calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
That feeds directly into the cult’s attraction to him.Essentially, Rashford should play because he does charity.
That feeds directly into the cult’s attraction to him.Essentially, Rashford should play because he does charity.
I'm surprised this "leak" has gained so much traction in this thread. Never in a million years would Rashford join Liverpool nor would United even consider the option of selling him to them. There hasn't been any business between our two clubs in over half a century, that's not going to change any time soon.
I also think it's incredibly harsh to hold Rashford responsible for that ridiculous rumour. It's infinitely more likely that a bored journo set it for up clicks, he/she is probably laughing their ass off that it got so much attention.
It's a bonkers concept. If Holt had based his argument around Rashford coming good, it would have made more sense. Not once in the article does he even back his talent.That feeds directly into the cult around him.
How expensive would it really be?I have no shadow of a doubt he’ll get a new contract, just too expensive to replace him.
I think people have to brace themselves in for the inevitable.
To be fair, when I was in my early/mid teens I would have loved a customised chain. Thank God I didn't have money. I used to wear baggy jeans and oversized NFL tops even though I never watched a game of it.![]()
Well at least £80m plus wages I’m assume.How expensive would it really be?
For a current 5/2 winger? I’d gather it would be much less than that.Well at least £80m plus wages I’m assume.
What’s 5/2 mean? If you’re looking to get a top class winger, which is what the club projects Rashford as then that’s the money you’re looking at..For a current 5/2 winger? I’d gather it would be much less than that.
Five goal / two assist. It would be rather cheap to replace this productivity, it would certainly cost more to improve upon it, but I think we could get an improvement for less than 80 million.What’s 5/2 mean? If you’re looking to get a top class winger, which is what the club projects Rashford as then that’s the money you’re looking at..
Well before all this Rashford was around 20 goals a season and we were looking to improve on that, so to get a 20 a season winger and especially for Man United then it would be big money.Five goal / two assist. It would be rather cheap to replace this productivity, it would certainly cost more to improve upon it, but I think we could get an improvement for less than 80 million.
Sancho 3/3 72m and 350K a week.Five goal / two assist. It would be rather cheap to replace this productivity, it would certainly cost more to improve upon it, but I think we could get an improvement for less than 80 million.
Massively different current trajectories & foreseeable futures.Sancho 3/3 72m and 350K a week.
Find the chain tacky but he's not prick for wearing it. You're too harsh.
Maybe I’m being harsh and the guy needs to get away and clear his head to help himself
But if I was in his form, on his money, playing for Manchester United then I would be taking every day of this break to train my nuts off, improve my fitness, strength and sharpness.
I do find this intriguing. We can't press because we ain't fit enough, but they had a week off when ole was sacked, week off in January and a week off now. But yeah, depression n stuffSome people work on their game to become world greatest footballers and some just fly to Dubai when they had maybe worst season of their career. Priorities.
Can we just start by selling all players who wear iced-bling.
Fecking 'BW'. Christ.
The mistake we have made with Rashford, is the same mistake we have consistently made with the whole team. We are so needy for homegrown/ english talent. This is also apparent in our lack of modern managers over the last almost 10 years.
The assumption is that a homegrown or young English player would love the club, give their all and provide a level of certainty and stability to the club. In reality, this has led to us keeping and overpaying talent that were never truly good enough to either be here or demand the type of salary, celebration or respect they recieved. From 2010 with the likes of Welbeck, Cleverley to the Jones, Smalling debacle all the way down to the likes of Rashford, Lingard and Mctominay. We have neglected filling in certain positions with the hope of development. The problem in our player development isn't our coaching, it's our expectations that have been warped. It is very unlikely that a lot of great players develop and become superstars from one specific academy. Most great teams already have good players in their squad, which usually means that the younger player coming through has to prove their ability to displace the older good player. Foden at City had to prove that he was better or as good as the likes of Sterling and Mahrez to get the opportunities that he has had. When Busquets came through at City, he had to prove he was as good as Yaya Toure to start for Barca. At United, we have done the opposite of that. Our coaches and even fans, have encouraged not signing needed talent in order to give some young players the chance to develop. This has led to us being dependent on the future development, loyalty and performances of those players. Something that is usually far less likely to happen than people imagine. It feels similar to what Arsenal were doing in the late 2000's, relying heavily on the development of young players who either left or never reached the required level of a top talent. Arsenal, like us, wasted seasons waiting on these players to develop, which most never did. But it was " the right way".
Under Fergie, outside of Scholes, Beckham, Giggs and Neville we did not have any other first team players consistently starting at United coming through or developed through the academy. Further to this, outside of the outstanding talents of Ronaldo and Rooney, one could make the argument that we did not develop a true youngster coming in from outside the club who would start for the club. The young players we did sign, were young and already renowned like Sancho.
Oh sorry. I didn't realise only high profile athletes and Hollywood celebrities are allowed to attend events. My bad. Silly me.It affects their attitude and the will to work harder and improve their footballing skills? If you have a slightly sense of management in an organization you will know a company's culture affects productivity. Of course every club has high profile players (like we used to have ronaldo, beckham, rooney, rio who were very commercial and high profile) but they only did so after they were recognized as world class players. It is in contrast to like of Brandon Williams and Januzaj who think that they are Hollywood celebrities attending those boxing and NBA events even though they are still nobody in the football world.
PSG has all the stars in the world and it is their "made it" "celebrity" "arrogant" culture that make them a laughing stock in the champions league.
He hasn't shut down every claim about him in the media whether false or not.Well, he's certainly been quick in the past to shut down false claims, this one still stands. I doubt anyone is concerned about Rashford joining Liverpool
Like Ronaldo was in Dubai the last break we had? Same as Rashford, Lingard, Maguire, Dalot and a load of other footballers?Some people work on their game to become world greatest footballers and some just fly to Dubai when they had maybe worst season of their career. Priorities.
Rashy and BW, for feck sake. I wonder do they get a Happy Meal with those chains?
When you see that and stuff like the leaked dinner menus you realise a lot of these guys are just overgrown 12 year olds.
Rashy and BW, for feck sake. I wonder do they get a Happy Meal with those chains?
When you see that and stuff like the leaked dinner menus you realise a lot of these guys are just overgrown 12 year olds.
Heard some other say that. I don’t like when Ronaldo does that to. Football should always go first. Even more so when things are as they are.Like Ronaldo was in Dubai the last break we had? Same as Rashford, Lingard, Maguire, Dalot and a load of other footballers?
The mistake we have made with Rashford, is the same mistake we have consistently made with the whole team. We are so needy for homegrown/ english talent. This is also apparent in our lack of modern managers over the last almost 10 years.
The assumption is that a homegrown or young English player would love the club, give their all and provide a level of certainty and stability to the club. In reality, this has led to us keeping and overpaying talent that were never truly good enough to either be here or demand the type of salary, celebration or respect they recieved. From 2010 with the likes of Welbeck, Cleverley to the Jones, Smalling debacle all the way down to the likes of Rashford, Lingard and Mctominay. We have neglected filling in certain positions with the hope of development. The problem in our player development isn't our coaching, it's our expectations that have been warped. It is very unlikely that a lot of great players develop and become superstars from one specific academy. Most great teams already have good players in their squad, which usually means that the younger player coming through has to prove their ability to displace the older good player. Foden at City had to prove that he was better or as good as the likes of Sterling and Mahrez to get the opportunities that he has had. When Busquets came through at City, he had to prove he was as good as Yaya Toure to start for Barca. At United, we have done the opposite of that. Our coaches and even fans, have encouraged not signing needed talent in order to give some young players the chance to develop. This has led to us being dependent on the future development, loyalty and performances of those players. Something that is usually far less likely to happen than people imagine. It feels similar to what Arsenal were doing in the late 2000's, relying heavily on the development of young players who either left or never reached the required level of a top talent. Arsenal, like us, wasted seasons waiting on these players to develop, which most never did. But it was " the right way".
Under Fergie, outside of Scholes, Beckham, Giggs and Neville we did not have any other first team players consistently starting at United coming through or developed through the academy. Further to this, outside of the outstanding talents of Ronaldo and Rooney, one could make the argument that we did not develop a true youngster coming in from outside the club who would start for the club. The young players we did sign, were young and already renowned like Sancho.
What a lot of bollocksThe mistake we have made with Rashford, is the same mistake we have consistently made with the whole team. We are so needy for homegrown/ english talent. This is also apparent in our lack of modern managers over the last almost 10 years.
The assumption is that a homegrown or young English player would love the club, give their all and provide a level of certainty and stability to the club. In reality, this has led to us keeping and overpaying talent that were never truly good enough to either be here or demand the type of salary, celebration or respect they recieved. From 2010 with the likes of Welbeck, Cleverley to the Jones, Smalling debacle all the way down to the likes of Rashford, Lingard and Mctominay. We have neglected filling in certain positions with the hope of development. The problem in our player development isn't our coaching, it's our expectations that have been warped. It is very unlikely that a lot of great players develop and become superstars from one specific academy. Most great teams already have good players in their squad, which usually means that the younger player coming through has to prove their ability to displace the older good player. Foden at City had to prove that he was better or as good as the likes of Sterling and Mahrez to get the opportunities that he has had. When Busquets came through at City, he had to prove he was as good as Yaya Toure to start for Barca. At United, we have done the opposite of that. Our coaches and even fans, have encouraged not signing needed talent in order to give some young players the chance to develop. This has led to us being dependent on the future development, loyalty and performances of those players. Something that is usually far less likely to happen than people imagine. It feels similar to what Arsenal were doing in the late 2000's, relying heavily on the development of young players who either left or never reached the required level of a top talent. Arsenal, like us, wasted seasons waiting on these players to develop, which most never did. But it was " the right way".
Under Fergie, outside of Scholes, Beckham, Giggs and Neville we did not have any other first team players consistently starting at United coming through or developed through the academy. Further to this, outside of the outstanding talents of Ronaldo and Rooney, one could make the argument that we did not develop a true youngster coming in from outside the club who would start for the club. The young players we did sign, were young and already renowned like Sancho.
No, it's the insistence on giving spots in the first team to homegrown players regardless of whether their good enough or not. Then using that decision to limit signings in certain positions. Our policy isn't the problem, we've just been imitating it in the wrong way.So in your opinion United's problem has been trying to develop young homegrown players?
What's happening now is if we chose to keep giving Brown, O'shea and Fletcher chances in the first team with no competition and failing to sign Rio, Vidic, Carrick on the basis of them potentially improving.SAF did give plenty of opportunities to academy players not just class of 92 none became as successful but we shouldn’t forget those that were important squad or even first team players eg O’She, Brown, and Fletcher and plenty of other were given chances but we’re not good enough full stop and quickly lost their places and got moved on.
The great thing about SAF is that even with established world class players he knew when they had started to decline, so we can assume that he’d be an even better judge at sussing out what young players needed time and what players would just never make it.
The difference with Rashford is that he has demonstrated things since breaking into the first team that shows he has great potential and ability. So it’s a tough call to make. Where does patience end? Could take the Jose attitude and lose out players like Salah and De Bruyne when they’re in their early 20s. But then again could be to hopeful and get stuck with duds
I'm not saying it's wrong that we should not give youth a chance, but I'm saying that we've started doing it with no context. You will usually have 2 or 3 break through in a 6 year period from a good youth academy. Our fans had us forcing the likes of Pereira in the first team on the basis of having a little bit of technique and being from the academy. That type of thinking leaves you going nowhere. Giving chances to potential stars like Greenwood is one thing, but forcing through players like Mctominay and Pereira is another.What a lot of bollocks
83 years of youth team players in our squads and now its an issue
Yep Di Maria, Falcao, Pogba, Lukaku, Bailly and the other 30 failed players weve signed since Fergie left arent part of the problem
Messages that long that are pointless are just a waste of data... 8 bits for every one of those characters
What's happening now is if we chose to keep giving Brown, O'shea and Fletcher chances in the first team with no competition and failing to sign Rio, Vidic, Carrick on the basis of them potentially improving.