If he does go into politics, that MDMA anecdote is a hell of a step up from Clinton and Obama's flirtations with weed!
Pssh. If he hasn't run through a wheat field, has he even lived?
If he does go into politics, that MDMA anecdote is a hell of a step up from Clinton and Obama's flirtations with weed!
If Louise Mensch's twitter feed is anything to go she's still doing coke
Clinton's claim not to inhale was almost less convincing than his claim that he's never sexually assaulted anyone.
he is genuinely unwell. congrats to all the people who defended him on here
Against my better judgement I watched the whole thing on youtube out of sheer boredom (think it's in the trending section). I've found some of the previous GQ interviews good I guess.
The main takeaway for me is that he's awfully boring to listen to in this format and in particular my ears perked up when I noticed how often he grossly overestimates his own wisdom and intelligence.
Noteworthy statement: I've read and studied over 200 books on climate change
Before declaring it's not serious and scaremongering. Like fcuk he's read that many books on a subject so far outside his own occupational interests.
I can't possibly roll my eyes more at the people who pay money to watch the likes of him, Harris, Rubin whoever on stage talking over this shite.
He's such a pillock. Honestly, the fawning of Maajid from the western media exposes everything about what the establishment expect from minority communities. Assimilation rather than integration.![]()
DIV/0 ratio for the free speech warrior
I'm still fascinated by Peterson's beef, salt, water, and nothing else diet.
Have you seen him on Twitter in the last few days? Lily Allen broke him.He's such a pillock. Honestly, the fawning of Maajid from the western media exposes everything about what the establishment expect from minority communities. Assimilation rather than integration.
Quite how this has been seen as a revelation after all the shit he's pulled over the years is also hilarious. He's been exactly like this for as long as I've known of him.
Have you seen him on Twitter in the last few days? Lily Allen broke him.
Christ. I imagine he thinks he’s coming across as measured and thoughtful, but he seems downright ominous to me in those clips.
It started when she posted an article criticising Quilliam's research into grooming gangs, and an academic/researcher on child exploitation agreed:Care to elaborate for those of us who don’t really dabble in the Twitterverse?
Oh yes, I couldn't not see it. He's been like this ever since he came into prominence though, so I'm surprised at the hand ringing over it.Have you seen him on Twitter in the last few days? Lily Allen broke him.
Is Rubin considered part of the IDW?
stop repeating yourself dudeHe seems like a massive pillock.
Is Rubin considered part of the IDW? He seems like a massive pillock.
Article about the likes of Harris, Shapiro, Peterson et al. Expecting Glenn Greenwald and his posse to be in full on drama queenish meltdown over this at some point.
Is Rubin considered part of the IDW? He seems like a massive pillock.
Sargon of Akkad is an absolute douche
Why do people take the likes of Peterson, Harris, Owen Jones, Solnit, Shapiro and Nawaz seriously? These people are just internet blowhards. They have very little of actual substance to say about anything. Serious intellectuals are people who bother to write seriously and engage with scholarship not the ones who spend hours on twitter picking fights with blue ticked handles. We went from Karl Popper, Arendt, AJP Taylor and Christopher Hill to this in two generations?
You've described Shapiro perfectly here and he's part of the "intellectual" dark web. So being a spineless slippery twat is definitely not grounds for exclusion from that group.but I don't think you could categorise Sargon as part of the so-called intellectual dark web. Sargon is spineless, dangerous and is ultimately a slippery twat;
You've described Shapiro perfectly here and he's part of the "intellectual" dark web. So being a spineless slippery twat is definitely not grounds for exclusion from that group.
Why do people take the likes of Peterson, Harris, Owen Jones, Solnit, Shapiro and Nawaz seriously? These people are just internet blowhards. They have very little of actual substance to say about anything. Serious intellectuals are people who bother to write seriously and engage with scholarship not the ones who spend hours on twitter picking fights with blue ticked handles. We went from Karl Popper, Arendt, AJP Taylor and Christopher Hill to this in two generations?
Yeah you really don't hear anyone criticising Islam these daysFair point, Shapiro does come across as full of shit each time I see him debating. To be honest with you I don't really know who could be categorised as part of the so-called IDW. I watch these guys sparingly and only follow the likes of Harris, Nawaz and Hirsi Ali for their critiques of Islam, which I find especially refreshing in this day and age.
Yeah you really don't hear anyone criticising Islam these days![]()
Haha yeah, I was kind of joking with thatI think they do it the right way, especially Harris (Nawaz and Hirsi Ali are well-intentioned but they can be condescending wankers at times). The likes of Sargon and Shapiro propagate plain anti-Muslim bigotry of very little substance with a clear intention to dehumanise Muslims.
The difference between the two approaches is significant.