Brian fecking Cox, come on BBC this guy has no place on a serious programme.
Question Time & This Week
- Thread starter Liam147
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
Grayling not answering the question here...
Of course he isn't.
Who's that twat on the right?
A Russia Today presenter. So not surprised to see him on the defensive...
Ah
Always reminds me of Greg Davies, that Kier Starmer.
That moment where you support the annexation of part of a sovereign country.
Ah, wouldn't be Brexit without a "get on with it!" moment. This week with the added bonus of said person thinking the nerve agent attack is somehow a smokescreen.
I was actually impressed with the Irish lady, until she brought up the sexism card.
Stupid cow.
Stupid cow.
Brian Cox 
Just switched on but liking Brian Cox already.
Ok, so who else thought it was going to be the "science" Brian Cox...?
Dimbleby
Me for one. Would have done a better job, that's for sure.
This guy's a living Russian bot.
It's been a weirdly interesting episode insofar as we've seen a lot of lines blurred with the Salisbury incident and tension with Russia - you've got the Tories and Labour being condemnatory while both likely having in-house funding issues, and the Tories wanting to enact a Brexit which will inherently play into Russia's hands. And I also think it highlights why you can't really boil a lot of complex geopolitical issues at the moment into single statements as people are often wont to do.
Surprising number of Stoke fans in Dover.
He's such a provocateur.
Ian Rush pops up now
That's what I expected.
No way all these are under 30
Cleverly ignoring that Labour has a far higher female contingent in parliament, and has done for decades.
White men in not liking all women shortlists shocker
Why has Question Time because a show in which to constantly bash Corbyn? 2 minutes into the Windrush debate and Dimbleby is already bringing up Corbyn.
'a sympathetic hearing'
Yeah, OK then.
Yeah, OK then.
Thornberry did have a bit of a mare on the first question, especially when Corbyn himself was willing to vote against the legislation and has largely been correct on it, demonstrating the idea of going along with or abstaining on good faith wasn't really excusable back then.
I’m on it now. Mooch has finished his eerily calm schtick.
Imagine if Liz Truss was your boss
Bad day for Thornberry so far.
Thornberry has totally lost it
I get her fundamental point regarding needing definite proof and approval from the international community, but the problem (as was pointed out) is that Russia are going to do everything they can to obscure the truth presuming that truth implicates Assad in anything where he's going to be at risk of punishment. Which fundamentally changes the nature of the argument.
Cable making a point that people keep failing to grasp.
“Why would Assad use these weapons when he’s winning?”
The answer is “Assad will use these weapons because he winning”.
“Why would Assad use these weapons when he’s winning?”
The answer is “Assad will use these weapons because he winning”.
Conspiracy man ain't having that
Especially when he's shown time and time again he's able to get away with it without a particularly strong punishment. At most our airstrikes have inhibited his power to use them again but they haven't actually threatened his position, and when/if they're working that means at most this has served as a slight annoyance but a worthy sacrifice for his war.
TruthOpenAwakeEyesRealNewsDontTrustTheGovernment.David.Avocado.Woolf.Org.Gov.BBC.UK told him how the world really works on his Twitter Blog.
The most bloodthirsty audience in a while.
There was literally a report last year from the OPCW saying Assad was responsible for last year's chemical attack (and many others), so the whole "we need evidence to convict him" shtick is bs.