North Korea

We have the best disasters. Tremendous disasters. Everybody talks about them. Tremendous. All everyone talks about. And we keep 'em coming folks. You won't believe the tremendous disasters we're working on.
 
I thought NK had denuclesrised? We told people eager to praise Trump that this was going to happen. I'm sure Chairman Kim thanks him for the photoshoot.
 
I thought NK had denuclesrised? We told people eager to praise Trump that this was going to happen. I'm sure Chairman Kim thanks him for the photoshoot.


I know you're just going for a "i told you so" post but the two events are not mutually exclusive at all, the US can be praised for the efforts even if there's setbacks.

The North and South have increased their ties and every step from the precipice is a small victory
 
I know you're just going for a "i told you so" post but the two events are not mutually exclusive at all, the US can be praised for the efforts even if there's setbacks.

The North and South have increased their ties and every step from the precipice is a small victory

A reminder (with Added Recent Promise) of all the times NK promised to denuclearise.

What: Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons
When: December 12, 1985

What: Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
When: January 20, 1992

What: Agreed Framework
When: October 21, 1994

What: Agreed Framework
When: October 21, 1994

What: Six-Party Talks (Again)
When: October 3, 2007

What: Six-Party Talks (Again)
When: October 3, 2007

What: Trump Summit
When: June 12, 2018

It’s also not enough to “praise effort”. Trump’s statecraft was poor, and arguably has weakened the US position.
 
A reminder (with Added Recent Promise) of all the times NK promised to denuclearise.

What: Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons
When: December 12, 1985

What: Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
When: January 20, 1992

What: Agreed Framework
When: October 21, 1994

What: Agreed Framework
When: October 21, 1994

What: Six-Party Talks (Again)
When: October 3, 2007

What: Six-Party Talks (Again)
When: October 3, 2007

What: Trump Summit
When: June 12, 2018

You need to add a point as it's not self-evident.
I'm well aware of how long it's been pushed down the line by the North Koreans but an immediate resolution is not the only way the US can earn praise. Any progress whether that's substantial denuclearization or a reduction in the hate filled culture and closer alignment with South Korea is beneficial.

No ones hosting a parade because Trump solved Korea. There has only ever been very low and caveated praise towards the administration in this thread but for obvious reasons some can't accept even that.
 
You need to add a point as it's not self-evident.
I'm well aware of how long it's been pushed down the line by the North Koreans but an immediate resolution is not the only way the US can earn praise. Any progress whether that's substantial denuclearization or a reduction in the hate filled culture and closer alignment with South Korea is beneficial.

No ones hosting a parade because Trump solved Korea. There has only ever been very low and caveated praise towards the administration in this thread but for obvious reasons some can't accept even that.

My point was, “It’s also not enough to “praise effort”. Trump’s statecraft was poor, and arguably has weakened the US position.“

This development from NK was all too predictable. Arguably Trump’s naivety is buying time they need to fix their facilities.
 
My point was, “It’s also not enough to “praise effort”. Trump’s statecraft was poor, and arguably has weakened the US position.“

This development from NK was all too predictable. Arguably Trump’s naivety is buying time they need to fix their facilities.

Well your stance is your stance i personally don't expect any administration to come in and swiftly strong arm NK i into defeat, i think it's an unreasonable expectation. You're not going to sanction their nuclear programme away or rid it through threats and the wait and see if they get overthrown approach hasn't worked for decades.

War isn't an option and keeping them perpetually in the dog house leaves little room for positive efforts with the South. They need to be given the opportunity to work towards the carrot or the stick in a way that isn't just give up your nukes now or else. The perception of defeat isn't acceptable to Kim.
 
Second summit ends with no deal
Is anyone surprised? I remember clashing with people willing to give him the benefit of the doubt before this process.
Leaders don't meet up less they have a framework to negotiate from. Both sides can't even negotiate on what denuclearisation means, nevermind agreeing to a deal.
 
DT: As master of this world, I order you to give up your nuclear arms

KJU: No, I refuse to.

DT: Let me bring out my brilliant negotiation skills

KJU: No thanks

DT: Cheers, then let us do some photo-ops

KJU: Works with me
 
I still can't believe anyone expected Kim to give up his nuclear weapons, whether senior level diplomat, president, or complete nobody. To be fair most of the nobodies know he won't anyway.
So in the end, it was all for show as a distraction. And the net effect being a boost for a mad regime further legitimized by a photo-op and the exposure it desperately wants.

Well, two mad regimes really...
 
trump's strategy of giving in doesnt seem to be working. i think he needs to try negging kim and using reverse psychology.

He should also turn up to the next meeting wearing a lairy hat with a feather in it.
 
In fairness, for all of the things you can criticise him for, I personally don't think he did much wrong here.

He tried something different and it failed. What has he lost? Not much really and the potential upside was huge.

He could have tried what every US president has done for decades and it almost certainly would have had exactly the same outcome. Might as well try something different and see if anything comes from it. His attempt hasn't harmed the US either.
 


This doesn't even begin to scratch the surface.

The regime earns money by whatever means necessary, including:
  • renting out properties;
  • sending workers abroad with and without visas;
  • setting up companies abroad to circumvent sanctions, and;
  • engaging in criminality.
This is one tax bill I doubt the Germans will ever recoup.
 
Last edited:
In reality China has no more influence over North Korea’s behaviour than South Korea, Russia or the United States.

China imposing sanctions on North Korea would impact the former and be a catastrophe for the latter.

China’s economic interests include:
  • Chinese companies have interests in North Korea's mineral resources (Coal, Copper, Iron Ore) in the form of concessions and mineral rights.
  • North Korea provides access to the sea for the landlocked provinces in NE China. Sonbong port, near Rason, is closer than Dandong.
  • Small businesses avail of North Korea's cheap labour through outsourcing.
And North Korea’s trade with China exceeds their trade with all other countries combined. Even Pyongyang worries about North Korea's over reliance on China.

The implications of China imposing sanctions on North Korea is the equivalent of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.