He's so happy he got that quotation right.
Widdecombe is comfortably the most irritating person.
Her hymen is made of Sheffield steel.I'm not an Owen Smith fan but people booing him for saying that Brexit will damage the economy![]()
You forgot nuclear warheads, revamping Buckingham Palace and the Houses of Parliament and whatever this EU divorce fee ends up being. I look forward to you arguing just as hard that we need to find alternative methods of paying for those.
"For thousands of years, Britain has ruled and been a light to the world" — Average Brexiteer
Every little helps, right? I mean plenty will be calling for the relative pittance that is the foreign aid budget to be at least severely reduced if not scrapped so why not privatise the lot? Or, as 'the will of the people' is all the rage with these Brexiteers, you can turn democracy up to 11 and show the power of the free market by scrapping government funded programmes in their entirety. Make the monarchy a subscription service like Netflix with a company like Lootcrate sending a box of royal tat to subscribers' doors for an extra £10 a month, Trident can have its own Children in Need of Being Boiled Alive fundraiser while the Tory MPs and Lords can safely go on Bake Off now it's free from the shackles of the biased, fake news, snowflake ***** at the BBC.If we disbanded the Trident programme i would give a goodly portion of the proceeds to the MoD anyway, and the remainder to scientific research. The refurb of the parliament and Buckingham Palace wouldn't even amount to a quarter of the necessary funds for healthcare.
In Sweden there are fees for certain types of appointments and consultations; in other countries there is a nominal charge to see a GP; who else has our funding model?
This Week has had a good discussion on house building. Portillo called to bring in the public sector, I almost fainted!
I really picked up on that. He was absolutely spot on, and as he said, to appease the Tories, the homes would still be there to be sold later.
Every little helps, right? I mean plenty will be calling for the relative pittance that is the foreign aid budget to be at least severely reduced if not scrapped so why not privatise the lot? Or, as 'the will of the people' is all the rage with these Brexiteers, you can turn democracy up to 11 and show the power of the free market by scrapping government funded programmes in their entirety. Make the monarchy a subscription service like Netflix with a company like Lootcrate sending a box of royal tat to subscribers' doors for an extra £10 a month, Trident can have its own Children in Need of Being Boiled Alive fundraiser while the Tory MPs and Lords can safely go on Bake Off now it's free from the shackles of the biased, fake news, snowflake ***** at the BBC.
In the same week that the people who stood in front of £350m for the NHS posters and buses couldn't be bothered to even make the token gesture of voting for that amendment, I refuse to believe anybody trusts this bunch to 'reform' it into anything other than a way to make their mates a ton of money. People who think they actually give a toss about the NHS as a service are far beyond misinformed. But then again they're sick of experts, if not immigrants, in the first place so why would they need doctors?
In Sweden there are fees for certain types of appointments and consultations; in other countries there is a nominal charge to see a GP; who else has our funding model?
I'll make it easy for you. You could name the greatest concept for NHS funding ever imagined, with little increase in a tax entirely going to fund the service or actually chasing the full tax bill from the companies currently on the 'well it's better than nothing' tariff. I wouldn't trust any of the people in Westminster today, tomorrow or in the next decade to implement it, unless it massively benefited one or more of the private health companies they have money in, especially after the genius that was Lansley's 'no top down reorganisation of the NHS' reorganisation of the NHS. That has just worked wonders hasn't it?But do you disagree with the funding systems in other European countries, be it less centralised or not solely through NI?
You should really include a NSFW warning with things like this, there could be Tories reading this who will be nursing a semi right now. They're already having to avoid Twitter and Facebook just incase someone has posted this nugget.In France they have that too, but I think they're scrapping it soon. It still puts people off from seeing a GP if they have a low income, which just leads to more serious problems not being diagnosed early enough.
In France they have that too, but I think they're scrapping it soon. It still puts people off from seeing a GP if they have a low income, which just leads to more serious problems not being diagnosed early enough.
Is there no means testing component?
Been interesting to watch Chakrabarti since she became a peer, her adaptation to spin and obfuscation has been rapid.Three of tomorrow's panel have been announced:
John Swinney - SNP
Shami Chakrabarti - Labour
Val McDermid - Novelist and broadcaster.
If there's a member of the armed forces in the audience it is possible that Chakrabarti will be asked about disgraced lawyer, Paul Shiner. Perhaps whether he should be prosecuted.
Forgot this was on.
It's a foreign language transmission tonight
The film after is quite good, saw it on a Transatlantic flight a few years ago.
Aye, with Europa and Premier League Darts, I'm missing it too. The BBC needs to invest in a +1 channel.Forgot this was on.
I can usually find it on YouTube by now, but going by this thread I think it can wait until tomorrowAye, with Europa and Premier League Darts, I'm missing it too. The BBC needs to invest in a ** channel.
You watched in on a Plane, Colin.
Been interesting to watch Chakrabarti since she became a peer, her adaptation to spin and obfuscation has been rapid.