...
RAWK Goes into Meltdown 2014/2015 - The "We go again" Edition
- Thread starter Pexbo
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
...
If there were claims, I think they've mostly been removed in a 'clean-up', mate.
I thought last season's summer of fun was them bulking out their squad in preparation for their rigorous CL campaign? Rather than buying squad players they need to improve on the mediocrity that's in their starting 11, and demote said mediocrity to the bench. Ings isn't going to lead the attack, he's simply not good enough. I also think their expectations of Milner are warped. Yes, he did a very good job for City, just as Park did a very good job for us, but at Liverpool, Milner isn't going to have the luxury of being surrounded by the likes of Aguero, Silva, Nasri, Toure, Ronaldo, Rooney, Scholes and Giggs.
they thought their Gnasher-less 1st XI was still brilliant though didn't they?
and they somehow managed to buy people who weren't so much added & more mediocre-ness as worse that what they already had. and they didn't replace Gnash either - a bunch of us would have struggled to do a more piss-poor recruitment job for them
Markovic has shown some potential though, innit,
on Markovic another part of the interweb reports that historically they were saying
they thought their Gnasher-less 1st XI was still brilliant though didn't they?
and they somehow managed to buy people who weren't so much added & more mediocre-ness as worse that what they already had. and they didn't replace Gnash either - a bunch of us would have struggled to do a more piss-poor recruitment job for them
Markovic has shown some potential though, innit,
on Markovic another part of the interweb reports that historically they were saying
- we could be getting someone who is unplayable.
- I am more excited about this than a possible Alexis inclusion in our team.
- A young Kaka in his early Milan days
- I don't know much about this lad, never seen him play but from the descriptions i've read it's got me thinking of a Pavel Nedved
- When Chelsea were linked with the guy he had the most potential for a 19 year old of anyone bar Messi and Ronaldo
- This lad looks the definition of a Brendan Rodgers player. Oozes quality, pace, skill and vision.
Who are those quotes about? In hindsight, I suppose he was right.
city's 40m bid rejected for sterling. I really hope they walk away and leave him stuck there, would be hilarious
quotes are about Markovic !! like what I said !!! (but should have made clearer stead of woffling)
rejected £ 40 M, blimey what do they think they can get for him?
football's gone mad etc...
football's gone mad etc...
Doesn't a huge chunk of that go to QPR anyway?
20% goes to QPR.
Fecking nice! So from £40M QPR would get 8M.
No wonder Liverpool are holding out for as much as possible.
yeah they think he's the best young player in Europe, and worth £50m. but will only pay him 100k a week for the honour playing for Liverpool football club.
Ah, 'Gnasher'
So who has the honour of creating the RAWK goes into Meltdown 2015/16 thread?
The subtitle is the most important thing, makes or breaks it. "We Go Again" will take some beating.
After the success of this one, it has to be @Pexbo surely?
RAWK Goes into Meltdown 2015/2016 - The "We're F#cked" Edition
Probably has to include the word 'Stamp'.
"The post Stampy edition"
I think we have a winner!
Since it's 70 years since the end of World War II could we call it "We Goebbels Again"?
Actually, this one!
Actually, this one!
In 2013/14 first five fixtures we had Swansea Chelsea Arsenal Palace and City they really are a bunch of idiots if they think there is a conspiracy against them.
Stamping our place in history?
I asked earlier in the thread what the subtitle should be, here are some responses:
Might depend on who their manager is.... RAWK meltdown 2016: Can Kopp cope with the Kop?
'Ganghi and the Spacegoats Edition'
And pre madonnas.
You'll Never Win Again edition?
Melt Down & Clean Up Edition
38 Seconds From Disaster
38 Seconds From Disaster
I like the idea of commemorating their 26th year without a title (probably). It's always been a benchmark in my mind since we started catching up with and eventually overtaking them.
This cannot be true, surely?!?!
"Post Slippy down the table Edition"
"Kopping without Slippy edition"
"Kopping without Slippy edition"
Given that it's going to be 26 years without a title, and we're trying to think of a title, can't we incorporate that into it? Like "this thread actually has a title", or "26 years without a subtitle" or something.