Mesut Özil

I think its his attitude. Ive been quite critical of him because players like that irritate me on the field. Yes they can look great for one game, but then others, especially big ones they look like they dont care and cant play at all. The opposite of players like Viera, Drogba, Henry,Vidic,Lampard,Gerrard, Rooney etc - Big game players.
yeah i know what you mean but seems like ozil's neutral body language used against him. he covers a lot of ground in each game but it may not look like just based on his body language or how he moves around the pitch. more graceful than rugged. he puts himself about but he hasn't developed to where he consistently performs in big games. seems to do better when the team are in full flow. never saw him as a player to grab game by scruff of the neck.
 
I know. It's baffling - it's confirmed he's out for a few weeks at least.

Wenger's too proud to take a player off at half time. He never does it, really.

My main gripe with all of this is how whenever Ozil plays well, it is completely ignored by the media. Saturday being a perfect example. When he does what everyone else in the team does, he gets absolutely slaughtered for it. You'd never see this article written about Giroud.

Equally, no-one's talking about how monumentally awful Gotze was tonight. £32M down the drain? Of course not.

There's just so much unnecessary drama with Ozil and I think there's really a personal, unpleasant vendetta behind it all.

I was actually. In the match thread, I just said that I'd never seen him do anything really considering the hype.
 
Ozil shouldn't change his game for the low IQ brigade.

He shouldn't have to cover his socks with mud or look breathless down a camera lens to please the press.
 
It's ridiculous the stick he gets on here. It wasn't too long ago that this forum was constantly pointing out the vendetta about De Gea or talking about how overrated Scott Parker was just because he ran around a lot. Yet now they are more than happy to be a part of the same nonsense against Ozil. I think a lot of it comes down to jealousy and Man Utd fans wanting Ozil to be a flop because it justifies their not signing him.
 
I mean he's basically Berbatov with shit hair, isn't he guys?
 
And you didn't reply when I asked how many games you've watched of him.

I don't keep track of precise numbers of football matches I've seen, sorry. But enough to have the opinion that he isn't yet deserving of the hype he gets.
 
Ashton is a crap journalist anyway, and a really poor writer on top of it. We're hardly taking his opinion seriously?

On a side note, it really irritates me when supposedly serious football journalists use phrases like "face like a slapped backside" to describe a player. Even if I agreed with Ashton I'd still think he writes like a moron.
 
It's ridiculous the stick he gets on here. It wasn't too long ago that this forum was constantly pointing out the vendetta about De Gea or talking about how overrated Scott Parker was just because he ran around a lot. Yet now they are more than happy to be a part of the same nonsense against Ozil. I think a lot of it comes down to jealousy and Man Utd fans wanting Ozil to be a flop because it justifies their not signing him.
You know what Ozil's problem is Eboue?
 
Never mind 'tactics' or 'talent' - British steel is needed:

Andy Townsend said:
"Oi fink Arrsunul could do wiv more pashun...somewun like Toeknee Adums or Hulk Hogan or sumfing..."
 
I still think he's a top player. It's just that I don't think he's helped by having Giroud as the forward he's meant to supply.

Also losing Ramsey is a big blow as I thought he got the best out of Ozil earlier in the season.

Ultimately though, I think the guys that criticized the signing as a "luxury" have been proven right. Arsenal needed a really top class striker in the summer and IMO Ozil top class forwards to play with if he's to be effective.
 
That's the world of sports journalism right there.

Years of an Orwellian removal of freedom of speech for journalists has caused this. Press conferences are now just processions where managers turn up with their press officers and say absolutely nothing of interest. Players give interviews under strict conditions from their clubs. People gasp in awe when Tim Sherwood actually expresses a legitimate opinion. Sports journalists worth their salt have given up the game when it comes to football.

The result is that only the dregs remain. The scorpions who thrive on the post-apocalyptic journalism dystopia. That's why Neil Ashton writes for the Daily Mail and isn't being feature on Benefits Street.
 
I mean he's basically Berbatov with shit hair, isn't he guys?

I didn't even watch the game but Ozil's was the worst performance I've never seen.
What a waste of Sainsburys school vouchers.
 
That's the world of sports journalism right there.

Years of an Orwellian removal of freedom of speech for journalists has caused this. Press conferences are now just processions where managers turn up with their press officers and say absolutely nothing of interest. Players give interviews under strict conditions from their clubs. People gasp in awe when Tim Sherwood actually expresses a legitimate opinion. Sports journalists worth their salt have given up the game when it comes to football.

The result is that only the dregs remain. The scorpions who thrive on the apocalyptic journalism dystopia. That's why Neil Ashton writes for the Daily Mail and isn't being feature on Benefits Street.

:lol:
 
That's the world of sports journalism right there.

Years of an Orwellian removal of freedom of speech for journalists has caused this. Press conferences are now just processions where managers turn up with their press officers and say absolutely nothing of interest. Players give interviews under strict conditions from their clubs. People gasp in awe when Tim Sherwood actually expresses a legitimate opinion. Sports journalists worth their salt have given up the game when it comes to football.

The result is that only the dregs remain. The scorpions who thrive on the post-apocalyptic journalism dystopia. That's why Neil Ashton writes for the Daily Mail and isn't being feature on Benefits Street.

You know how to fix that in the short term?
 
Orson Welles said:
Years of an Orwellian removal of freedom of speech for journalists has caused this. Press conferences are now just processions where managers turn up with their press officers and say absolutely nothing of interest. Players give interviews under strict conditions from their clubs. People gasp in awe when Tim Sherwood actually expresses a legitimate opinion. Sports journalists worth their salt have given up the game when it comes to football.

The result is that only the dregs remain. The scorpions who thrive on the post-apocalyptic journalism dystopia. That's why Neil Ashton writes for the Daily Mail and isn't being feature on Benefits Street.

Alastair said:
We know now that in the early years of the twentieth century this world was being watched closely by intelligences greater than man's and yet as mortal as his own. We know now that as human beings busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinized and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinize the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacence people went to and fro over the earth about their little affairs, serene in the assurance of their dominion over this small spinning fragment of solar driftwood which by chance or design man has inherited out of the dark mystery of Time and Space. Yet across an immense ethereal gulf, minds that to our minds as ours are to the beasts in the jungle, intellects vast, cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes and slowly and surely drew their plans against us. In the thirty-ninth year of the twentieth century came the great disillusionment.

....
 
I know. It's baffling - it's confirmed he's out for a few weeks at least.

Wenger's too proud to take a player off at half time. He never does it, really.

My main gripe with all of this is how whenever Ozil plays well, it is completely ignored by the media. Saturday being a perfect example. When he does what everyone else in the team does, he gets absolutely slaughtered for it. You'd never see this article written about Giroud.

Equally, no-one's talking about how monumentally awful Gotze was tonight. £32M down the drain? Of course not.

There's just so much unnecessary drama with Ozil and I think there's really a personal, unpleasant vendetta behind it all.

None of the others cost £40m quid did they.

As for Gotze - it was €32m not £32m and he also has 9 goals and 6 assists in 18 starts for Bayern compared to 5 and 10 in 32 for Arsenal. Gotze's also 21

Ozil goes missing in big games. Simple as that. He struggles to impose himself on any game his team isn't controlling. He was the same at Madrid only it was less obvious.

There is one way for him to keep all those evil people pursuing an agenda off his back though.
 
Last edited:
:lol:

Do you want the password to my account? You do it better than me.

:lol:

BTW mate, was the first sentence in your previous post meant seriously?
 
None of the others cost £40m quid did they.

As for Gotze - it was €32m not £32m and he also has 9 goals and 6 assists in 18 starts for Bayern compared to 5 and 10 in 32 for Arsenal. Gotze's also 19.

Ozil goes missing in big games. Simple as that. He struggles to impose himself on any game his team isn't controlling. He was the same at Madrid only it was less obvious.

There is one way for him to keep all those evil people pursuing an agenda off his back though.

It's the complete refusal to accept other factors though that go with it.

Firstly, it is clear that there have been some big games in which Ozil has not excelled. There's no denying this.

The obligation to control the game really isn't with Ozil. It's not with someone like Giroud either. These are players that rely on the game being controlled further back in order to let them do their thing. The reality is that we've struggled as a team to control big games this season. That's not really Ozil's fault.

Couple that in with the fact that there's been very little pace for him to work with, few runners, and that he's played almost all our games this season, it's inevitable that there will be games he will struggle in - this is most noticeable in big games.

He's not blameless. I wouldn't give him 10/10 for the season. I would give him 7/10 though. The media would give him 1/10. That's the difference here.
 
He is no use in those games where you sit back and wait for the counter, defensively he just can't contribute enough to these games. He is good if you have the majority in possession and dominate a game but not if you have to grind out a result against a better opposition he should never start those games.
 
:lol:

BTW mate, was the first sentence in your previous post meant seriously?

Well, I think the creation of these press officer type roles at big football clubs has really inhibited good journalism in the field(as well as other things, of course). Everything is so monitored now. Obviously, we can all understand why, but I do think it means that the dream job of being a great sports journalist who asks tough questions of players and managers no longer exists. So yes, I was exaggerating a tad, but there's a point in there somewhere.
 
Well, I think the creation of these press officer type roles at big football clubs has really inhibited good journalism in the field(as well as other things, of course). Everything is so monitored now. Obviously, we can all understand why, but I do think it means that the dream job of being a great sports journalist who asks tough questions of players and managers no longer exists. So yes, I was exaggerating a tad, but there's a point in there somewhere.

I find it ridiculous that these officers control the narrative, or even attempt to. It's demeaning to one and all.