BorisontheRock
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2013
- Messages
- 587
So you could say we've conditioned them like [lab] rats... ExcellentI'd like to think our quoting of their threads has, in some small way, added to the paranoia we see from them today.
So you could say we've conditioned them like [lab] rats... ExcellentI'd like to think our quoting of their threads has, in some small way, added to the paranoia we see from them today.
For a start, they have nowhere to discuss it!!It's impossible for Sterling to have a bad game over at RAWK. When he does it's either Brentan or Roy's fault for making him tired. He's been tired for a whole month now it seems.
He played every world cup game, pre season games, 6 premier league games, 120 minutes of a carling cup game, and 2 internationals, and then 3 sub appearances.
The furore over Sterling just drives me further from having any positive thoughts regarding England.
Good job he was sent of in the pre World Cup warm up, he'd be even more knackered now!On Sterling
And Hodgson picked him for every one of those games. Every world cup game? 3 wasn't it?
One of which was basically a training match.On Sterling
And Hodgson picked him for every one of those games. Every world cup game? 3 wasn't it?
On Sterling
And Hodgson picked him for every one of those games. Every world cup game? 3 wasn't it?
We wished to shame them into silence, and in a weird way it's happened!So you could say we've conditioned them like [lab] rats... Excellent
We are a top top club and to stay there we can't be overdramatically sentimental.
An important warning
An important warning
We are a top top club and to stay there we can't be overdramatically sentimental.
Also know as racist.Hate the weird and inexplicable attitude some(most of what I know) liverpool supporters have towards the Suarez-Evra incident.
Hate the weird and inexplicable attitude some(most of what I know) liverpool supporters have towards the Suarez-Evra incident.
I think we all know an otherwise sane minded Liverpool fan, who will still defend Suarez to the hilt in the Evra saga. One of my best mates, who is otherwise a very bright lad, still blames Evra for the whole thing. Unbelievable. Some things are bigger than football allegiances and one of those is definitely racism.
I think we all know an otherwise sane minded Liverpool fan, who will still defend Suarez to the hilt in the Evra saga. One of my best mates, who is otherwise a very bright lad, still blames Evra for the whole thing. Unbelievable. Some things are bigger than football allegiances and one of those is definitely racism.
I didn't really mean fans in general. Liverpool fans are certainly in a league of their own when it comes to blind loyalty to their own.you can't put it down to football tribalism as United fans have hardly backed our players to the hilt when they've been idiotic
its a strange love they have - completely subjective and blind to decency
They're simply unprofessional, butthurt old men.That's the problem with scouse fans, their loyalty to LFC comes before anything else. Just see how pathetic the scouse pundits are, completely unable to hide their bias when covering a game.
Exactly.The only reasonable response from Suarez and Liverpool to that was a grovelling apology. It's still mind-boggling to me that they stood behind Suarez. Defending racist actions is racism in my book.
![]()
"No Dougal!....It wasn't funny when O Shea scored against Liverpool!....It was funny when he scored against Germany"
Hate the weird and inexplicable attitude some(most of what I know) liverpool supporters have towards the Suarez-Evra incident.
More mind blowing than the original racism, that's for sure.The only reasonable response from Suarez and Liverpool to that was a grovelling apology. It's still mind-boggling to me that they stood behind Suarez. Defending racist actions is racism in my book.
It's because they're physically incapable of conceding that their side of it might not have been in the right of some dispute, and are instinctively compelled to blindly support their own, but they also know that there really can be no defending someone who still addresses people by the colour of their skin after living in northern Europe for five years.
This makes it impossible for them to be anything other than completely senseless about it, so most of them cherrypick the stance that lets then back their man while being a most incomprehensible concoction of arguments that somehow, to them, doesn't amount to justifying a twat who addresses black men by the colour of their skin in 2013 England, but still supporting said twat through the ordeal.
Needless to say, their argument ends up being barely coherent. Actual overt racism tends to be more plain and easily identifiable. Theirs isn't simple racism, it's a mentality where loyalty to one's club is more important than decency, and if it's a choice between being loyal to the club or being against racism, they choose the former, which can amount to racist behaviour in a sort of roundabout way.
Exactly.
And not even a bleeding sad old after-the-fact apology forthcoming from that lot. Disgusting.
I think what he means is that Aspas wasn't seen as a starting striker whereas Carroll was. Thus two different levels of transfers. They wasted money on both obviously.![]()
Re: This nonsense about Liverpool not being able to challenge again next season
« Reply #1001 on: October 6, 2014, 11:56:10 PM »
Quote from: Cid on October 6, 2014, 10:10:23 PM
If I have only one wish that I could put upon our transfer dealings going forward it would be that we never again sign some no-name player off the back of one season's good form. It has fecked us time and time again and we don't seem to learn from it.
This is so true. We do it at every level of transfer too, from the Aspas' to the Carroll's
Liverpool fans rewriting history, again... Every level of transfer... From Aspas to Carroll... They do realise they wasted £9m on Aspas right
Gets more and more like the Good Soldier Svejk with every new press conference.
The novel is set during World War I in Austria-Hungary, a multi-ethnic empire full of long-standing tensions. Fifteen million people died in the War, one million of them Austro-Hungarian soldiers of whom around 140,000 were Czechs. Jaroslav Hašek participated in this conflict and examined it in The Good Soldier Švejk.
Many of the situations and characters seem to have been inspired, at least in part, by Hašek's service in the 91st Infantry Regiment of the Austro-Hungarian Army. The novel also deals with broader anti-war themes: essentially a series of absurdly comic episodes, it explores both the pointlessness and futility of conflict in general and of military discipline, Austrian military discipline, in particular. Many of its characters, especially the Czechs, are participating in a conflict they do not understand on behalf of a country to which they have no loyalty.
The character of Josef Švejk is a development of this theme. Through (possibly feigned) idiocy or incompetence he repeatedly manages to frustrate military authority and expose its stupidity in a form of passive resistance: the reader is left unclear, however, as to whether Švejk is genuinely incompetent, or acting quite deliberately with dumb insolence. These absurd events reach a climax when Švejk, wearing a Russian uniform, is mistakenly taken prisoner by his own troops.