Yes I have.
Hes a bloke who has claimed, he laid bare novichok in his £6 book. Nothing there does anything to make that a less ridiculous claim.
Just for reference about nerve agents.
This is from the OPCW in 2013
Regarding new toxic chemicals not listed in the Annex on Chemicals but which may nevertheless pose a risk to the Convention, the SAB makes reference to “Novichoks”. The name “Novichok” is used in a publication of a former Soviet scientist who reported investigating a new class of nerve agents suitable for use as binary chemical weapons. The SAB states that it has insufficient information to comment on the existence or properties of “Novichoks”
https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/CSP/RC-3/en/rc3wp01_e_.pdf
And this is from Dr Robin Black in 2016, he was head of Porton Down at the time
In recent years, there has been much speculation that a fourth generation of nerve agents, ‘Novichoks’ (newcomer), was developed in Russia, beginning in the 1970s as part of the ‘Foliant’ programme, with the aim of finding agents that would compromise defensive countermeasures. Information on these compounds has been sparse in the public domain, mostly originating from a dissident Russian military chemist, Vil Mirzayanov. No independent confirmation of the structures or the properties of such compounds has been published. Robin Black (Dr), Development, Historical Use and Properties of Chemical Warfare Agents. Royal Society of Chemistry 2016.
Thats found here
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/chapter/bk9781849739696-00001/978-1-84973-969-6
I am not trying to claim any sort of conspiracy, or russia are innocent or any of that, but I do like evidence and truth. Despite mays outburts we are a long way from that.
She is still refusing to present evidence to the OPCW or even the European Security Council, and the longer that goes on, the more she plays into putins hands, giving him the chance to claim she has no evidence.