Walters_19_MuFc
Full Member
They said the celebration was in reference to Silva who's out.
How so?
EDIT: Ahh..number 21.
They said the celebration was in reference to Silva who's out.
Prick.Graeme Poll on the Pogba incident:
"The biggest call was absolutely correct as Marriner dismissed Pogba for a nasty over-the-top tackle.
I’m staggered that any experienced football watcher could suggest that the challenge should not have warranted a red card.
Remember that ‘intent’ is no longer required unless for handball. Pogba gets none of the ball and lands his studs on Bellerin’s leg, clearly endangering his safety."
Graeme Poll on the Kane incident (ball barely in sight, straight leg, studs showing, textbook excessive force):
[paraphrasing] "No intent..."
Spurs are doing what we should have done to City. We ought to have kicked the lumps out of these lots for wasting 3 minutes of our time faffing around at the corner flag.
for David Silva who is missing.De Bruyne celebration for us?
Alli is a despicable cnut
What was the celebration about?
What was the celebration about?
I wonder who that 2-1 was directed at.
Was that De Bruyne doing a "2-1" celebration with his fingers in response to last Sunday's post-match celebrations controversy?A bit small-time if so but maybe it's about something else
Why is he doing a "2-1" with his fingers? Derby result dig?
City on a different level.
He'd have sent half our team off. It is only that Kane and Alli are English that has saved them.Not when we have Oliver as referees in match