leave of course.

Yes there are problems. Sometimes we play it too slow going forward and still pass it 10-12 times around the back ala VG style, instead of moving it forward quickly.

Martial for whatever reason has regressed, thats why Mourhino reluctantly plays him. Is that Mourinho though? Is it Martials head, going through a divorce and not seeing his kid? Is it 2nd season syndrome? or is it he was a flash in the pan, who other teams defenders now know how to play him?

Shaw. Is that Mourinho? Or is it he hasnt shown enough in training, or has the leg break made him mentally weak?.

Rashford. I think he has had loads of chances by Mourinho and I think its just bad finishing by him, along with some defenders knowing now how to play him. Maybe 2nd season syndrome has gotten to him. Its up to him to move on next season.

Lets see what happens in the summer and ultimately next season. Then we will know if he is the 'special' one or the 'hasbeen' one. I have a feeling next season will be a good one for us. Mind you I thought the same with VG lol:)
 
I'm not really interested in comparing Pochettino and Mourinho by looking at what they did with teams a decade apart. Far too much faff.

The post I quoted was talking about this season. My only point being it seems fair to mention Poch didn't get to sign the worlds most expensive player this summer for example.

Fair enough but it's also worth considering the fact that buying the world's most expensive players comes with its own challenges, distractions and complications. People are always quick to equate spending big budgets with winning automatically. But I think that's looking at only one side of having much money to spend. People forget it comes with pressure, criticisms, unrealistic expectations, big egos to manage and the constant threat of being fired. Football has shown us that spending the most money in the transfer market does not equate with automatically winning. There are few managers who can manage very big teams well.
 
So, what you are saying is he can't control the team?

Maybe. Maybe not.

When a team fails to follow a manager's instructions, it is due to one of the following: the manager can't control his players, the players are not good enough or they are simply having a bad spell.
 
After the seeing the shameful lineup he's putting out against the league leaders I think he should be called the spineless one from now on.
 
Does Jose have any reason to play games with the board - in terms of team selection, dealing with the press, selecting captains? I.e. is there any evidence that the board won't be willing to back him 100% in the summer with significant investment?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.