Treble
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,550
If steel were that important in football, Barca wouldn't have won a shitload of tropheys. Mobility and positioning are much more important than steel.
So those thinking that Fellaini might not actually provide the "steel" people claimed he would want him and Moyes to fail? Where does that logic come from?
If steel were that important in football, Barca wouldn't have won a shitload of tropheys. Mobility and positioning are much more important than steel.
It's your logic. I never said anything about people wanting Fellaini (or Moyes) to fail. I'm talking about the petulance and the premature doom mongering that has been very prevalent round here after the City match.
Expressing an opinion that Fellaini is not what we need, that we don't need steel or that Fellaini actually doesn't bring that much steel - all this is fine by me. It's the nature of some of the outbursts I react to. Surely you can see the difference between voicing a concern and crying like a school girl - it's this I'm talking about, not people actively wanting us to fail: I don't believe in that sort of thing any more than you do.
I quoted TN on Ramshock's post accusing him of wanting Moyes and Fellaini to fail which is beyond stupid logic.
I didn't quote you or your reaction to anything, you simply waded in on the convo.
If steel were that important in football, Barca wouldn't have won a shitload of tropheys. Mobility and positioning are much more important than steel.
If steel were that important in football, Barca wouldn't have won a shitload of tropheys. Mobility and positioning are much more important than steel.
What BS. Barca during their superb cycle were one of the best at winning the ball back.
That had nothing to do with Steel in their midfield mate.
Er...what do you define as "steel" then.
Fellaini is better than what United currently have in that midfield, bar Carrick. That's not really up for debate.
The issue is that if you have a poor midfield, this isn't the path to go down. You don't improve a midfield that isn't up to scratch by signing someone who ultimately you would only ever want as a squad player.
If you want to draw wider conclusions, you could argue as well that the biggest worry with the Fellaini signing is that it might be a reflection on the manager. Safety first, stick to what you know. Strength and height over technical proficiency. Maybe that's pushing it.
Er...what do you define as "steel" then.
He looked rubbish, did nothing at all, no urgency whatsoever, depressing to buy this for £28m.
He was a token buy so the club could say it had done something at least in the window, one that if we'd really wanted we'd have snapped up for the release clause and had him settle in over the pre-season. It isn't his fault, but we clearly need more than Fellaini, and he shouldn't be in our strongest starting XI.
I thought he'd be a good signing but clearly I was wrong. He's shite
The problem is that he's most effective playing off the striker. However, he's just good enough there to justify inclusion at the expense of Rooney or Kagawa. Therefore, it was a misguided buy.Yeah, I hold my hands up too, I think I got this one very wrong.
He looks like absolute shite.
Yeah, I hold my hands up too, I think I got this one very wrong.
He looks like absolute shite.
What did ye actually expect from Fellaini? He'll be decent once he settles in, but he was never going to be more than that. Ye've only yourselves to blame if you expected him to massively improve our team, it's an unfair expectation to place on him too.