It kind of was. Not necessarilly from Redknapp but there was plenty of chatter regarding what it meant for Sterling. He had (still has I think?) stalled on opening contract negotiations, and a potential Sanchez move to City was part of the conversation regarding whether he might/should renew or not.
Rashford probably needs to leave - Jamie Redknapp
- Thread starter Sigma
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
It kind of was. Not necessarilly from Redknapp but there was plenty of chatter regarding what it meant for Sterling. He had (still has I think?) stalled on opening contract negotiations, and a potential Sanchez move to City was part of the conversation regarding whether he might/should renew or not.
hehe literally a wum! poor effort Jamie
Crap pundit. He can't even pretend to hide his hatred for United. No wonder his missus left him.
Rashford is Jose's prized possession; he works hard, has pace to run the channels, he has a good mentality, good goal output.
Rashford was trusted against Man City (and scored), he was played ahead of Zlatan last season against Chelsea.
Rashford was trusted against Man City (and scored), he was played ahead of Zlatan last season against Chelsea.
I can only imagine he is thinking to himself that maybe he can get Rashford to think maybe there is a better place for him. AND, that maybe that place is Liverpool. Otherwise, this was just jibber jabber to fill time (obviously, most likely scenario).
What ever happened to learning your craft and earning your spot? The kid is good, has the potential to be great and, imho, is exactly where he should be.
What ever happened to learning your craft and earning your spot? The kid is good, has the potential to be great and, imho, is exactly where he should be.
Rashford had been on the bench for weeks prior to the acquisition of Alexis and deservedly so.
Hasn't had a great season and needs to have some of the goal scoring burden taken off his shoulders. He will benefit from playing with the quality of Alexis and is less likely to suffer burnout, which is what he has been heading towards.
Hasn't had a great season and needs to have some of the goal scoring burden taken off his shoulders. He will benefit from playing with the quality of Alexis and is less likely to suffer burnout, which is what he has been heading towards.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/jamie-redknapp-fears-marcus-rashford-11933967
Seriously, he gets paid to talk shit like this
He needs to understand top clubs have tons of depth. With that the players within these clubs also have immense ambition and enjoy the competition for places. I highly doubt Rashford given his age is very worried he will never play again. He will fight for his place in the starting lineup and if he is in better form he will get his chance and if he takes it then there are no problems. Thats how he broke into the squad and now that he is going through some poor form he doesn't start. Its very simple but Jamie is just a little too simple to grasp such a concept.
I said this before the start of the season.
Martial and Lukaku are far better than Rashford, without being much older.
Martial and Lukaku are far better than Rashford, without being much older.
Ordinarily, I wouldn't agree. But coming from a man with Manchester United's interest seared into his heart I think we should all give this idea some serious consideration.
Inappropriate Content
He's not a wum, he's genuinely retarded.
Lukaku is 4.5 yrs older. At the same age he was at West Brom.
this doesn't even make sense, not many top clubs in england are giving chances to the likes of marcus rashford. at 20 he's already a very important player for manchester united and very much involved and understood to be the future, he plays quite regularly and he's trusted by the manager. why should/would he want to leave?
i'm so confused
i'm so confused
The 1st player that Sanchez would have threatened is Ibra, because we have another backup striker. The 2nd player that could be threatened is Mata, considering the form of Lingard and Martial, and Sanchez can easily replace Mata on experience, assists, and goals, and with more pace i.e. play him on the right. The one that would threaten Rashford is himself, if he doesn't learn and progress.
Besides, why do players move on loan - in order to have more game time. If Rashford is already starting 20 games a season plus loads of sub appearance, why does he need to move? If you can't learn at 20 games then you are not learning at 40 games neither.
Besides, why do players move on loan - in order to have more game time. If Rashford is already starting 20 games a season plus loads of sub appearance, why does he need to move? If you can't learn at 20 games then you are not learning at 40 games neither.
i agree, rashford needs to leave if his footballing brain didn't improve and keep making wrong decision on pitch
Wouldn't mind him going to Spain on a loan. He'd tear those defenders apart with his pace and get much needed game time up top.
These pundits *Sigh*...... If we play Rashford every game and he has a dip in form we're burning out a youngster and he's not properly managed, if we play them regularly but not every game they need to leave. The papers love a sob story.
I think Mou is managing Rashford perfectly, he's played plenty of football without burning out and is also kept hungry by the competition. Has there been any stories or quotes from Rashford himself saying he's not happy with playing time?
I think Mou is managing Rashford perfectly, he's played plenty of football without burning out and is also kept hungry by the competition. Has there been any stories or quotes from Rashford himself saying he's not happy with playing time?
Jose hates him.
Pundits like Redknapp are the scourge of modern football. If they were so smart, go take up coaching and show these managers you're criticising every week how it's done.
Redknapp probably needs to leave his jobhttps://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/jamie-redknapp-fears-marcus-rashford-11933967
Seriously, he gets paid to talk shit like this
Son of 'arry, ex Liverpool, writes for the Mail....
Sky for me now is at a crossroads. They have some genuinely decent pundits who offer good analysis (Neville/Carragher)and a few who are basically walking click bait
I get that not everyone wants a 45-minute insight into the runs made by the wingbacks but eventually fans of all clubs will be put off by the absolute drivel that comes out of the likes of Thompson, Charlie Nicholas and Redknapp.
They need to decide are we a proper footballing broadcaster or are we TVs answer to GiveMeSport
I get that not everyone wants a 45-minute insight into the runs made by the wingbacks but eventually fans of all clubs will be put off by the absolute drivel that comes out of the likes of Thompson, Charlie Nicholas and Redknapp.
They need to decide are we a proper footballing broadcaster or are we TVs answer to GiveMeSport
Swap with wele
Redknapp is a pratt.Wishful thinking on his part.
Jamie Redknapp, professional balloon.
Redknapp hasnt really said much wrong there. Rashford will get fewer chances because of sanchez signing and lingards amazing run of form.
Rashfords not been at it for a while. To get the best out of him and give him confidence he needs a regular run of games which isnt going to happen for him at the moment. Problem is hes too good to loan out because we will need him.
Disagree completely about thats him relating rashfords case to british players not getting as many opportunities. Its because hes british hes played in every game if anything. Martial didnt even come off the bench in some games this season
Rashfords not been at it for a while. To get the best out of him and give him confidence he needs a regular run of games which isnt going to happen for him at the moment. Problem is hes too good to loan out because we will need him.
Disagree completely about thats him relating rashfords case to british players not getting as many opportunities. Its because hes british hes played in every game if anything. Martial didnt even come off the bench in some games this season
Please you guys, I don't like you all calling our future manager an idiot or a WUM. Respect the man and his opinions
Bitter ABU media, again.
Ex-Liverpool pundit, again.
Getting very boring now. Change the record.
Ex-Liverpool pundit, again.
Getting very boring now. Change the record.
I’m not overly worried about Rashford paying any attention to anything Jamie Redknapp says.
Exactly this. It is getting boring. It's like they can't be bothered to put effort into their lazy and ill-thought criticisms anymore.
So your just a shit Jamie Redknapp
Redknapp is a clown, his own career was pretty pap, and will only be remembered for that stupid white suit, or being bum-chums with Corden!
Rashford should relish the fact Alexis is at Utd, a chance to learn from him. Competition for places is what makes the squad improve, im sure Marcus will roll up his sleeves and push on to get in the team, if he doesnt, then he is Utd material.
Rashford should relish the fact Alexis is at Utd, a chance to learn from him. Competition for places is what makes the squad improve, im sure Marcus will roll up his sleeves and push on to get in the team, if he doesnt, then he is Utd material.
Absolute nonsense. No path is closed and Sanchez can play in any of the 4 attacking positions. If Rashford can maintain form it could equally be Lingard or martial losing out. Ultimately though we are fighting on 3 fronts and will need all these players to contribute and the subs to step up and take their chances too.
My first instinct, beaten to it by Sigma. Would someone kindly point this out to Jamie, please?
ex-Liverpool man wants United to lose it's most promising young player. Sounds legit.
Does the same article get written if City sign Sanchez, and he "blocks the pathway" of one of Jesus, Sane or Sterling?
Of course it doesn't.
Does the same article get written if City sign Sanchez, and he "blocks the pathway" of one of Jesus, Sane or Sterling?
Of course it doesn't.
Of course that i don't agree with jaime and no way i want rash to go but from rashfords pespective; what is his future in united? To be 12th player.
Yes season is long, you can't play every match with best 11, etc... but the truth is that every coach has his first 11 which will start most of games. Especially big games. So his positions are lw and striker. He can play rw but even mourinho avoids to play him there. Lukaku is by far first option on striker, he is 24-25 years old and will play there for years.
So his future is to fight with martial for that lw spot. And now you have sanchez there also. When you look at it like this then it is not promising for him.
Yes season is long, you can't play every match with best 11, etc... but the truth is that every coach has his first 11 which will start most of games. Especially big games. So his positions are lw and striker. He can play rw but even mourinho avoids to play him there. Lukaku is by far first option on striker, he is 24-25 years old and will play there for years.
So his future is to fight with martial for that lw spot. And now you have sanchez there also. When you look at it like this then it is not promising for him.
Think a loan for Rashford would be a good move, Newcastle would be a decent fit at the moment would get lots of game time as a striker, see his long term future here cant see why at 19/20 he would want to leave a man utd if honest.
I wish I was a football pundit/journalist. Talk shit, get paid.