Smores
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2011
- Messages
- 25,804
It has always been the case that you had to be a member for a period of time to vote to pick your local MP candidate or local councillors and it would seem logical that the same reasoning would apply to a voting for the leader - the strange thing was allowing people in the previous election to join up and vote straight away - I honestly don'y recall much wailing and gnashing of teeth over the years regarding the selection process that had always been in place.
Corbyn will win - the party will split then momentum can put whatever new selection process in place they want - presumably across the board for all levels of representation... I await with much anticipation to see how many Burgon clones they can find to stand for power because at least when you have people that incompetent put in front of microphones you are guaranteed a but of light entertainment.
Its easy to pick a thread of logic out of any situation to try and indirectly argue against a point. What you've said is logical but its also not what people are up in arms about. No one would have cared if it was decided months ago its the fact it was done for political purpose and after their campaigns to get people to join up and vote.
The argument that the right of the party can offer better leadership is laughable when they can't see that through such obvious scheming and constant bullshit they're just burying the valid criticisms. If 80% of what you see is agenda driven crap no one is going to believe the other 20%
Thats politicians for you i guess.