Classical Mechanic
Full Member
What did NATO, the US, EU et al do when he annexed The Crimea?
What did NATO, the US, EU et al do when he annexed The Crimea?
What did NATO, the US, EU et al do when he annexed The Crimea?
It all depends on who is running the show in Washington. Obama was weak and feckless in terms of smashing people in the face when it was necessary. Unfortunately, Trump isn't much better with his Putin love.
What exactly are people hoping for that would constitute a 'strong' response to Russia?
What exactly are people hoping for that would constitute a 'strong' response to Russia?
But we don’t know what the countermeasures will be yet. I am no fan of May but I don’t know what she has done wrong here. She had to make a public response to such a flagrant disregard of British sovereignty and she has observed the usual diplomatic protocol of setting an ultimatum in which the other side has to respond.
Look around this table and tell me who can stand up to Putin and his cronies.
Perhaps best to wait and see before complaining.Its a bluff and Russia called it almost immediately. They decided they would ignore it because they know its all bark and no bite. The government is so weak that they decided to give Russia an out by including "lost control of its nerve agent reserves" and Russia completely disregarded it.
Look around this table and tell me who can stand up to Putin and his cronies. Weak and inept government all round trying to look strong and failing yet again.
![]()
Unless she declares war the ultimatum is pointless because our response will be a fart in the wind in comparison.
Don't get me wrong I don't think we should declare war but the ultimatum and the very public manner of its delivery will make us a laughing stock when Russia receives a slap on the wrist, if that.
Killing some bloke is a bit different from annexing the Sudetenland.
Bite the bullet and boot them out of London.
Seize Russian assets. Stop the dirty money laundering.
There'll be an economic hit but so what.
Boot them all? You mean all Russian citizens?
What happened to Strong and Stable?
The Russians of course did this before with for example Litvinenko in 2006. But you have to wonder, is the Kremlin just taking the piss now and doing this specifically in England to create even more division? USA under Trump is not going to be a proper ally in these situations. And the EU, well I don't know honestly, it could be because there's a hell of a lot of anti Russian sentiments at the moment, but with Brexit looming in the background... Just another move from Vladimir's divide and conquer playbook?
Bite the bullet and boot them out of London.
Seize Russian assets. Stop the dirty money laundering.
There'll be an economic hit but so what.
I agree in principle and if the UK hadn't fecked itself in the arse by voting for Brexit then I would agree completely. However the last thing we need as a country now is anymore economic hits. Recent reports show since Brexit that demand for houses in London is at its lowest in over 30 years and that prices on average have dropped by over 15%
The last thing London needs at the moment is more turmoil. Saying that though a strong response is needed and I don't think sanctions are tough enough.
Well I'm no economist but I'd say that falling house prices in London should be a good thing?
Look at it this way. If the assets of oligarchs are seized by the state then Chelsea , and a percentage of Arsenal, would then in theory belong to all of us![]()
Look at it this way. If the assets of oligarchs are seized by the state then Chelsea , and a percentage of Arsenal, would then in theory belong to all of us![]()
Its a bluff and Russia called it almost immediately. They decided they would ignore it because they know its all bark and no bite. The government is so weak that they decided to give Russia an out by including "lost control of its nerve agent reserves" and Russia completely disregarded it.
Look around this table and tell me who can stand up to Putin and his cronies. Weak and inept government all round trying to look strong and failing yet again.
![]()
Unless she declares war the ultimatum is pointless because our response will be a fart in the wind in comparison.
Don't get me wrong I don't think we should declare war but the ultimatum and the very public manner of its delivery will make us a laughing stock when Russia receives a slap on the wrist, if that.
It doesn't have to be war, you impose the Magnitsky act, start seizing assets and all the cronies will fall in line.
It doesn't have to be war, you impose the Magnitsky act, start seizing assets and all the cronies will fall in line.
Because that worked well after Litvinenko or even more recently Ukraine. Its an act of aggression and it needs to be resolved in the diplomatic back channels.
The government wanted to look strong and they publicly announced ultimatum on Russia, and now they are considering what action to take. So the ultimatum was simply useless after all as predicted and they have just become a laughing stock.
They wanted to bluff knowing they have a weak hand and there is nothing they can do and the Russians called it. They have just undermined this country even more on the international stage.
Worst. Government. EVER!
Its a long game imposing sanctions but its the best route to make it hurt where the oligarchs keep their assets. Anyone needing a game plan on Russia needs only to look at Bill Browder's senate testimony for the Magnitsky act to see why something so simple works so effectively.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ony-to-the-senate-judiciary-committee/534864/
Very interesting read. Seems like Russian government is no different than it has been for the last 50+ years. (My lifetime doesn’t allow me to go back much further).Its a long game imposing sanctions but its the best route to make it hurt where the oligarchs keep their assets. Anyone needing a game plan on Russia needs only to look at Bill Browder's senate testimony for the Magnitsky act to see why something so simple works so effectively.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ony-to-the-senate-judiciary-committee/534864/
It's an odd one though. If anything its more likely to swell anti-Brexit feeling, because feeling threatened by a large hostile power is more likely to make you want to cling to allies, and America aren't worth shit to us at the moment. I really don't understand the purpose of this from Russia's perspective, it seems nonsensical.
It's an odd one though. If anything its more likely to swell anti-Brexit feeling, because feeling threatened by a large hostile power is more likely to make you want to cling to allies, and America aren't worth shit to us at the moment. I really don't understand the purpose of this from Russia's perspective, it seems nonsensical.
Kind of stupid move.Obviously not but a good start would be the oligarchs known to have close ties to Putin and who have invested their stolen money in London.
Corbyn seemingly getting slaughtered for suggesting that any response should be guided by evidence and follow international law.![]()
More likely because he’s known to be Russia fanboy.Corbyn seemingly getting slaughtered for suggesting that any response should be guided by evidence and follow international law.![]()