Yagami
Good post resistant
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 13,875
I've just started watching Killing Eve. Had no idea he was an actor in his spare time!
Why did the manager who took his team to all three possible finals and who’s team amassed 92 points in the league, losing just three games all season win the manager of the year award, gee I dunno….
Also Liverpool weren’t the majorities pick for runners up.
That's incredibly disingenuous considering that pretty much none of his signings made a major contribution to their progress in the 2nd half of the season- Trippier missed all of it, Guimares was injured for most of it and Chris Wood is shite.And all it cost them to do it was £80m. Or six times what Burnley spent.
Why did the manager who took his team to all three possible finals and who’s team amassed 92 points in the league, losing just three games all season win the manager of the year award, gee I dunno….
Also Liverpool weren’t the majorities pick for runners up.
Trippier didn’t miss all of it. He scored two goals in successive wins that gave them a huge boost. Guimares played 17 games and scored five goals so no idea where you get the idea he was injured for most of it. That aside, the physiological boost of big signing was huge. They were just as shit before hand.That's incredibly disingenuous considering that pretty much none of his signings made a major contribution to their progress in the 2nd half of the season- Trippier missed all of it, Guimares was injured for most of it and Chris Wood is shite.
Considering that Newcastle had one of the best points returns of any PL team since he took over, he did a remarkable job.
Excellent, love how Klopp pulls him back in and tells him to grit his teeth for the camera. Not much of a perch really.![]()
It is a PL award, no? They didn’t win the title and didn’t win against any of the other top 4 sides.
All of it was hyperbole on my part- Trippier played 90 minutes 4 times: that's not a lot.Trippier didn’t miss all of it. He scored two goals in successive wins that gave them a huge boost. Guimares played 17 games and scored five goals so no idea where you get the idea he was injured for most of it. That aside, the physiological boost of big signing was huge. They were just as shit before hand.
It depends on the context. Personally I think Eddie Howe taking what looked like a cert relegated side to being comfortable mid table team was a great feat.
Also the Brentford manager worth a shout as well.
Not to mention Conte taking that spurs side over and turning their season from disaster to being 4th can't be over looked.
Liverpool finishing 2nd isn't anything special. They where 2nd favourites for the title and finished 2nd.
If all trophies are included then this should have been done once the season is over. Having the CL in your cabinet or not is a major difference
Agreed. Pundits get paid for those predictions… United above Liverpool, Liverpool in 4th. feck me.Chelsea were always wildly overrated. That was obvious at the time.
It’s presented as one but they definitely consider everything else.It is a PL award, no? They didn’t win the title and didn’t win against any of the other top 4 sides.
Their goals directly contributed a minimum of 7 points. Without them they’d have had less points than they had last season. It’s nonsense to claim their spending didn’t have a huge impact.All of it was hyperbole on my part- Trippier played 90 minutes 4 times: that's not a lot.
For Guimares, he played a grand total of 41 minutes across 5 of those 17 games you mentioned. He didn't play much.
Ok, so he doesn't have the resources of City but he has a lot of resources and (now) a very deep squad. He finished second. That's the long and short of it. The only manager who should be getting that award for finishing second is a manager that wasn't expected to finish that high.
Getting 92 points with Liverpool is much more impressive than getting 93 points with City.
The fact that he did that while potentially winning everything else is phenomenal.
Getting 92 points is never more impressive than getting 93 points.
Getting 92 points with Liverpool is much more impressive than getting 93 points with City.
60% of the time, it works EVERY time.
I have many leather bound books, and my apartment smells of rich mahogany
Thats a load of rubbish. There has to be expectation in football and realistic goals and achievements for teams with different budgets. The fact that Klopp runs a juggernaut like City so close every year is phenomenal work.
West Ham had a good league season, while United had a terrible one. To just disregard it and act like everyone is on a level playing field is ridiculous.
Still need the coaching for it to translate on the pitch. Bruce had a lot more to spend than Rafa and got the same results (which was bizarrely spun as a positive).Their goals directly contributed a minimum of 7 points. Without them they’d have had less points than they had last season. It’s nonsense to claim their spending didn’t have a huge impact.
Not sure of its reliability but transfermarkt has Benitez’s spend at £150m against Bruce at £100m. What was weird was why Benitez was adored and Bruce was hated.Still need the coaching for it to translate on the pitch. Bruce had a lot more to spend than Rafa and got the same results (which was bizarrely spun as a positive).
Correct. At the start of the season Liverpool had the realistic goal of winning the league. Therefore finishing second with 7 less points than they managed a mere 2 seasons ago was a relative failure and Klopp should not have been the Premier league manager of the season. This award is supposed to be about the Premier League.
Now if David Moyes had finished second on 92 points, he absolutely would deserve the award and then some.
, its impossible to hate the man.
Completely disagree.
In any case, why are people making out like it is some incredible feat for him to run a ‘juggernaut’ like City close for the title? Are Liverpool not a big team? Do they not have a good squad? He’s obviously a top manager who gets the best out of his players but let’s not be making out that Liverpool are some spunky underdogs.
We will agree to disagree. When you see their net spend side by side with City, Klopp is massively overachieving to get 92 points. The fact he got 99 two seasons ago doesn’t make it any less impressive.
Its simply a more impressive feat than getting a point more with a 1.2 billion pound side.
How many times did they win the PL before he arrived? How many years were they even true contenders?
I think too many in this thread have their United blinders on. The job he has done at Liverpool is phenomenal whether we like it or not. Playing it down doesn’t hurt any less.
Klopp does think of Fergie as the pope of football.Silly comment. It’s more interesting that Klopp had such respect for Sir Alex that he wants him in that photo.
As usual you get the wrong end of the stick.
Why did the manager who took his team to all three possible finals and who’s team amassed 92 points in the league, losing just three games all season win the manager of the year award, gee I dunno….
Also Liverpool weren’t the majorities pick for runners up.
So Klopp doesn't win ONE manager of the month award since last August and they give him the Manager of the season award !!!??
Unbelievable!
So Klopp doesn't win ONE manager of the month award since last August and they give him the Manager of the season award !!!??
Unbelievable!
So Klopp doesn't win ONE manager of the month award since last August and they give him the Manager of the season award !!!??
Unbelievable!
So they were able to commit daylight robbery on Barcelona with Coutinho and made some other smart moves. Klopp is not actually in charge of the transfers. He apparently wanted Draxler and not Salah.
At the start of the season Liverpool had the realistic goal of winning the league.
Therefore finishing second with 7 less points than they managed a mere 2 seasons ago was a relative failure and Klopp should not have been the Premier league manager of the season. This award is supposed to be about the Premier League.
Ok, so he doesn't have the resources of City but he has a lot of resources and (now) a very deep squad. He finished second. That's the long and short of it. The only manager who should be getting that award for finishing second is a manager that wasn't expected to finish that high.
So Klopp doesn't win ONE manager of the month award since last August and they give him the Manager of the season award !!!??
Unbelievable!
Had no idea the PL had finals.
These, and pretty much every, footballing awards are shit.
Manager of the season for failing to win the league, failing to get a single win against any top 4 opposition, yup totally deserved.
Not sure how it is so hard to wrap your head around. Think of it as a manager league table; if he finished second every month, he would have the highest average of all managers come the end of the season.
I feel sick agreeing with merson.
But when you're right you're right.