Lynk
Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2009
- Messages
- 14,976
Racist.
Racist.
http://blogs.grada360.com/juanmata/en/2014/02/03/ocho-dias-muy-intensos/
God he's such a fecking nice guy it's unbelievable.
I thought it'd be "Headbutts and splash tackles, always yours, Luiz"Always putting 'hugs' after his blogs the tiny Jesse!
Hes the polar opposite of Luiz who ends his blogs with 'fcuk off and die you cnuts'.
He doesn't do much defensively, we all knew that, but every team has players like those. We're the only top team around who picks our attacking players based on their supposed defensive capabilities. Its ridiculous really and clearly a lot of our fans seem to have started believing its the way to go.I know I will get blasted for this but I'm sure I can't be the only one.
I loved signing Mata. I was over the moon when we managed to get him. Absolutely buzzing. But the last two days have had me thinking...
I mean, he really does almost next to nothing off the ball. This means that we're going to need runners around him. Van Persie isn't that. So we've essentially got 2 players that don't move about too much. Is this enough for the biggest games? I don't know. I don't think so. I think we will need to change our team drastically in the summer in order to compensate for Mata. He's a brilliant player on the ball but off the ball we can pay for this.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this.
He doesn't do much defensively, we all knew that, but every team has players like those. We're the only top team around who picks our attacking players based on their supposed defensive capabilities. Its ridiculous really and clearly a lot of our fans seem to have started believing its the way to go.
For what its worth, Mata had more tackles then anyone else in our team against Stoke, clearly making the point that he does absolutely nothing defensively false. Anyways, he always opens himself up to for a pass and is in pockets of space to receive the ball and relieve pressure. That does more then tackling someone or clearing the ball into touch IMO because it actually gives you a good out ball, and he's always in position to get it. There's a lot more to what players do off the ball then defensive work.
Do you think Reus or Lewandowski do loads of defensive work for Dortmund? What about Robben or Gotze for Bayern? Ronaldo or Benzema? Messi, Neymar or iniesta? Mata does his share of defensive work, but we that's not what we bought him for.
The logic you're using is the work rate>talent or intelligence logic which is so outdated. It's like saying you'd pick Ji Sung Park over Juan Mata in big games because he runs around more and does more defensive work. You wouldn't, nobody would.
Agreed, but even in those games, we still need players like Mata. Remember the champions league final 2011? We went for players like Park and Valencia and it failed miserably and those players in particular looked out of their depth. In the biggest games, against talented opposition, sure we want hard working players and we don't want to go all out, but we also want our talented players in the side and Mata is as talented and as good as anyone in the #10 position.Completely agree with you. The only time we need to look at work rate and defensive abilities is when we are playing a far better team like Barca or Bayern who are guaranteed to keep the ball more than us. Not when we are playing stoke or newcastle. We are supposed to dominate these teams possession wise and chances created. Right now, we need to keep getting 3 points off of these teams and Mata will surely help. It's not his job to run around winning balls. He is a playmaker who creates chances. If his attacking talent offsets his defensive vulnerability then he can easily be worth it.
I know I will get blasted for this but I'm sure I can't be the only one.
I loved signing Mata. I was over the moon when we managed to get him. Absolutely buzzing. But the last two days have had me thinking...
I mean, he really does almost next to nothing off the ball. This means that we're going to need runners around him. Van Persie isn't that. So we've essentially got 2 players that don't move about too much. Is this enough for the biggest games? I don't know. I don't think so. I think we will need to change our team drastically in the summer in order to compensate for Mata. He's a brilliant player on the ball but off the ball we can pay for this.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this.
I know I will get blasted for this but I'm sure I can't be the only one.
I loved signing Mata. I was over the moon when we managed to get him. Absolutely buzzing. But the last two days have had me thinking...
I mean, he really does almost next to nothing off the ball. This means that we're going to need runners around him. Van Persie isn't that. So we've essentially got 2 players that don't move about too much. Is this enough for the biggest games? I don't know. I don't think so. I think we will need to change our team drastically in the summer in order to compensate for Mata. He's a brilliant player on the ball but off the ball we can pay for this.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this.
RVP
Rooney Mata Januzaj
Fletcher Carrick
back 5
I know I will get blasted for this but I'm sure I can't be the only one.
I loved signing Mata. I was over the moon when we managed to get him. Absolutely buzzing. But the last two days have had me thinking...
I mean, he really does almost next to nothing off the ball. This means that we're going to need runners around him. Van Persie isn't that. So we've essentially got 2 players that don't move about too much. Is this enough for the biggest games? I don't know. I don't think so. I think we will need to change our team drastically in the summer in order to compensate for Mata. He's a brilliant player on the ball but off the ball we can pay for this.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this.
He doesn't do much defensively, we all knew that, but every team has players like those. We're the only top team around who picks our attacking players based on their supposed defensive capabilities. Its ridiculous really and clearly a lot of our fans seem to have started believing its the way to go.
I know I will get blasted for this but I'm sure I can't be the only one.
I loved signing Mata. I was over the moon when we managed to get him. Absolutely buzzing. But the last two days have had me thinking...
I mean, he really does almost next to nothing off the ball. This means that we're going to need runners around him. Van Persie isn't that. So we've essentially got 2 players that don't move about too much. Is this enough for the biggest games? I don't know. I don't think so. I think we will need to change our team drastically in the summer in order to compensate for Mata. He's a brilliant player on the ball but off the ball we can pay for this.
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this.
Not really. They still have players who don't do as much defensively, its not like mata does nothing. He's done more then any of our other attacking players other then Rooney, Valencia or young, but the latter two do nothing going forward. You have to find a balance in your team but everyone has a player, even two players that don't need to put in a shift defensively because the team is built around them going forward. Ribery and robben used to be seen as players who do nothing defensively and then they put in great shifts all around vs Barca, heynckes didn't drop them for defensive players. He just told them they needed to be fully focused defensively for those 2-3 times a season where you aren't expected to dominate the game.Incorrect. Mourinho picks front men that are solid and work hard off the ball. It's why Mata didn't feature much under him.
A lineup like this would be good for all games IMO:
RVP
Rooney Mata Januzaj
Fletcher Carrick
back 5
This pretty much. The seasons already a write off, so why doesn't he start to plan for the future already and start changing the philosophy and move the team to a better tactic? It'll take time to adapt to it but it's not like it could go worse then it is right now. We've got nothing to lose and everything to gain if we start changing the tactic and adapting the team to pretty much what most of us on here want, something that other top teams already have.That's what I would like to see us go with, with the three behind Van Persie all preferring to operate in central roles they could easily mix it up and interchange. The major width will then come from the fullbacks, particularly with Rafael and Evra both being effective at getting forward. That way it's not like we are shoving Rooney or Mata onto the wings either, so I can't see a reason as to why they would feel frustrated with that system.
As you say it highlights the need for an additional holding/defensive midfielder but that is already a very good team on paper. It will take time for the players to adapt and adjust to the new system but if Moyes looks to start integrating this now then at least we will be able to see his vision for the team going forward which will help the fans (and probably the board) be more prepared to give him time.
Pretty sure one of the main reasons, why Robben was benched for large parts of last season, was his lack of workrate in defense. He only became a starter again when Kroos got injured and since then he really works hard in defense in almost every game (not only against Barca). It's really impressive, imo. It's not only tracking back, he does his part in pressing and I've seen him run back to help his fullback several times this season. No one in the team is given freedom in terms of defensive work, it really is 11 players attacking and 11 players defending all the time.Not really. They still have players who don't do as much defensively, its not like mata does nothing. He's done more then any of our other attacking players other then Rooney, Valencia or young, but the latter two do nothing going forward. You have to find a balance in your team but everyone has a player, even two players that don't need to put in a shift defensively because the team is built around them going forward. Ribery and robben used to be seen as players who do nothing defensively and then they put in great shifts all around vs Barca, heynckes didn't drop them for defensive players. He just told them they needed to be fully focused defensively for those 2-3 times a season where you aren't expected to dominate the game.
Obviously the recent bayern team is more of a unique scenario but he was making it sound like mata does absolutely nothing defensively, which just isn't true. He works hard and does his fair share of it, just for mourinho he liked Oscar more because Oscar is one of the best in the league at pressing high up the pitch. Anyways, the point is, yes managers do like having hard working players up front but they won't sacrifice their attacking abilities for it like we do with young and Valencia.Pretty sure one of the main reasons, why Robben was benched for large parts of last season, was his lack of workrate in defense. He only became a starter again when Kroos got injured and since then he really works hard in defense in almost every game (not only against Barca). It's really impressive, imo. It's not only tracking back, he does his part in pressing and I've seen him run back to help his fullback several times this season. No one in the team is given freedom in terms of defensive work, it really is 11 players attacking and 11 players defending all the time.
Back when they used to play for Valencia.David Silva helps Juan Mata settle in Manchester:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.../manchester-uniteds-juan-mata-spotted-6673837
Sell him.
It's funny, I did the same math. I quickly dropped the thought though, as it was too painful.I've been thinking, 27mil for fellaini and 37 mil for Mata. Would 64 mil for Fabregas have been enough for Barca to let him go and would he have made a bigger impact on Moyes fortunes this season?
Would just that one signing made the difference?
The idea that Mata can't defend is a bit unfair.
Seems to have been lumbered with that reputation by Chelsea, as justification for freezing him out. Whenever I've watched him he always puts in a shift. In the game against Stock he attempted (and completed) more tackles than any other player on the pitch, for United or Stoke( 5/7). He also managed the second highest number of "ball recoveries" (9) out of everyone.
Kagawa, on the other hand...
Regardless, we haven't bought him to defend. I don't judge Evans on assists.
Attacking midfield, there's a difference.We bought him to play in midfield. Believe it or not, midfielders are judged by their ability on the ball AND their ability to win it back.
Attacking midfield, there's a difference.
Obviously, but it's not something I'm gonna openly seek Mata to be involved in. He wasn't brought in to win the ball back. No need to be so patronizing.No shit, sherlock.
The fact remains. A midfielder who is good at winning the ball back when we lose it is a valuable asset to the team, whenever we're not in possession.
Surely that's so obvious it doesn't need spelling out?
Obviously, but it's not something I'm gonna openly seek Mata to be involved in. He wasn't brought in to win the ball back. No need to be so patronizing.
Mata does a good job of closing down and applying pressure to defenders on the ball. The attacking players defensive duties are not really about winning the ball back but applying the right pressure so that the next defensive line can win the ball back. If Mata runs the right defensive lines and forces defenders on the ball towards tight situations they can help force a defender to pass the ball to a team mate that is going to be shut down quickly by our midfield. In the short amount of time he has been playing for us my impression was that he had done that well despite not yet having been with us long enough to have built up a huge amount of intuitive understanding of his team mates work and positioning.No shit, sherlock.
The fact remains. A midfielder who is good at winning the ball back when we lose it is a valuable asset to the team, whenever we're not in possession.
Surely that's so obvious it doesn't need spelling out?