Jeremy Corbyn - Not Not Labour Party(?), not a Communist (BBC)

I don't believe Johnson is personally an Islamophobe, but I do think he's paying deliberate lip service to a demographic that are. I mean he could have easily made the point without resorting to the colourful name-calling. And what of the water-melon smiles? What was his underlying point with that one?

Johnson has a fairly multicultural family, his great grandfather was a Turkish Muslim and the mother of his children is half Indian.
 
What I meant was the Europeans aren't lobbing rockets into Margate or planting bombs in shopping precinct rubbish bins.
Forgive me - for some reason, if often takes me several attempts to make myself clear. I was basically stating the obvious, I guess: that addressing people of all kinds as 'friends' is merely standard for politicians on public occasions. It's politeness with a view towards improved relations.
 
Forgive me - for some reason, if often takes me several attempts to make myself clear. I was basically stating the obvious, I guess: that addressing people of all kinds as 'friends' is merely standard for politicians on public occasions. It's politeness with a view towards improved relations.
I wouldn't address someone that I considered a terrorist who had killed my countrymen as 'friend' nor would I expect them to refer to me as one. I'm sure during the GFA negotiations the word 'friend' wasn't being bandied around. The removal of the word 'ememy' should be all that is needed to negotiate a peace. 'Friends' is for later - or never in some cases.
 
I wouldn't address someone that I considered a terrorist who had killed my countrymen as 'friend' nor would I expect them to refer to me as one. I'm sure during the GFA negotiations the word 'friend' wasn't being bandied around. The removal of the word 'ememy' should be all that is needed to negotiate a peace. 'Friends' is for later - or never in some cases.

So you're just upset by the terminology and not the action?
 
I wouldn't address someone that I considered a terrorist who had killed my countrymen as 'friend' nor would I expect them to refer to me as one. I'm sure during the GFA negotiations the word 'friend' wasn't being bandied around. The removal of the word 'ememy' should be all that is needed to negotiate a peace. 'Friends' is for later - or never in some cases.
Progress relies on conciliation, even if that apparent submissiveness is simply for show.
 
So you're just upset by the terminology and not the action?
Peace negotiations should be pragmatic and pay due respect to the other's POV. They should put the common good first. I doubt any peace negotiation has ever been a love-in with people calling one another friends and what not.

Yes the action is fine.

But Corbyn standing on a platform and using the term 'our friends in Hezbollah' is more than a call for peace, it is a statement of solidarity in my view.
 
I wouldn't address someone that I considered a terrorist who had killed my countrymen as 'friend' nor would I expect them to refer to me as one. I'm sure during the GFA negotiations the word 'friend' wasn't being bandied around. The removal of the word 'ememy' should be all that is needed to negotiate a peace. 'Friends' is for later - or never in some cases.
That's a very simplistic view of a very complex situation.

Ultimately it was a desperate situation over the long term that required people to go above and beyond 'norms' to gain peace, which was the ultimate goal.

Some in public, some in secret talks. Like the UK government, for example in 1981 and 1990 as detailed below. But it was imperative to get peace talks going ahead in the context of mistrust and disillusionment from all parties.

Margaret Thatcher 'negotiated with IRA'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-16366413

Thatcher started IRA talks in 1990
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/thatcher-started-ira-talks-in-1990-1305896.html
 
Peace negotiations should be pragmatic and pay due respect to the other's POV. They should put the common good first. I doubt any peace negotiation has ever been a love-in with people calling one another friends and what not.

Yes the action is fine.

But Corbyn standing on a platform and using the term 'our friends in Hezbollah' is more than a call for peace, it is a statement of solidarity in my view.


Do you think Thatcher was expressing solidarity with Pinochet when she called him a 'true friend'?
 
Johnson’s great-grandfather was lynched for alleged treason. Selling out your country must run in the blood.

As for Farage, I thought he was of Huguenot stock?

Farage's great great grandfather was a German immigrant in the mid 1800s - his surname may have originated from possible Huguenot ancestry
 
It’s of course your prerogative to dislike Corbyn’s policies, but trying to desperately label him a bigot while pretending to be silenced outraged at the Tories’ overt bigotry is shamelessly dishonest.

As you say it's been discussed to death and I think at this point nobody is going to changer their minds. @2cents and @finneh have given better answers to Corbyn and antisemitism than I could so I won't bore you with anything else.

But just on this point, I don't actually dislike many of Corbyn's policies. Many of them I agree with and thought the 2017 manifesto was largely very good. My issue with Corbyn is not based on his policies at all.

And on the point about the Tories - again we are on a very left-leaning forum where most people agree the Tories are a bunch of cnuts and the party is riddled with Islamophobia, so I'm not too sure what needs to be discussed there?
 
And on the point about the Tories - again we are on a very left-leaning forum where most people agree the Tories are a bunch of cnuts and the party is riddled with Islamophobia, so I'm not too sure what needs to be discussed there?

Ah yeah... this kind of "discussion" is really necessary and valuable:

Isn't remembrance day mostly about WW1(Armistice Day is on 11 November and is also known as Remembrance Day. It marks the day World War One ended, at 11am on the 11th day of the 11th month, in 1918)?

It's only recently been a tribute to these blokes and

1600.jpg


and people dressing up as poppies.

If they’re Jews on the ground then it’s OK.
 

That I agree he isn’t an Islamaphobe but he’s more than happy to use it to cynically pander to certain audiences. In reality he’s a multi-lingual citizen of the world with mixed heritage (Turkish/French/Russian Jewish) and has mixed race children. He actually used to advocate for Turkey joining the EU. He’s hardly the template for a political hero to the white van man.
 
As you say it's been discussed to death and I think at this point nobody is going to changer their minds. @2cents and @finneh have given better answers to Corbyn and antisemitism than I could so I won't bore you with anything else.

But just on this point, I don't actually dislike many of Corbyn's policies. Many of them I agree with and thought the 2017 manifesto was largely very good. My issue with Corbyn is not based on his policies at all.

And on the point about the Tories - again we are on a very left-leaning forum where most people agree the Tories are a bunch of cnuts and the party is riddled with Islamophobia, so I'm not too sure what needs to be discussed there?
Take your pick.

You could talk about the Russian funding and the wider implications of partnering a country who commit poisonings on UK soil,

The lack of respect and action for change from Tory MP's for British citizens who died at Grenfell

The lack of change regarding the issues around the Windrush controversy

The fact that Farage and Johnson are essentially working the same playbook as Trump and Bannon (look at the islamophobia, peddling of black myths and anti immigrant sentiment of Breitbart under the letters stewardship for clues).

Or, finally, you could ask why the Tories supported the anti semitic Hungarian government. Who were accused of violating press freedoms, undermining judicial independence, and waging an antisemitic campaign against a leading Jewish businessman.

Tories were only governing conservative party in western Europe to support Hungarian far-right in EU vote
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...arliament-vote-mep-group-europe-a8535511.html
 
I don’t disagree with any of that @Fluctuation0161. There’s certainly more you could add - and I’d hazard a guess few posters would disagree or dispute those points, which is why I don’t think they end up with pages of debate.
 
Do you think Thatcher was expressing solidarity with Pinochet when she called him a 'true friend'?

People forget how grim her love-in for him was - went well above and beyond any normal diplomacy to help and protect him despite him being an utterly vile individual.
 
Watching Angela Rayner speak. Interesting. Would be interesting to see how she would do in government, it as Labour leader.
 
I like her but the media would destroy her, probably play on her being a single mother or something.
Blimey. Obviously we're still in the Middle Ages.
 
It’s already started don’t worry


Yeah it doesn’t surprise me.

I mean I'd make the point that her achievements in spite of her academic drawbacks in her early life are a testament to her suitability compared to exclusively privately-educated Bullingdon snobs who've not worked a days honest work, but I'd be wasting my energy.

Eventually I can only hope we reach a point of diminishing returns with the public getting exhausted with the Tories and the compliant media's character assassinations, all while they're force fed more years of crippling cuts, economic instability, rising costs of living and a soon to be decimated health service.
 
Could well be her in a few months if Labour lose the election.
i think starmer and wrong daily are favourites
Raynor, Piddock and Thornberry a bit behind them but hard to imagine anybody outside those 5 at the moment getting the job ... gut feel though they keep corbyn for a little while so that they can chuck him under the EHRC bus thats about to run through the middle of momentum