Sammyjunn
New Member
Just read a stat that Ozil and Cazorla have created as much chances as our entire team. Ozil with 47 I read earlier, so Cazorla with 34. Philosophy.
He is very stubborn and believes in his philosophy more than anything else. I'm convinced he thinks the reason we're not doing too well is not because we play poorly per so but because we still have problems replicating his philosophy properly.It's appalling that after the Palace game he still said that the only reason we didn't create more was because we didn't have enough of the ball. That's blind stupidity right there.
It's appalling that after the Palace game he still said that the only reason we didn't create more was because we didn't have enough of the ball. That's blind stupidity right there.
Did he say that? I haven't seen any quotes along those lines.
"We did not keep the ball. That's a very important factor and because of that we didn't create too many chances.
Did he say that? I haven't seen any quotes along those lines.
Just read a stat that Ozil and Cazorla have created as much chances as our entire team. Ozil with 47 I read earlier, so Cazorla with 34. Philosophy.
FFS...
To be fair we didn't keep the ball as well as usual. Statistically we were below our average possession and pass success rate. 53% possession isn't good enough if you are banking on tiring out the opponent towards the end of the game. Herrera and Schneiderlin played stupid passes more than once and they weren't the only ones with lapses. It still doesn't explain why there isn't more tempo to our passing game.
Surely the penny has dropped by now that we're not tiring anyone out, no matter how much possession we have? Watch the way teams play against us. As soon as they loss the ball they sit deep and let us pass it around in front of them. The opposition players are all packed into a small area of the pitch and cover very little ground.
If he thinks that he's right.He is very stubborn and believes in his philosophy more than anything else. I'm convinced he thinks the reason we're not doing too well is not because we play poorly per so but because we still have problems replicating his philosophy properly.
Surely the penny has dropped by now that we're not tiring anyone out, no matter how much possession we have? Watch the way teams play against us. As soon as they loss the ball they sit deep and let us pass it around in front of them. The opposition players are all packed into a small area of the pitch and cover very little ground.
I think that works and has possibly worked for him in the past, it justs doesnt work in English football. He's trying to impose his style on the league rather than adapting it to fit the league.You've got me wrong. I was doing my best van Gaal impression and trying to outline his reasoning for saying something like that. He did say recently iirc that the purpose of possession football is control and tiring out your opponent. It seems the penny hasn't dropped with him that possession without more tempo won't tire out the opponent. Regardless if it works or not, we didn't keep the ball well enough at the weekend and our passing was sloppy. We didn't have the control he wants us to have.
I think that works and has possibly worked for him in the past, it justs doesnt work in English football. He's trying to impose his style on the league rather than adapting it to fit the league.
They are some aspects of his philosophy that are an improvement for us in the premier league, and will benefit us, such as ball retention. But the zombie movement of our forward line is one that wont, especially for a league renowned for pace and power. Its something he has totally neglected and its costing us.
In essence, I agree. They are elements of this type of football that work. Its just that Van Gaal's own version of possession football is far too rigid, and he has failed to adapt it especially to the kind of players that he has.Once Guardiola will be a manager in this league I think you'll see that it does work and he'll impose his style on the league. It has also worked for van Gaal in quite a few games. We've probably scored more goals in the second half of games than we did in the first. Still doesn't change the fact that we create too little and he wants our players to be overly efficient.
It'll be fine. His football is more in tune with Cruyff, as opposed to van Gaal. United would be more attacking with him at the helm despite his desire to dominate possession. Van Gaal's at times seems like possession and passing for the sake of it without enough penetration.In essence, I agree. They are elements of this type of football that work. Its just that Van Gaal's own version of possession football is far too rigid, and he has failed to adapt it especially to the kind of players that he has.
Do you think Guardiola would work for us? He has his own quirks that scare me a bit.
It's not, it can and should be an extra advantage. You move the ball around quickly and the defending team is running after ball, which generally is faster than a player, so spaces will open up. It's also more tiring than passin the ball, so those spaces will open up more easily and get bigger as the match progresses. But you have to stretch a defense with quick passing and movement.You've got me wrong. I was doing my best van Gaal impression and trying to outline his reasoning for saying something like that. He did say recently iirc that the purpose of possession football is control and tiring out your opponent. It seems the penny hasn't dropped with him that possession without more tempo won't tire out the opponent. Regardless if it works or not, we didn't keep the ball well enough at the weekend and our passing was sloppy(Edit: by his standards). We didn't have the control he wants us to have.
FFS...
In essence, I agree. They are elements of this type of football that work. Its just that Van Gaal's own version of possession football is far too rigid, and he has failed to adapt it especially to the kind of players that he has.
Do you think Guardiola would work for us? He has his own quirks that scare me a bit.
It's not, it can and should be an extra advantage. You move the ball around quickly and the defending team is running after ball, which generally is faster than a player, so spaces will open up. It's also more tiring than passin the ball, so those spaces will open up more easily and get bigger as the match progresses. But you have to stretch a defense with quick passing and movement.
No, Van Gaal has always been more attacking than Cruijff, only slightly, but significantly. Same for Guardiola, the difference is that Guardiola got his attacking patterns working, and Van Gaal didn't yet. But whe he does, and they get in the final third with some sense of urgency and purpose, they are allowed to take on defenders more with risking possesion.It'll be fine. His football is more in tune with Cruyff, as opposed to van Gaal. United would be more attacking with him at the helm despite his desire to dominate possession. Van Gaal's at times seems like possession and passing for the sake of it without enough penetration.
Don't know what he said exactly and in what context, but I don't agree and with his football from the past in mind, I don't think this part is the whole story why he plays possession football.Not my words, his.
I'd love that..Ive seen Barca and Spain play possession football that wasn't as toothless as we play, so I know it can be done. Hell, Spain even did it without a striker winning a cup final 4-0.It'll be fine. His football is more in tune with Cruyff, as opposed to van Gaal. United would be more attacking with him at the helm despite his desire to dominate possession. Van Gaal's at times seems like possession and passing for the sake of it without enough penetration.
When does his contract end? This year?Mate of mine, who's supporting Munich, is convinced he'll join us. I think he's our best option, if he doesn't renew his contract.
Not my words, his.
End of this current season.When does his contract end? This year?
In essence, I agree. They are elements of this type of football that work. Its just that Van Gaal's own version of possession football is far too rigid, and he has failed to adapt it especially to the kind of players that he has.
Do you think Guardiola would work for us? He has his own quirks that scare me a bit.
Whenever someone lets their contract renewal drag this late, it usually ends up with them not resigning.End of this current season.
I agree, I think he has done a decent job in terms of making us controlling the possession better. We are no longer run through in midfield. An example I can give is when we face City. I remember that even when we played decently against them pre-LVG, they still battered us in midfield. Think of the game of the RVP game at the Etihad in 2012/2013..they dominated our midfield to come back from 2-0 down.I like LVG's version as the first step of a rebuilding because that version teaches the fundamentals of possession football. Like almost everyone I'm a bit fed up with it now, but I really think that it's a uselful step, not an obligatory step but a useful one.
Was speaking to my dutch mate last night, and he raised the point LVG historically does play attacking football, we forget that all too often. Ajax, Barca, Bayern, Az, they were all attacking teams. What LVG does do is adapt and try to build a team to meet what is required. Holland team basically went back to possession football and a 3-5-2 almost a 5 at the back, but they got a long way in the world cup and it worked. But historically he is building what he thinks he needs.
Last year we were bad but learning possession, this year we have got possession now learning creativity amongst possession...I do believe he is building something here. I do also agree its boring to watch at times and very frustrating, but as Scholes said he is positioning us and without playing well we are still competing.