You must be really young cause you don't seem to remember those days too well. They finished 3rd not fourth. They reached the semi finals of the CL where they lost to us(the eventual winners) in a scrap two legs separated only by a paul scholes screamer. Why did they finish 3rd? Rijkaard is the answer. That squad was great, the coaching was terrible. Eto'o spent a lot of the season injured and he along with messi were basically the attack as dinho and deco were on the wane. Henry, messi, xavi, iniesta, yaya, eto'o, puyol and you don't think that squad had amazing players? Deary me.
Did I say he should take a small job? why are you making arguments for me that I haven't made? Do you think coaching an english giant or an italian giant is a small job? What does everton have to do with anything?
Nope, inter was dire in the CL, nothing close to a great side. The italian league was dead(still hasn't fully recovered) and they had some of those titles because of the italian scandal. The money you talk about wasn't really spent too much on the team. Ibra wasn't there in the CL run because Pep took him. In fact we beat them in mou's first season. Mou's first season at inter wasn't much of an accomplishment as inter were basically in their own world in serie cause of the crisis the other teams had, but the second one is the one that really hits the point home of how good he is. Pray tell what was so lucky about that CL win as I'm really intrigued...they played something like 60 mins iirc with 10 men at the camp nou and still managed a victory. Disgusting football doesn't change scoreline at the end of matches. This is sport and ultimately the aim is to win, and they did that.
For someone as incompetent as Moyes? Of course its rocket science. For managers worth their salt it isn't all that difficult really(look at how easy tito won the title at barca after pep left). All united fans knew our team despite having won the title had issue and all he did was bring in fellaini and implement some stone age tactics. That united team walked the title but to suggest it was some type of all time great side like the bayern side pep inherited would be close to blasphemy. We played with 1 midfielder the whole season ffs.
We're talking top level sports here so barca B stuff gets discounted. What he did at barca was very impressive, could he do it again is the question. He's won 2 major trophies and took the defending CL finalists to an embarrassing 5-1 agg defeat to madrid in the semis. Last season really wasn't much of an accomplishment considering what he inherited.
Third or fourth, it doesn't matter - the fact is that they finished way below the capabilities of those great players. I never said they didn't have amazing players, I said that those players you listed never showed their true potential before Guardiola came in and you can't deny that. Also, Rijkaard is the answer? The guy won everything with Barcelona including the CL. He wasn't the best manager, but he was certainly good. Guardiola made really drastic changes to that Barcelona side that made them the beast that they became. He changed their system into a more pressing tiki-taka than ever before. If you think that the Barcelona side before Pep would have been the same amazing team it was without him, then you're sorely mistaken.
So I don't understand? What do you mean? What is the difference between taking Juventus and taking Bayern? Nothing. He would still dominate the league and win the Copa Italia and the only front that would be a challenge will be the CL.
First, as I said, Mourinho didn't have any challenge on the domestic front. He had the money, the other teams had their financial problems so it wasn't any challenge to win the Italian league or the Copa Italia with them. The CL? The CL win came from quite a bit of luck. They were dominated in most of their matches, but managed to scrape through - typical Jose Mourinho side.
The resident Barca fans here say an entirely different story - that the title won by Tito was boosted a great deal by Messi's amazing performances until his injury and it was a single-handedly won. Also, Tito was very close to Pep so he used the same "philosophy" and who knows? Maybe Tito could have become one of the greatest. We won the title with 11 points and got kicked out by Madrid because of a stupid referee decision, we dominated them otherwise. I don't know what you're talking about - we were a great team that needed some boosting. Nobody here is comparing the team to Jupp Heynckes's one, but to deny that we were a strong team ridiculous.
Barca B shouldn't be discounted in any way. if you read what he had to deal with and what he did with them, you'll be very surprised. Also, Bayern dominated Real in the first leg at Munich, but couldn't capitalize. Then in the second leg everything crashed down because of Tito's death, etc and Bayern got dominated in turn. Things like this happen in football - no matter how good a team is, some day it will get destroyed by another for various reasons. City beat us 6-1 under Fergie... Is Mancini a better manager than Fergie? Barca beat Real 5-1, is Guardiola a better manager than Mourinho?
And another thing - if that Barca side is so great, than why aren't they showing anything that they showed under Pep? They even have players like Neymar and Suarez - two of the best players in the world at the moment, and they are doing jack sh*t. You're discrediting everything Pep has done and glorifying everything that Mourinho has done.