VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 33,990
Btw reuters are the lowest of the low, I advise you to avoid you them as a news source due to strong links with Kremlin.
Reuters "lowest of the low"?

Come on dude.
Btw reuters are the lowest of the low, I advise you to avoid you them as a news source due to strong links with Kremlin.
ReuTers innitReuters "lowest of the low"?
Come on dude.
They had to already backtrack and apologize (with public statements) for a lot of misreporting on Ukraine. This happens so regularly this is definitely anything but a coincidence.Reuters "lowest of the low"?
Come on dude.
They admittedly rank quite low with stuff regarding war in Ukraine.Reuters "lowest of the low"?
Come on dude.
Examples?They had to already backtrack and apologize (with public statements) for a lot of misreporting on Ukraine. This happens so regularly this is definitely anything but a coincidence.
Just a handful I was able to find off the back of quick search but the pattern is evident and the angle they’re purposefully pushing.Examples?
It'll be a nato/Russia conflict if the Norway pipe is touched.To anyone more knowledgeable than me please.
if the damage to the gas line is deliberate, what does that mean in terms of a possible reaction?
my view is that it’s going to mean explicit conflict between nato and Russia.
please convince me otherwise
To anyone more knowledgeable than me please.
if the damage to the gas line is deliberate, what does that mean in terms of a possible reaction?
my view is that it’s going to mean explicit conflict between nato and Russia.
please convince me otherwise
This one? Nothing at all. It wasn’t functioning anyway (cause Russia weaponized their gas export), and Europe was/is preparing without the Russian gas.To anyone more knowledgeable than me please.
if the damage to the gas line is deliberate, what does that mean in terms of a possible reaction?
my view is that it’s going to mean explicit conflict between nato and Russia.
please convince me otherwise
If it is deliberate then surely the only possible option is Russia? I’m not buying that a nato country would have done it in order to escalate.It can't be proved that's russia. Also damaging pipelines might not be enough to trigger article 5, or be considered an attack. If an attack is in NATO waters, then yeah, it's an attack, but if it's in international waters, I'm not sure.
To anyone more knowledgeable than me please.
if the damage to the gas line is deliberate, what does that mean in terms of a possible reaction?
my view is that it’s going to mean explicit conflict between nato and Russia.
please convince me otherwise
I'm glad I impress you but the only time I can remember mentioning Thucydides is when making a playful reach while reviewing Raya and The Last Dragon. It was sort of a joke but I'm glad it made an impression on you.
On your point about comparative suffering: I'm not sure how it relates to anything I've posted, sorry.
On your point about my involvement and knowledge on Russia: As a largely ignorant outsider and having ignored the thread for a while I came back in because I was genuinely interested in the first hand perspectives of the Russian posters on here after the partial-mobilisation news and how this turn of events might affect them and their families directly. Perhaps in the vain hope that it might quicken an end to the carnage in Ukraine. But to try and find these posts I had to wade through the spamming of idiotic war-bro fantasies and caricatures of all Russians, or most Russians, or all Russians except redcafe posters (grovel, grovel) as weak and nazis and *****.
Ok fine, if the thread is happy with the Glaston model of war reportage as twitter length missile strikes set to a soundtrack of death metal (literally this is the stuff he was spamming), and if war-lolz is where it's at then I'll put it back on ignore and leave you to have your fun in peace. Sorry to blow your buzz, see ya.
P.S. The How To Train Your Dragon series was superior to Disney's latest dragon adventures.
Thanks for the reply, from what I understand breaking this line might affect “legit” supplies from the nordics?Russia owns the Nord stream lines I think
Basically they broke their own stuff... (The implication being if we can do that we could take out other lines) but I don't think a NATO Russia conflict will happen over them breaking their own stuff
Russia declaring the Donbas part of Russia tomorrow and presumably then accusing Ukraine of attacking russian territory ... Now that might escalate quickly if they demand Ukrainian withdrawal and start threatening tactical nukes etc
I don't think soThanks for the reply, from what I understand breaking this line might affect “legit” supplies from the nordics?
No it doesn't, those are different pipelines. It's just about the message that those could be destroyed as well.Thanks for the reply, from what I understand breaking this line might affect “legit” supplies from the nordics?
Thank you for the reply.No it doesn't, those are different pipelines. It's just about the message that those could be destroyed as well.
Yeah if reaction is strong though something along the lines of Norway/USA coming out to say that article 5 will be activated right away should similar thing happen to their pipe.Thank you for the reply.
Makes me feel a bit better about the situation.
If putin is just dipping his toes in the water then hopefully the reaction will prevent him from actually doing it
Please read the last few pages.There’s a video clip of Biden saying that if Russia attacks Ukraine, then USA will take out Nord Stream.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMF8CLvaQ/
"Timothy Ash, a senior emerging markets sovereign strategist, said the allegations that Russia could be behind the damage were "remarkable."
"So a number of holes appeared in these pipelines, which are thick and buried deep. This has to be subs, likely Russian subs," he said in an emailed note, adding that it would be "incredible" if Russia was found to have been willing "to cause such risks to shipping in the Baltics.""
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/27/rus...ter-leaks-found-on-nord-stream-pipelines.html
"Leaks of this size are a severe safety and environmental hazard, especially should Russia not stop pumping gas into the system."
Is that the point, to cause an environmental hazard? If they don't stop pumping gas that will tell us all we need to know.
Russia should be designated a state sponsor of terrorism.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...restrained-during-fsb-interrogation-in-russia
There’s a video clip of Biden saying that if Russia attacks Ukraine, then USA will take out Nord Stream.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMF8CLvaQ/
To what benefit?There’s a video clip of Biden saying that if Russia attacks Ukraine, then USA will take out Nord Stream.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMF8CLvaQ/
He was talking about NS2 and he meant sanctions, which wasn't needed since Germany voluntarily stopped the pipeline when the war started.There’s a video clip of Biden saying that if Russia attacks Ukraine, then USA will take out Nord Stream.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMF8CLvaQ/
Well... sanctions against Germany were implemented and didn't stop the progress of the project, the beginning of the war did. As obviously sanctions weren't enough it is a valid question what means the US would have taken (or possibly did).He was talking about NS2 and he meant sanctions, which wasn't needed since Germany voluntarily stopped the pipeline when the war started.
The point is, it's not the US blowing the pipelines, that's ridiculous.Well... sanctions against Germany were implemented and didn't stop the progress of the project, the beginning of the war did. As obviously sanctions weren't enough it is a valid question what means the US would have taken (or possibly did).
The US trying to force Germany to buy their expensive fracking LNG isn't that well received here...
Please read the last few pages.
Well... sanctions against Germany were implemented and didn't stop the progress of the project, the beginning of the war did. As obviously sanctions weren't enough it is a valid question what means the US would have taken (or possibly did).
The US trying to force Germany to buy their expensive fracking LNG isn't that well received here...
This is a vexing question. There was a post in the WaPo comments that suggested the reason may be internal. Putin blows the pipelines and the oilygarchs' power is diminished; a message is sent to those around him that he can break them without resorting to defenestration.To what benefit?
People are wondering if Norway did it just because they’re about the only country that benefits from this. Which is quite a stretch.
Meloni replying to Zelensky.
The Russian trolls will happily say that there is no proof it was Russia. It could be Germany who did it. No? Can you prove that it wasn't Germany? Can you prove it wasn't Ukrainian nazis? Can you prove it wasn't the Klingons?