Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion
- Thread starter Wednesday at Stoke
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
I'm not sure that's the right reading of the room
They have abstained but as they knew Russia would veto that seems fairly logical
They are offering financing still just not in dollars which ties in with the longer term aim of having the yuan as a secondary reserve / international currency base
We've managed to not support or condemn Russia in Ukraine, US in Iraq, and the USSR in Afghanistan
But *true colours* - every country has the same "true colours" - self-interest and cowardice. Which country had the guts to do sanctions on the US in 2003? The concept itself is so absurd.
Feels dirty but Marco has been rather good the last few days
How so, though?
Indeed. Credit where it's due.
Written by Lawrence Freedman, professor of war studies in London.
https://samf.substack.com/p/a-reckl...campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=url
He is hoping to widen the cracks in NATO so whenever he wants something he can get it by moving troops to the border and asking how certain are you NATO is there for you and wouldn't you rather just give me your lunch money.
These countries couldn't give a flying feck about India, south Asian, or any non European country at that. The British empires negative effects upon the South Asian continent are still seen to this day. They're faced with ferocious racism and mocked so often. Yet it's india who is showing its true coloursWe've managed to not support or condemn Russia in Ukraine, US in Iraq, and the USSR in Afghanistan
But *true colours* - every country has the same "true colours" - self-interest and cowardice. Which country had the guts to do sanctions on the US in 2003? The concept itself is so absurd.
I should have said governments and not countries. I didn’t mean to cause offence.
Ukraine joining NATO would have just as much impact on Russia as Baltic countries joining in early 2000s I.e. none whatsoever. It was never about Ukraine joining NATO.
That might well be his plan, but I just don't see that it's ever going to work. The entire reason Ukraine is being invaded is because they're not yet in NATO. I guess they could try it on Finland, but odds are they will join NATO long before that. I also don't think Russia has any desire to invade Finland. Finland is also in the EU, so that's another potential issue.
I think that’s why I had to comment. The original post was greeted with a load of whataboutism and rhetoric, whereas really….it’s all any of these countries ever do (further their own agendas)We've managed to not support or condemn Russia in Ukraine, US in Iraq, and the USSR in Afghanistan
But *true colours* - every country has the same "true colours" - self-interest and cowardice. Which country had the guts to do sanctions on the US in 2003? The concept itself is so absurd.
… by attacking a non-NATO country?
Which NATO has said numerous times they won’t defend with military personnel?
Which said themselves they expect no backing from NATO?
And has forced NATO and the US to say in the clearest way possible that they will defend any NATO country with full and devastating force (which was to be expected)?
Its amusing in a way to see so many Republicans - bar the few Trumpers and well Trump who again banged on about the election being stolen keeping very quiet, nothing from ol Turtleneck or Captain Mexico Cruz.
In the end, ukranian soldiers, civilians and russian soldiers will die for absolutely nothing, feck putin, feck nato
How heroic behavior affects morale & psychology is an interesting subject. I wonder what the research says. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Snake Island 13 unleashed a visceral anger within Ukrainian military.
The Tunisian protests were sparked by the guy who burned himself.
The Tunisian protests were sparked by the guy who burned himself.
These countries couldn't give a flying feck about India, south Asian, or any non European country at that. The British empires negative effects upon the South Asian continent are still seen to this day. They're faced with ferocious racism and mocked so often. Yet it's india who is showing its true colours
Give it a rest or start a new thread, this is about Ukraine and Putin, embarrassing yourself.
This is my point as well. It’s a false narrative.
Why feck NATO?
On a positive note we’ve managed to collect 50 tones of goods in aid to Lviv people in Kraków today. Will continue tomorrow with more coming. Planning to pack as much stuff as my car can fit.
That's awesome.
If that was the case there wouldn't currently be a war going on.
Putin isn't going to commit half his armed forces to a war that will obviously provoke a worldwide backlash if he doesn't feel threatened.
There's not much hope of occupying or claiming Ukraine either long term but he can occupy some if it or use it as a bargaining chip. I think something has obviously happened recently which has made him feel he needed to act drastically.
The alternative explanation is that he's suddenly gone completely mad but that doesn't really make sense considering the efforts from his side to try and avoid imagery of Russian aggression.
Ace !
50 tons? Wow. That’s great! Kudos.
Wow that's really good stuff, keep up the good work!
Aside from the "having finally tipped over the edge of lunacy" argument - Russia has been chipping away at the foundations of Western democracies and their institutions for years now, and I imagine that with the shifts in various governments and the EU in recent years, Putin thought this was the optimal moment to show his hand and expose what he hoped/hopes is a lack of unity and strength amongst his oldest and most bitter foes - Western Democracies. With the economic challenges each are facing, and the individualistic nature of each's critical infrastructure reliance, he probably thought a better opportunity to upset the traditional apple cart was unlikely to come around again soon.
Did he think that this movement alone would win over the whole of Ukraine? Probably not, but I think he hoped - and probably still does - that a weak and unsubstantial response from NATO and the West would cause division and disillusionment amongst the Ukraine populous. He doesn't need the population's support, but more so their ambivalence towards any regime he instates.
The latter is where he's got it totally wrong - the response from Ukraine and their leaders has been unbelievable and inspiring. What's more, it seems the international responses are ramping up too, with nations finding common ground/agreed courses of actions relatively swiftly.
Long story short - I doubt the move is really going to plan for him, but that probably puts Putin in a more dangerous and unpredictable place. Goodness knows what he'll do next.
How is he going to feel less threatened now, than if Ukraine joined NATO? This is going to have serious consequences for the Russian economy, and it's not like it's done anything to lower tension with NATO, or other non-NATO countries. It's quite likely that this is going to lead directly to Finland and Sweden joining NATO. And it's not like Ukrainians will have warmed up to Russia either.
A decade ago half the population supported a pro-Russian candidate, but I'm sure only a very small minority of even those would ever support what's going on now. Best case scenario for Putin is that they now go on to conquer Ukraine fairly quickly, toppling the government and installing their own puppet government. But those will have next to zero legitimacy with the people, so Putin will have to have his army occupying the country, which is obviously going to get ugly. And if Ukraine ever gets out from under the thumb of the Russians again they're sure to seek some kind of alliance, or even NATO membership.
The world doesn’t revolve around Europe.
NATO should have been dissolved when the soviet union collapsed
I think option two there is the most likely reason. Win some extra territory (including Crimea). Save face.The eastern parts are happy to become Russian (or a separate east Ukraine), and he’ll officially keep his valuable Black Sea port in Sevastopol under Russian control.
I don’t think he’ll restart the war if the hypothetical west Ukraine then proceeds to join NATO in a decade or three, as Putin got what he wanted. More (strategically important) land, and a big war (hailed as a win) to be remembered by in Mother Russia.
EDIT: I didn’t include the options
Option 1: He actually felt threatened by Ukraine
Option 2: Blatant land grab when the timing felt right
Option 3: Lunacy
Pretty sure every country with a border close to Russia would disagree with you. And then some.
Agreed, if this was the case then the likes of Estonia and Latvia would be under Putin rule.
Not if we had a real EU defense army capable of protecting Europe (Including Greece against Erdogan) independently of how Pennsylvania voted in the last American election.
Are they paying Tucker via swift?