- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
- Messages
- 30,017
Well, at least they'll struggle to de-select Umunna when the revolution comes.
I don't think any of the really prominent Labour politicians are in too much trouble. Their constituents will back them.
Well, at least they'll struggle to de-select Umunna when the revolution comes.
I think whichever side your loyalty is, we can all agree Labour are truly terrible at trying to oust their leaders.
To be fair this was a pretty perfect ousting attempt for any leader of a major political party in recent history. It was said the other day that John Smith didn't feel it was necessary to put in the rulebook that a no-confidence vote automatically resulted in the leader getting the boot, it was just seen as a given (for comparison, IDS lost his no-confidence vote "only" 90-75). Ditto if you can't string together enough MPs to fill a front bench whilst in opposition.I think whichever side your loyalty is, we can all agree Labour are truly terrible at trying to oust their leaders.
Well, at least they'll struggle to de-select Umunna when the revolution comes.
It's not like they weren't aware Corbyn feels he has the option to be on the ballot... And apparently the best alternative is Angela Eagle. It looks pretty mindlessly done, to me. The anti-Corbyns are as chaotic as the pro-Corbyns.To be fair this was a pretty perfect ousting attempt for any leader of a major political party in recent history. It was said the other day that John Smith didn't feel it was necessary to put in the rulebook that a no-confidence vote automatically resulted in the leader getting the boot, it was just seen as a given (for comparison, IDS lost his no-confidence vote "only" 90-75). Ditto if you can't string together enough MPs to fill a front bench whilst in opposition.
Corbyn's reign is just all-round odd.
I fecking hate Umunna. I'll sign up to the Labour party just to get rid of that smug bellend as my MP.
It's not like they weren't aware Corbyn feels he has the option to be on the ballot... And apparently the best alternative is Angela Eagle. It looks pretty mindlessly done, to me. The anti-Corbyns are as chaotic as the pro-Corbyns.
It is laughable isn't it? All this guff about "wanting to be more electable" and the great abstainers have seemingly nominated the most boring person in British politics as their great hope for the future.It's not like they weren't aware Corbyn feels he has the option to be on the ballot... And apparently the best alternative is Angela Eagle. It looks pretty mindlessly done, to me. The anti-Corbyns are as chaotic as the pro-Corbyns.
No-one's as boring as Jez. She's actually a pretty good Commons performer, as well.It is laughable isn't it? All this guff about "wanting to be more electable" and the great abstainers have seemingly nominated the most boring person in British politics as their great hope for the future.
Maybe from a press strategy perspective. They should by now know what they are up against.
But the amount of twisting that has had to take place for this to turn into an anti Corbyn story is ridiculous:
You not only have to deliberately misquote him, but you also have to utterly ignore the context of the misquote (he was saying that just as we shouldn't blame Muslims for the actions of x, we shouldn't blame Jews for the actions of the Israeli state). Even if he had said Islamic State, its an evocation against anti-Semitism, not an example of it.
They should've known the second he was elected. He took over from a man whose dead father was slandered by a National paper, who then lost an election by eating a sandwich badly. Only realising now is a coup-worthy offense in itself!
Again, whilst partly true (and trust me, I'm relatively pro-Corbyn as things go, just ask @MikeUpNorth) the very fact it's such an easily misquotable statement is a worry all it's own. Arguing over whether he meant an Islamic State or the Islamic state is an entry level headache, easily avoided with any small modicum of common sense or tact. This isn't the Student Union newsletter, it's a statement by the Parliamentary leader of the opposition! The very fact he chose to mention Israel and any variety of hypothetical Islamic States in the same sentence, let alone at all, during a conference addressing anti-semitism within the Labour party, should've been a fog horn in the ears of any semi-conscious public relations team, however overworked and coke addled.
It was a potential clusterfeck of contextual tone deafness waiting to happen, which shouldn't have been allowed to.
No-one's as boring as Jez. She's actually a pretty good Commons performer, as well.
I'd possibly consider backing Shami for leader. Definitely her over any of our esteemed abstainers.
"She should be running the country, at the head of a party, Shami Chakrabarti".I'd possibly consider backing Shami for leader. Definitely her over any of our esteemed abstainers.
Shami said she saw it before he spoke and thought it fine. She's really angry about how this has been twisted. I don't blame her.
Not a bad idea! She's been a member for 2 months now... maybe she can replace one of the outgoing MPs. Doubt she would want to though.
New poll of Labour members, has Corbyn 50-47. Winnable.
Oh, God. I was largely not giving a toss but if these puns are a sign of an Angela shaped future, then I'm Corbyn all the way.The Eagle soars. Always knew she was a good egg.
Not having been part of this shit show would be a huge positive for her. That and the fact she's fecking brilliant.
Not against Eagle to be fair, just 'would vote for/wouldn't vote for'. Massive drop for him compared to last one though in both vote share and approval. More say he should resign now than lead Labour into next GE.The Eagle soars. Always knew she was a good egg.
They should've known the second he was elected. He took over from a man whose dead father was slandered by a National paper, who then lost an election by eating a sandwich badly. Only realising now is a coup-worthy offense in itself!
Again, whilst partly true (and trust me, I'm relatively pro-Corbyn as things go, just ask @MikeUpNorth) the very fact it's such an easily misquotable statement is a worry all it's own. Arguing over whether he meant an Islamic State or the Islamic state is an entry level headache, easily avoided with any small modicum of common sense or tact. This isn't the Student Union newsletter, it's a statement by the Parliamentary leader of the opposition! The very fact he chose to mention Israel and any variety of hypothetical Islamic States in the same sentence, let alone at all, during a conference addressing anti-semitism within the Labour party, should've been a fog horn in the ears of any semi-conscious public relations team, however overworked and coke addled.
It was a potential clusterfeck of contextual tone deafness waiting to happen, which shouldn't have been allowed to.
Not against Eagle to be fair, just 'would vote for/wouldn't vote for'. Massive drop for him compared to last one though in both vote share and approval. More say he should resign now than lead Labour into next GE.
I think definitely, yeah. It would be political suicide if you challenge Corbyn and lose, and if he doesn't resign then we don't really know what the membership would do. I imagine the genuine candidates see it as too much of a risk.@Ubik Do you think if Corbyn had resigned, at the same time as Cameron, saying he'd lost an important vote and felt he should go, that someone rather more credible than Angela Eagle would've put their name up? Is it the fear of the backlash, that is stopping those who, in the longer term, aim to lead the party?
@Ubik Do you think if Corbyn had resigned, at the same time as Cameron, saying he'd lost an important vote and felt he should go, that someone rather more credible than Angela Eagle would've put their name up? Is it the fear of the backlash, that is stopping those who, in the longer term, aim to lead the party?
This is my feeling. Which is why I wanted him to resign, straight away, and why I don't see the point in him going now - he can't go now without it being obvious he was forced out and angering his supporters.I think definitely, yeah. It would be political suicide if you challenge Corbyn and lose, and if he doesn't resign then we don't really know what the membership would do. I imagine the genuine candidates see it as too much of a risk.
Yeah definitely, there'd be a proper contest. People don't want to put themselves forward for the 1-on-1 when it's known how strong he's been with the membership and a loss would wreck their future prospects. Eagle has nothing to lose, is widely respected within the PLP and has a chance of flipping the unions, good personal story etc. As I said a few days back, she's far from my ideal candidate but would at least be able to pick from all MPs to form a front bench, is better in the chamber than Corbyn, trained economist.@Ubik Do you think if Corbyn had resigned, at the same time as Cameron, saying he'd lost an important vote and felt he should go, that someone rather more credible than Angela Eagle would've put their name up? Is it the fear of the backlash, that is stopping those who, in the longer term, aim to lead the party?
Now you're just trying to excite us.I'm basically begging them, mouth open and legs splayed?
Eagle wouldn't win a haircut competition against Boris in her own campaign office. Her Iraq vote and high profile coup rep will doom her before she even gets a word out. Yet I am pretty fascinated by who's been puffing her up behind the scenes, to the point where she genuinely seems to believe she can win a leadership battle (against a cult youth figure, no less) let alone a potential GE, from the outside Foinavon position.
This is my problem with the coup, and why I still can't get behind it, even though I'm basically begging them, mouth open and legs splayed, to convince me. If the purpose is to oust Corbyn in favour of a more electable candidate for a snap election, then what barmy, off kilter, deaf, dumb, blind and pinball logic says Angela fecking Eagle can improve on Corbyn's popularity?...Let alone unite the party and win round the public!?
Is everyone in Westminster making their decisions with those origami paper fortune tellers girls used in primary school?
The only poll that matters is the membership vote. If Corbyn keeps his nerve he will pull through.
But they got to call for Tony Blair to face trial for war crimes, totally worth it.And then the party will split.