Losing the league twice with over 90 points is basically winning it compared to any other manager besides pep.
No other manager has been close to reaching 92 or 97 points, those are wonderful campaigns despite not winning.
Losing the league twice with over 90 points is basically winning it compared to any other manager besides pep.
No other manager has been close to reaching 92 or 97 points, those are wonderful campaigns despite not winning.
What asterisk, they won by ten million points.Do you want a trophy for that? All you have is a covid asterisk title for that past 35 years.
That’s just petty Utd fans trying to console ourselves, they were like 20 points ahead before the lockdown.Do you want a trophy for that? All you have is a covid asterisk title for that past 35 years.
I might be wrong but did the BBC not show a graphic during the game that the league winners recently have all generally out performed their xG
Yes.
![]()
Okay, that was incredible mental fortitude to recover from repeatedly finishing a close 2nd to finally win a title and the CL. It was all Klopp. I can't think of another manager that would've been able to maintain focus like this after this many setbacks. I mean, look at Arteta. One close 2nd and he looks unable to repeat the performance.
But also, just one league title and a CL in your supposed glory period!![]()
Under a bit of pressure now surely.
You could say the same about us under our various failed managers, except we actually won stuff.
Well to be fair they should never have finished 8th twice to begin with and then to make it even more worse bottled 4th spot to Spurs. Till now he has 6 good months in his bank. If arsenal somehow bottles 4th spot this season, surely his whole stint would be considered a farce
I'm not sure, you may be right, but I still think it's a weird thing to call out.I might be wrong but did the BBC not show a graphic during the game that the league winners recently have all generally out performed their xG
Which again makes it even more daft they spent 160m on Rice and Havertz, if that was his goal - unless he's only just realised itBecause league winners invariably have at least one excellent goalscorer up front and excellent goalscorers tend to outperform xG.
Because league winners invariably have at least one excellent goalscorer up front and excellent goalscorers tend to outperform xG.
So what he’s saying might be true (if I interpreted the graphic correctly, I didn’t have sound on at the time), it’s just likely we don’t have a player that can help you achieve that?
I agree with his sentiment but Omari will get nowhere at Chelsea either tbh.
And neither have Arsenal, they had a period of 6 months where they looked really good but fell off massively in the final 3rd of the season once the World Cup was over.None of our managers post Fergie have had us looking like actual title challengers. And Arteta does have an FA Cup to his name as well. Anyway, I'm not here to sing his praises - my main point was that they have clearly not been further away each year during his reign. This is the first season where they have clearly regressed.
Yes, finishing 8th twice in a row, and then missing out on top four was really bad. Those were good windows to get rid of him, but then he followed it up with a pretty strong season last year. But yes, if they finish outside the top four this year, I'd say it would be good to find another manager. The player material is a lot better than that, and with a lot of young players in the squad Arsenal will have a window to challenge again if they can improve on their weak areas.
And neither have Arsenal, they had a period of 6 months where they looked really good but fell off massively in the final 3rd of the season once the World Cup was over.
Just like Arsenal, there’s always been a feeling we’d kick on ‘next season’, even as late as this summer. People on here were talking about us only being Harry Kane away from winning the league, pundits were saying the same thing.
Much like us, Arsenal have never really been in with a shout if winning the league and most of these takes people have are based in the moment of recent form and the hope that teams can somehow improve another 25% next season after spending over £100m.
They never had or looked like they had what it takes to win the league and City being poorer than usual doesn’t mean Arsenal were world class all of a sudden. If City have their usual kind of season Arsenal aren’t even in with a shout of being in that position with 6 games to go. Liverpool have had better sides in recent years.You don't even think Arsenal were title challengers last season? The team that was 1st in the league with 6 games to go, and still within two points of 1st with 3 games to go. That's just delusional.
Except it's not, if you outperform you're xG, you're scoring chances you shouldn't usually score. To be clinical, you just need to be performing to your xG. Outperforming it is just unsustainable.
The way the calendar was last year, the world cup in the middle, the fact City had games in hand for a long time and the 2 teams hadn't played each other til the second part of the season... This all makes the "Arsenal top of the table for X amount of weeks" a bit irrelevant.You don't even think Arsenal were title challengers last season? The team that was 1st in the league with 6 games to go, and still within two points of 1st with 3 games to go. That's just delusional.
Exactly - do more with less.They can do it, just need to give 110%
The way the calendar was last year, the world cup in the middle, the fact City had games in hand for a long time and the 2 teams hadn't played each other til the second part of the season... This all makes the "Arsenal top of the table for X amount of weeks" a bit irrelevant.
Why not? If he's good enough, he'll at the very least get a chance. He obviously has to show something at Ipswich, that's the whole point of the loan. In the few youth games I watched him in, I didn't see anything particularly special or outstanding about him (it seems like he hasn't really cracked Ipswich's starting lineup yet) so maybe his calling is another loan then sold or maybe he'll surprise me and show a level I'm yet to see from him.
The point I was making re the calendar is that it was particularly distorted and it wasn't possible to analyse match weeks in the same way as other seasonsHe didn’t mention weeks. Arsenal had 74 points after 31 games while City had 73 after 31 games.
Fact is Arsenal were top with 7 games to go so saying Arsenal never looked like winning the league sounds delusional.
So is saying Arsenal were good only for half a season. Arsenals pts average between games 19-29 was 2.2 which gives you 84 pts over a season. Teams have won the title in the past with that form.
They never had or looked like they had what it takes to win the league and City being poorer than usual doesn’t mean Arsenal were world class all of a sudden. If City have their usual kind of season Arsenal aren’t even in with a shout of being in that position with 6 games to go. Liverpool have had better sides in recent years.
I think he's a good manager, just not S tier/A tier that a club needs to win major titles.Doubt Arteta's job is under pressure just yet. He has brought us back into CL and in title races for the first time in almost a decade. We were in freefall when he arrived and he steadied the ship. There are obviously issues he needs to sort (getting a striker is top priority ATM) and we've hit a brick wall in the last 1-2 weeks. Our soft centre also seems to have resurfaced, ATM we concede and lose our heads. Have to sort it out, but not hitting panic mode yet.
Arsenals total points would have won the league twice in the last 23 years. Safe to say, many things have to go wrong for their rivals for them to have won the league. I will never understand this insane clamour to be the new Arsenal or celebrate what this Arsenal have ‘achieved’ in recent years. They’re miles off a title winning team and they don’t have the right manager to win a title anyway.Well, you beat what's in front of you. Sometimes you can win the league with 85 points, other times it's 95 or more. Last year was closer to the former, and it looks like it could be similar this year. There was a couple of times in the last part of the season, where Arsenal got late comeback wins (Bournemouth and Villa if I remember right), where I thought those could be huge points towards the end. I haven't called Arsenal of last year "world class", and they were clearly not as good as the Liverpool sides that have finished 2nd with 90+ points. They still challenged for the title, though.
Arsenals total points would have won the league twice in the last 23 years. Safe to say, many things have to go wrong for their rivals for them to have won the league. I will never understand this insane clamour to be the new Arsenal or celebrate what this Arsenal have ‘achieved’ in recent years. They’re miles off a title winning team and they don’t have the right manager to win a title anyway.
Spent £70M on GK when they already had Emi Martinez.
If our current keepers aren't good enough, Martinez isn't either.
Yeh I agree, not the level Pep or Klopp are at. But he still very young and inexperienced compared to most managers. He's been the perfect manager for us at this time. He came in when we were a mid-table side and now has us competing at the highest level again. Whether or not this is his ceiling or we need to get someone more elite in remains to be seen. But I think the over-reaction from people (Arsenal fans in particular on social media) after this poor run of form is over the top.I think he's a good manager, just not S tier/A tier that a club needs to win major titles.
Spent £70M on GK when they already had Emi Martinez.
Spent £70M on GK when they already had Emi Martinez.
Do you want a trophy for that? All you have is a covid asterisk title for that past 35 years.
Losing the league twice with over 90 points is basically winning it compared to any other manager besides pep.
No other manager has been close to reaching 92 or 97 points, those are wonderful campaigns despite not winning.